 |
PDBsum entry 1fnt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrolase/hydrolase activator
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1fnt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(+ 8 more)
198 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
Generate full PROCHECK analyses
|
PROCHECK summary for 1fnt
Ramachandran plot
PROCHECK statistics
1. Ramachandran Plot statistics
No. of
residues %-tage
------ ------
Most favoured regions [A,B,L] 6376 79.4%**
Additional allowed regions [a,b,l,p] 1401 17.5%
Generously allowed regions [~a,~b,~l,~p] 184 2.3%
Disallowed regions [XX] 67 0.8%*
---- ------
Non-glycine and non-proline residues 8028 100.0%
End-residues (excl. Gly and Pro) 110
Glycine residues 694
Proline residues 278
----
Total number of residues 9110
Based on an analysis of 118 structures of resolution of at least 2.0 Angstroms and R-factor no greater than 20.0 a good
quality model would be expected to have over 90% in the most favoured regions [A,B,L].
2. G-Factors
Average
Parameter Score Score
--------- ----- -----
Dihedral angles:-
Phi-psi distribution -0.72*
Chi1-chi2 distribution -0.77*
Chi1 only -0.20
Chi3 & chi4 0.35
Omega 0.54
-0.18
=====
Main-chain covalent forces:-
Main-chain bond lengths 0.48
Main-chain bond angles 0.19
0.31
=====
OVERALL AVERAGE 0.02
=====
G-factors provide a measure of how unusual, or out-of-the-ordinary, a property is.
Values below -0.5* - unusual
Values below -1.0** - highly unusual
Important note: The main-chain
bond-lengths and bond angles are compared with
the Engh & Huber (1991) ideal values derived
from small-molecule data. Therefore, structures
refined using different restraints may show
apparently large deviations from normality.
|
|
|
