 |
PDBsum entry 2cyh
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Mechanistic implication of crystal structures of the cyclophilin-Dipeptide complexes.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
Y.Zhao,
H.Ke.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Biochemistry, 1996,
35,
7362-7368.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
|
Note In the PDB file this reference is
annotated as "TO BE PUBLISHED".
The citation details given above were identified by an automated
search of PubMed on title and author
names, giving a
perfect match.
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
The structures of cyclophilin A complexed with dipeptides of Ser-Pro, His-Pro,
and Gly-Pro have been determined and refined at high resolution. Comparison of
these structures revealed that the dipeptide complexes have the same molecular
conformation and the same binding of the dipeptides. The side chains of the
N-terminal amino acid of the above dipeptides do not strongly interact with
cyclophilin, implying their minor contribution to the cis-trans isomerization
and thus accounting for the broad catalytic specificity of the enzyme. The
binding of the dipeptides is similar to that of the common substrate
succinyl-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-p-nitroanilide in terms of the N-terminal hydrogen
bonding and the hydrophobic interaction of the proline side chain. However,
substantial difference between these structures are observed in (1) hydrogen
bonding between the carboxyl terminus of the peptides and Arg55 and between
Arg55 and Gln63, (2) the side chain conformation of Arg55, and (3) water binding
at the active site. These differences imply either that dipeptides are not
substrates but competitive inhibitors of peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerases or
that dipeptides are subject to different catalytic mechanisms from tetrapeptides.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |