 |
PDBsum entry 1sse
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription activator
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1sse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Structural basis for redox regulation of yap1 transcription factor localization.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
M.J.Wood,
G.Storz,
N.Tjandra.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Nature, 2004,
430,
917-921.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
The ability of organisms to alter their gene expression patterns in response to
environmental changes is essential for viability. A central regulator of the
response to oxidative stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the Yap1
transcription factor. Upon activation by increased levels of reactive oxygen
species, Yap1 rapidly redistributes to the nucleus where it regulates the
expression of up to 70 genes. Here we identify a redox-regulated domain of Yap1
and determine its high-resolution solution structure. In the active oxidized
form, a nuclear export signal (NES) in the carboxy-terminal cysteine-rich domain
is masked by disulphide-bond-mediated interactions with a conserved
amino-terminal alpha-helix. Point mutations that weaken the hydrophobic
interactions between the N-terminal alpha-helix and the C-terminal
NES-containing domain abolished redox-regulated changes in subcellular
localization of Yap1. Upon reduction of the disulphide bonds, Yap1 undergoes a
change to an unstructured conformation that exposes the NES and allows
redistribution to the cytoplasm. These results reveal the structural basis of
redox-dependent Yap1 localization and provide a previously unknown mechanism of
transcription factor regulation by reversible intramolecular disulphide bond
formation.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1: Schematic Yap1 structures and in vivo analysis of
Yap1-RD^GFP subcellular localization and oxidation. a, Yap1
contains three conserved regions: a basic leucine zipper DNA
binding domain (bZIP), an n-CRD (Asn279 to Arg313) and a c-CRD,
(Asn565 to Asn650). The NLS and NES are located at the N and C
termini, respectively. The Cys303 -Cys598 and Cys310 -Cys629
disulphide bonds are shown with red lines. The oxidized Yap1-RD
construct used for structure determination consisted of the
protease-resistant n-CRD and c-CRD domains. Yap1-RD^GFP
consisted of an SV40 NLS, GFP and residues Asn279 to Arg313
fused to residues Asn549 to Asn650 of Yap1. This fragment
encompasses the n-CRD and c-CRD sequences plus a small amount of
the native linker. b, Fluorescence microscopy of wild-type and
gpx3
cells expressing Yap1-RD^GFP from the native YAP1 promoter on a
CEN plasmid. c, Oxidized and reduced Yap1-RD^GFP extracted from
wild-type and gpx3
cells. Exponentially growing cells were either exposed to
H[2]O[2] or left untreated. Cell extracts were run on
non-reducing and reducing SDS -PAGE gels and probed with a GFP
antibody.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3: Inhibition of the Yap1 NES by the n- alpha- 1
helix. a, Ribbon diagram of the Yap1-RD structure with the
lowest energy shown in the same orientation as Fig. 2c. The n-
1
helix and the regions of c-CRD secondary structure are shown in
cyan and dark blue, respectively. The NES residues Ile614,
Val616, Leu619 and Leu623 are shown in green. These interact
with other hydrophobic core residues of the c-CRD, which are
shown in grey. b, The same ribbon diagram as in Fig. 3a, rotated
to show the n- 1
residues. The amphipathic n- 1
helix contains conserved hydrophobic residues, Phe302, Met306
and Val309, shown in red. c, Surface representation of the c-CRD
domain and its interaction with the hydrophobic residues in the
n- 1
helix. The surface of the NES residues Ile614, Val616, Leu619
and Leu623 are shown in green and Phe302, Met306 and Val309 in
red. d, Fluorescence microscopy of cells expressing Yap1-RD^GFP
F302A, M306A and V309A mutants, untreated or treated with
H[2]O[2] as carried out in Fig. 1b. e, Oxidized and reduced
Yap1-RD^GFP F302A, M306A and V309A mutants extracted from
exponentially growing cells untreated or treated with H[2]O[2].
The cell extracts were prepared as in Fig. 1c.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
Nature
(2004,
430,
917-921)
copyright 2004.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |