spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 2b7x

Go to PDB code: 
Top Page protein ligands links
Hydrolase PDB id
2b7x
Contents
Protein chains
157 a.a.
Ligands
SO4 ×8

References listed in PDB file
Key reference
Title Sequential reorganization of beta-Sheet topology by insertion of a single strand.
Authors M.Sagermann, W.A.Baase, B.W.Matthews.
Ref. Protein Sci, 2006, 15, 1085-1092. [DOI no: 10.1110/ps.052018006]
PubMed id 16597830
Abstract
Insertions, duplications, and deletions of sequence segments are thought to be major evolutionary mechanisms that increase the structural and functional diversity of proteins. Alternative splicing, for example, is an intracellular editing mechanism that is thought to generate isoforms for 30%-50% of all human genes. Whereas the inserted sequences usually display only minor structural rearrangements at the insertion site, recent observations indicate that they may also cause more dramatic structural displacements of adjacent structures. In the present study we test how artificially inserted sequences change the structure of the beta-sheet region in T4 lysozyme. Copies of two different beta-strands were inserted into two different loops of the beta-sheet, and the structures were determined. Not surprisingly, one insert "loops out" at its insertion site and forms a new small beta-hairpin structure. Unexpectedly, however, the second insertion leads to displacement of adjacent strands and a sequential reorganization of the beta-sheet topology. Even though the insertions were performed at two different sites, looping out occurred at the C-terminal end of the same beta-strand. Reasons as to why a non-native sequence would be recruited to replace that which occurs in the native protein are discussed. Our results illustrate how sequence insertions can facilitate protein evolution through both local and nonlocal changes in structure.
Figure 1.
Schematic representation of the [beta]-sheet of T4 lysozyme. The sheet structure consists of Strands I, II, and III and turns T-1, T-2, and T-3. The sequences to be inserted are shown in red. In mutant L30c, the inserted amino acid sequence corresponds to Strand II plus Turn T-2 and is inserted after Tyr24. In mutant L31d, the inserted sequence corresponds to Turn T-2 plus Strand III and is inserted after residue Leu33. The color-coding shown here is maintained in all figures.
Figure 2.
Illustration of some possible folds of the [beta]-sheet domain as a result of the insertion L30c. The inserted sequence (red) contains Strand II and Turn T-2. (A) In the simplest scenario, the inserted structure loops out at the insertion site, i.e., at Turn T-1. The neighboring structure retains the native conformation, leaving the identical parent sequence (yellow) unchanged. (B) In a second scenario, the insert sequence displaces the identical parent sequence, forcing it to loop out at Turn T-2. (C) In yet another scenario (the one that is observed), the sequence that is displaced in B continues so as to displace the sequence in Strand III. The structure will then be forced to loop out at T-3. In going from scenario B to C, the wild-type turn structure T-2 (Gly-Ile-Gly) is restored. In contrast, however, Strand II now replaces Strand III, causing substitutions in this region.
The above figures are reprinted from an Open Access publication published by the Protein Society: Protein Sci (2006, 15, 1085-1092) copyright 2006.
Secondary reference #1
Title Long distance conformation changes in a protein engineered by modulated sequence duplication
Authors M sagermann, L.Gay, B.W.Mattews.
Ref. proc natl acad sci usa, 2003, , 9191.
Secondary reference #2
Title Structural characterization of an engineered tandem repeat contrasts the importance of context and sequence in protein folding.
Authors M.Sagermann, W.A.Baase, B.W.Matthews.
Ref. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1999, 96, 6078-6083. [DOI no: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6078]
PubMed id 10339544
Full text Abstract
Figure 2.
Fig. 2. (A) Initial electron density showing the overall conformation of the duplicated sequence, as seen in space group P3[2]21. The WT* structure, omitting residues 36-42 (shown as a ribbon drawing) was subject to 10 cycles of rigid-body refinement in the mutant lysozyme cell. The calculated phases and structure factors, F[c], were used to calculate a map with amplitudes (F[mutant] F[c]) at 3.0-Å resolution. The density in the vicinity of the deleted residues, contoured at 2.5 , is shown. (B) Electron density after refinement of the inserted region in space group P3[2]21. Coefficients are (2F[o]-F[c]). The structure factors, F[c], and phases were calculated from the refined model including the inserted region. The resolution is 2.5 Å, and the map is contoured at 1.0 . (C) Superposition of the overall structure of the duplication mutant in space group P3[2]21 (blue bonds) on WT* lysozyme (green bonds). The inserted region in the mutant structure is highlighted in yellow.
Figure 3.
Fig. 3. (A) Map showing the initial electron density for the inserted region of molecule A in space group P2[1]. Amplitudes are (2F[o]-F[c]) weighted by REFMAC (15) where the structure factors, F[c], and phases were calculated from the refined model including the inserted region. The map was calculated at 2.5-Å resolution and contoured at 1.0 . The density in the vicinity of residues 40i-43i is not well defined and could not be fit by a well-defined model. (B) Electron density for molecule B of crystal form P2[1]. This map was calculated with the same coefficients, contouring, and resolution as in A. (C) Superposition of the C trace of the two copies of mutant L20 in crystal form P2[1] (molecule A, blue; molecule B, mauve) and wild-type T4 lysozyme (green). The sequence of the insert is highlighted in yellow for molecule A and in orange for molecule B. The structural rearrangements of loop 18-25 in molecule B are clearly visible. The superpositions were based on the -carbon atoms of residues 51-80 within the amino-terminal domain. Because of slight changes in the hinge-bending angle the C-terminal domains appear out of register although the respective structures within these regions are very similar.
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers

 

spacer

spacer