PDBsum entry 1qyf

Luminescent protein

PDB id: 1qyf

Contents

Protein chain

225 a.a. *

Ligands

EDO

Metals

_MG

Waters ×275

* Residue conservation analysis

References listed in PDB file

Key reference

Title

Mechanism and energetics of green fluorescent protein chromophore synthesis revealed by trapped intermediate structures.

Authors

D.P.Barondeau, C.D.Putnam, C.J.Kassmann, J.A.Tainer, E.D.Getzoff.

Ref.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2003, 100, 12111-12116. [DOI no: 10.1073/pnas.2133463100]

PubMed id

14523232

Abstract

Green fluorescent protein has revolutionized cell labeling and molecular tagging, yet the driving force and mechanism for its spontaneous fluorophore synthesis are not established. Here we discover mutations that substantially slow the rate but not the yield of this posttranslational modification, determine structures of the trapped precyclization intermediate and oxidized postcyclization states, and identify unanticipated features critical to chromophore maturation. The protein architecture contains a dramatic approximately 80 degrees bend in the central helix, which focuses distortions at G67 to promote ring formation from amino acids S65, Y66, and G67. Significantly, these distortions eliminate potential helical hydrogen bonds that would otherwise have to be broken at an energetic cost during peptide cyclization and force the G67 nitrogen and S65 carbonyl oxygen atoms within van der Waals contact in preparation for covalent bond formation. Further, we determine that under aerobic, but not anaerobic, conditions the Gly-Gly-Gly chromophore sequence cyclizes and incorporates an oxygen atom. These results lead directly to a conjugation-trapping mechanism, in which a thermodynamically unfavorable cyclization reaction is coupled to an electronic conjugation trapping step, to drive chromophore maturation. Moreover, we propose primarily electrostatic roles for the R96 and E222 side chains in chromophore formation and suggest that the T62 carbonyl oxygen is the base that initiates the dehydration reaction. Our molecular mechanism provides the basis for understanding and eventually controlling chromophore creation.

Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Posttranslational modifications revealed by structures of GFP variants before and after backbone cyclization. Omit |F[o] - F[c]| electron density maps for the chromophore residues contoured at 3 (black). (a) The 1.50-Å cyclized R96A structure. (b) The 2.00-Å precyclization R96A intermediate A structure. (c) The 2.00-Å precyclization R96A intermediate B structure. (d and e) Orthogonal views of the 1.80-Å Gly-Gly-Gly aerobic oxidized postcyclization structure. (f) Proposed molecular structure of the Gly-Gly-Gly cyclized ring. (g) The 1.80-Å Gly-Gly-Gly anaerobic precyclization structure. All are illustrated inRASTER 3D (44).

Figure 3.
Fig. 3. The proposed conjugation-trapping mechanism for GFP chromophore formation. The chemical mechanism for GFP chromophore formation (Left) is displayed along with a cartoon representation of the corresponding reaction coordinate (Right). The reaction coordinates (x axis) for GFP (green) and a canonical -helix (red) are displayed against increasing energy for the chromophore residues (y axis), to highlight the three features favoring ring synthesis in the GFP scaffold: architectural distortions, R96 enhancement of the G67 nucleophile, and E222 stabilization of the dehydration transition state. (a) Peptide cyclization to generate a destabilized intermediate. (b) Dehydration, initiated by the T62 carbonyl, to trap the cyclized product through conjugation. (c) Oxidation to generate an aromatic imidazolone and conjugate the two ring systems. The chromophore images superimposed onto the cartoon are (from left to right) the R96A precyclization structure, model of cyclized intermediate, model of reduced intermediate and the R96A mature chromophore structure. Our data do not address the oxidation transition state (displayed as dashed lines).