 |
PDBsum entry 1fbk
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proton transport
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1fbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Molecular mechanism of vectorial proton translocation by bacteriorhodopsin.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
S.Subramaniam,
R.Henderson.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Nature, 2000,
406,
653-657.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
Bacteriorhodopsin, a membrane protein with a relative molecular mass of 27,000,
is a light driven pump which transports protons across the cell membrane of the
halophilic organism Halobacterium salinarum. The chromophore retinal is
covalently attached to the protein via a protonated Schiff base. Upon
illumination, retinal is isomerized. The Schiff base then releases a proton to
the extracellular medium, and is subsequently reprotonated from the cytoplasm.
An atomic model for bacteriorhodopsin was first determined by Henderson et al,
and has been confirmed and extended by work in a number of laboratories in the
last few years. Here we present an atomic model for structural changes involved
in the vectorial, light-driven transport of protons by bacteriorhodopsin. A
'switch' mechanism ensures the vectorial nature of pumping. First, retinal
unbends, triggered by loss of the Schiff base proton, and second, a protein
conformational change occurs. This conformational change, which we have
determined by electron crystallography at atomic (3.2 A in-plane and 3.6 A
vertical) resolution, is largely localized to helices F and G, and provides an
'opening' of the protein to protons on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1: Three-dimensional difference density map showing
structural changes in the D96G, F171C, F219L triple mutant
compared with the unilluminated native wild-type
bacteriorhodopsin. The view is from the cytoplasmic side
along an axis perpendicular to the plane of the membrane.
Diffraction patterns from two-dimensional crystals of the D96G,
F171C, F219L triple mutant^3 (provided by J. Tittor and D.
Oesterhelt) embedded in glucose or trehalose were recorded on a
Philips CM-12 electron microscope at a specimen temperature of
-180 °C using a CCD camera system^25. About 1,000
diffraction patterns were included in the initial set, from
which 402 patterns were chosen by visual inspection, and merged
together (merging R-factor of 17.3%) to generate a set of
lattice lines covering 87%
of (three-dimensional) reciprocal space, with a resolution of
3.2 Å in-plane and 3.6 Å vertically. Diffraction
intensities from the merged data set were scaled to those of
native bacteriorhodopsin. Three-dimensional difference maps (
F[triple] - F[native]) [native]
were calculated using experimental amplitudes for the triple
mutant (this work) and previously measured amplitudes and phases
for wild-type bacteriorhodopsin^ 26. The difference densities
are contoured at 3 .
Yellow, positive densities; purple, negative densities. a,
Section close to cytoplasmic boundary where the largest
structural differences are observed, with prominent features in
the vicinity of helices F and G. The difference densities near
helix F indicate an outward displacement of helix F in the
triple mutant. b, Section close to extracellular boundary. The
main change in this region is a positive feature localized to
the vicinity of Arg 82. The differences here are considerably
smaller than in the section in a.
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2: Comparison of atomic models for wild-type
bacteriorhodopsin and the D96G, F171C, F219L triple mutant.
a,b, Sections of [A]
weighted^27 2F[o]-F[c] density maps for wild-type
bacteriorhodopsin (purple) and the D96G, F171C, F219L triple
mutant (yellow) near the cytoplasmic (a) and extracellular (b)
boundaries. The maps are superimposed on the structure of
wild-type bacteriorhodopsin. Significant rearrangements of
helices F and G occur in the cytoplasmic, but not in the
extracellular region. c, Superposition of C atoms
of wild-type bacteriorhodopsin (purple) and the D96G, F171C,
F219L triple mutant (yellow) illustrating differences in the
cytoplasmic portions of helices F and G. Initially, a minimal
starting model containing only the transmembrane regions of
bacteriorhodopsin was used in a simplified least squares
refinement. Coordinates from six different starting models (PDB
entries 2brd, 1brr, 1ap9, 1brx, 1at9 and 2at9) were tested using
diffraction data sets obtained both from wild-type
bacteriorhodopsin and the triple mutant. The 1brr coordinates^28
were used as a starting model for the next stage of refinement
using the crystallography and NMR system (CNS)^27 suite of
programs, involving simulated annealing followed by temperature
factor refinement. The wild-type structure was refined to a
final R-factor of 23.9% (R[free] 31%), and the triple mutant
structure was refined to a final R-factor of 27.2% (R[ free]
32.1%). The final map was tested by completely omitting from the
starting model the side chains from a series of test residues
such as Phe 42, Trp 86, Trp 189 and Phe 208, or various
combinations of residues at the cytoplasmic ends of helix F or
helix G. In each case, difference maps (F[o]–F[c]) obtained at
the end of the refinement were unambiguous and clear density
peaks were observed for each of the omitted regions in
complete agreement with the atomic models reported here. As the
diffraction data from the triple mutant and wild-type
bacteriorhodopsin are completely independent of the 1brr
starting coordinates, these omit maps constitute stringent and
objective tests of the entire refinement procedure.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
Nature
(2000,
406,
653-657)
copyright 2000.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |