 |
PDBsum entry 1eyc
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Increasing the thermostability of staphylococcal nuclease: implications for the origin of protein thermostability.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
J.Chen,
Z.Lu,
J.Sakon,
W.E.Stites.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
J Mol Biol, 2000,
303,
125-130.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
Seven hyper-stable multiple mutants have been constructed in staphylococcal
nuclease by various combinations of eight different stabilizing single mutants.
The stabilities of these multiple mutants determined by guanidine hydrochloride
denaturation were 3.4 to 5.6 kcal/mol higher than that of the wild-type. Their
thermal denaturation midpoint temperatures were 12.6 to 22.9 deg. C higher than
that of the wild-type. These are among the greatest increases in protein
stability and thermal denaturation midpoint temperature relative to the
wild-type yet attained. There has been great interest in understanding how
proteins found in thermophilic organisms are stabilized. One frequently cited
theory is that the packing of hydrophobic side-chains is improved in the cores
of proteins isolated from thermophiles when compared to proteins from
mesophiles. The crystal structures of four single and five multiple stabilizing
mutants of staphylococcal nuclease were solved to high resolution. No large
overall structural change was found, with most changes localized around the
sites of mutation. Rearrangements were observed in the packing of side-chains in
the major hydrophobic core, although none of the mutations was in the core. It
is surprising that detailed structural analysis showed that packing had
improved, with the volume of the mutant protein's hydrophobic cores decreasing
as protein stability increased. Further, the number of van der Waals
interactions in the entire protein showed an experimentally significant increase
correlated with increasing stability. These results indicate that optimization
of packing follows as a natural consequence of increased protein thermostability
and that good packing is not necessarily the proximate cause of high stability.
Another popular theory is that thermostable proteins have more electrostatic and
hydrogen bonding interactions and these are responsible for the high
stabilities. The mutants here show that increased numbers of electrostatic and
hydrogen bonding interactions are not obligatory for large increases in protein
stability.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Plot of protein stability (DG[H[2]O]in kcal/mol)
versus the number of van der Waals interactions found in each
structure. The crystals of all proteins were obtained at methyl
pentane diol concentrations ranging from 40 to 60 % (v/v) in 25
mM sodium phosphate buffer of either pH 7 or 8. X-ray
diffraction data were collected using an R-AXIS IV. The
CuKaX-ray source was a Rigaku RU-H3RHB generator focused by
Osmic-type multilayer diffraction mirrors. Data reductions were
carried out using the program SCALEPACK. Manual model adjustment
was performed using InsightII and refinement of positional
parameters and B -factors used SHELX97. Structures have been
deposited in the RCSB Protein Data Bank with the following
accession numbers: wild-type 1EY0 and 1EYD, T33V 1EY5 and 1EZ8,
T41I 1EY6, S59A 1EY4, S128A 1EY7, GLA 1EY8, IGLA 1EY9 VIGLA
1EYA, IAGLA 1EYC, VIAGLA 1EZ6. The criteria for interaction was
to require the center to center distance for two non-bonded
atoms to be equal to or less than the sum of the van der Waals
radii plus 0.15 Å. This added distance was varied in 0.05
Å increments from zero to 0.3 Å. Although the
absolute number of contacts varied with interaction distance
cutoff, the rank order of the number of contacts found for
different mutants was nearly identical at each distance and
graphs similar to that above are obtained regardless of precise
cutoff distance. (A Table is available as Supplementary Material
that gives the number of interactions for each structure at each
distance cutoff). The values plotted for wild-type and T33V
contacts are the average found in three and two structures,
respectively. The standard deviation of number of contacts in
the three wild-type structures at this cutoff distance was
±9. However, the error bars are set at ±20
contacts, a more conservative value derived from observed
variations as structure refinements progressed. The greatest
standard deviation in the difference in contacts at any distance
cutoff for the three wild-type structures was ±14
contacts. The expected positional uncertainty in each atom
predicted from a Luzzati plot is 0.2 Å. The continuous
line is the least-squares fit with R2=0.6064.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figure is
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2000,
303,
125-130)
copyright 2000.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |