 |
PDBsum entry 1wwc
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Crystal structures of the neurotrophin-Binding domain of trka, Trkb and trkc.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
M.H.Ultsch,
C.Wiesmann,
L.C.Simmons,
J.Henrich,
M.Yang,
D.Reilly,
S.H.Bass,
A.M.De vos.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
J Mol Biol, 1999,
290,
149-159.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
The Trk receptors and their neurotrophin ligands control development and
maintenance of the nervous system. The crystal structures of the ligand binding
domain of TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC were solved and refined to high resolution. The
domains adopt an immunoglobulin-like fold, but crystallized in all three
instances as dimers with the N-terminal strand of each molecule replaced by the
same strand of a symmetry-related mate. Models of the correctly folded domains
could be constructed by changing the position of a single residue, and the
resulting model of the binding domain of TrkA is essentially identical with the
bound structure as observed in a complex with nerve growth factor. An analysis
of the existing mutagenesis data for TrkA and TrkC in light of these structures
reveals the structural reasons for the specificity among the Trk receptors, and
explains the underpinnings of the multi-functional ligands that have been
reported. The overall structure of all three domains belongs to the I-set of
immunoglobulin-like domains, but shows several unusual features, such as an
exposed disulfide bridge linking two neighboring strands in the same beta-sheet.
For all three domains, the residues that deviate from the standard fingerprint
pattern common to the I-set family fall in the region of the ligand binding site
observed in the complex. Therefore, identification of these deviations in the
sequences of other immunoglobulin-like domain-containing receptors may help to
identify their ligand binding site even in the absence of structural or
mutagenesis data.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. The relationship between the artifactual
dimers and the modeled monomers. One monomer is
colored red, the other green, and the hinge segment is
shown in yellow. The residue whose position is affected
by the remodeling is shown as a green or red dot.
(a) Topology diagram of the ABED sheet observed in
the crystal structures. (b) Topology of the ABED sheet
after remodeling the AB loop.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Models of the ligand-
binding domain of the Trk recep-
tors compared to the structure of
telokin. The b-strands are shown as
green arrows and labeled in TrkA-
d5 and telokin, a helical segment is
depicted as a red ribbon, and loops
are colored yellow and labeled in
TrkB-d5 and TrkC-d5. The exposed
disulfide bridge connecting strands
B and E in the Trk receptors is
shown in ball-and-stick rendering.
(a) TrkA-d5; (b) TrkB-d5; (c) TrkC-
d5; (d) telokin, with the cysteine
residues that usually (but not in tel-
okin) form a buried disulfide bond
shown in ball-and-stick rendering.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(1999,
290,
149-159)
copyright 1999.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |