 |
PDBsum entry 1qs9
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
The introduction of strain and its effects on the structure and stability of t4 lysozyme.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
R.Liu,
W.A.Baase,
B.W.Matthews.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
J Mol Biol, 2000,
295,
127-145.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
In order to try to better understand the role played by strain in the structure
and stability of a protein a series of "small-to-large" mutations was
made within the core of T4 lysozyme. Three different alanine residues, one
involved in backbone contacts, one in side-chain contacts, and the third
adjacent to a small cavity, were each replaced with subsets of the larger
residues, Val, Leu, Ile, Met, Phe and Trp. As expected, the protein is
progressively destabilized as the size of the introduced side-chain becomes
larger. There does, however, seem to be a limit to the destabilization,
suggesting that a protein of a given size may be capable of maintaining only a
certain amount of strain. The changes in stability vary greatly from site to
site. Substitution of larger residues for both Ala42 and Ala98 substantially
destabilize the protein, even though the primary contacts in one case are
predominantly with side-chain atoms and in the other with backbone. The results
suggest that it is neither practical nor meaningful to try to separate the
effects of introduced strain on side-chains from the effects on the backbone.
Substitutions at Ala129 are much less destabilizing than at sites 42 or 98. This
is most easily understood in terms of the pre-existing cavity, which provides
partial space to accommodate the introduced side-chains. Crystal structures were
obtained for a number of the mutants. These show that the changes in structure
to accommodate the introduced side-chains usually consist of essentially
rigid-body displacements of groups of linked atoms, achieved through relatively
small changes in torsion angles. On rare occasions, a side-chain close to the
site of substitution may change to a different rotamer. When such rotomer
changes occur, they permit the structure to dissipate strain by a response that
is plastic rather than elastic. In one case, a surface loop moves 1.2 A, not in
direct response to a mutation, but in an interaction mediated via an
intermolecular contact. It illustrates how the structure of a protein can be
modified by crystal contacts.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Superposition of the refined mutant structures
(open bonds) on the WT* model (filled bonds). The alignments are
based on the least-squares superposition of the main-chain atoms
of residues 81 to 161 for mutants at sites 98 and 129, while the
backbone atoms of residues 15 to 60 were used for mutant A42V.
Atom types are represented as in Figure 3. (a) A98C, (b) A98V,
(c) A98L, (d) A98M chain A, (e) A98M chain B, (f) A42V, (g)
A129F, (h) A129W.
|
 |
Figure 7.
Figure 7. The average (RMS) shift of the side-chain atoms
shown as a function of the distance from the site of mutation.
The plots include atoms in the domain within which the mutation
is located, and the structures were superimposed as in Figure 6.
The deviation at a distance of zero corresponds to the b-carbon
atom of the substituted residue. Atoms were not included if the
B-factor in WT* or in the mutant structure exceeded 50 Å2.
(a) A42V and A42S, (b) A98C, A98V and A98C, (c) A98M, (d) A129L,
A129M, A129F and A129W.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2000,
295,
127-145)
copyright 2000.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |