 |
PDBsum entry 1srv
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Taking mad to the extreme: ultrafast protein structure determination.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
M.A.Walsh,
I.Dementieva,
G.Evans,
R.Sanishvili,
A.Joachimiak.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr, 1999,
55,
1168-1173.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
Multiwavelength anomalous diffraction data were measured in 23 min from a 16 kDa
selenomethionyl substituted protein, producing experimental phases to 2.25 A
resolution. The data were collected on a mosaic 3 x 3 charge-coupled device
using undulator radiation from the Structural Biology Center 19ID beamline at
the Argonne National Laboratory's Advanced Photon Source. The phases were
independently obtained semiautomatically by two crystallographic program suites,
CCP4 and CNS. The quality and speed of this data acquisition exemplify the
opportunities at third-generation synchrotron sources for high-throughput
protein crystal structure determination.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3 Residue-based real-space map correlation coefficient
(RSCC; Brändén & Jones, 1990[Brändén,
C.-I. & Jones, T. A. (1990). Nature (London), 343, 687-689.])
for the experimental and DM solvent-flattened electron-density
maps for the AD of T. thermophilus chaperonin at 2.25 Å
resolution.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figure is
reprinted
by permission from the IUCr:
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr
(1999,
55,
1168-1173)
copyright 1999.
|
 |
|
Secondary reference #1
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
A structural model for groel-Polypeptide recognition.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
A.M.Buckle,
R.Zahn,
A.R.Fersht.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1997,
94,
3571-3575.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Fig. 2. (Top) Stereo cartoon representation of the structure
of the mini-chaperone (GroEL191-376), showing the interaction
between the N-terminal tag and a neighboring molecule in the
crystal lattice^ (related by a crystallographic two-fold screw
operation along the c axis, positioned approximately vertical
and in the plane^ of the paper). The N-terminal tag (residues
1 to 7) is
colored^ yellow. (Middle) Close-up of peptide-binding site
interactions, in stereo. The peptide is represented by yellow
bonds; neighboring residues are represented by white bonds.
Hydrogen bonds are represented^ by broken white lines. Drawn
with BOBSCRIPT (extensions to the^ program MOLSCRIPT; ref. 24)
and RASTER3D (25). (Lower) As in Middle but showing the
molecular surface of the mini-chaperone. The surface is colored
according to surface curvature to highlight concave surface
pockets. Convex, concave, and flat surfaces are^ colored green,
grey, and white, respectively. Residues underlying the surface
are labeled. Drawn with GRASP (26). All three figures show the
model in approximately the same orientation.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Fig. 4. (Upper) Stereoview of one heptameric ring of the
GroEL tetradecamer showing the position of the N-terminal tag
bound to each apical domain, near the opening to the central
cavity. This model is generated by the superposition of the
mini-chaperone GroEL(191-376) with each corresponding apical
domain (residues 191-376) in intact GroEL (the second ring of
the GroEL cylinder, generated by a two-fold^ symmetry operation,
is not shown, but stacks against the underside^ of the drawn
ring). GroEL subunits are colored around the ring going from
blue to green. Superimposed "bound peptides" are colored^ from
green to red. Drawn with RASMOL (32). (Lower) Cross-section of
the model shown in Upper looking directly at the inner wall of
the cavity, and showing the apical domains (cartoon with helices
H8 and H9 colored cyan) from three subunits with modeled
peptide^ (shown as space-filling models colored yellow, orange,
and red, respectively). Drawn with MOLSCRIPT (24) and RASTER3D
(25). Each of the separate peptides (residues 1 to 7) could be
linked^ together by small fragments of peptides so that a longer
peptide^ could bind from one contiguous site to the next.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |