 |
PDBsum entry 1pv2
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
A new native echsp31 structure suggests a key role of structural flexibility for chaperone function.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
P.M.Quigley,
K.Korotkov,
F.Baneyx,
W.G.Hol.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Protein Sci, 2004,
13,
269-277.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
Heat shock proteins and proteases play a crucial role in cell survival under
conditions of environmental stress. The heat shock protein Hsp31, produced by
gene hchA at elevated temperatures in Escherichia coli, is a homodimeric protein
consisting of a large A domain and a smaller P domain connected by a linker. Two
catalytic triads are present per dimer, with the Cys and His contributed by the
A domain and an Asp by the P domain. A new crystal Form II confirms the dimer
and catalytic triad arrangement seen in the earlier crystal Form I. In addition,
several loops exhibit increased flexibility compared to the previous Hsp31 dimer
structure. In particular, loops D2 and D3 are intriguing because their mobility
leads to the exposure of a sizable hydrophobic patch made up by surface areas of
both subunits near the dimer interface. The residues creating this hydrophobic
surface are completely conserved in the Hsp31 family. At the same time, access
to the catalytic triad is increased. These observations lead to the hypothesis
for the functioning of Hsp31 wherein loops D2 and D3 play a key role: first, at
elevated temperatures, by becoming mobile and uncovering a large hydrophobic
area that helps in binding to client proteins, and second, by removing the
client protein from the hydrophobic patch when the temperature decreases and the
loops adopt their low-temperature positions at the Hsp31 surface. The proposed
mode of action of flexible loops in the functioning of Hsp31 may be a general
principle employed by other chaperones.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Comparison of Form I EcHsp31 (top) and Form II
EcHsp31 dimer (bottom). Molecular surface of dimers shown with
hydrophobic patches in green. Ribbon representation of dimers
are shown on the right in the same orientation. Red ribbons in
Form I EcHsp31 highlight regions that are disordered in the Form
II EcHsp31. Note that the differences (red) between Form I
EcHsp31 and Form II EcHsp31 dimer result in the exposure of more
hydrophobic regions (green patches) in Form II EcHsp31. These
areas are circled in black.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Molecular surface of Form II EcHsp31 with the
linker region from Form I EcHsp31 superimposed to show how Tyr
29 limits access to the active site pocket. The surface of Form
II EcHsp31 is colored by domain--A (blue), and P (green), and
Cys 185 (yellow). Regions D2 and D3 are modeled in red and
orange ball and stick representation from their relative
position Form I EcHsp31 structure. Close-up view of the access
to Cys 185 of the triad is shown for both Form I and Form II.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the Protein Society:
Protein Sci
(2004,
13,
269-277)
copyright 2004.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |