 |
PDBsum entry 1e5b
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
The structural basis for the ligand specificity of family 2 carbohydrate-Binding modules.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
P.J.Simpson,
H.Xie,
D.N.Bolam,
H.J.Gilbert,
M.P.Williamson.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
J Biol Chem, 2000,
275,
41137-41142.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
The interactions of proteins with polysaccharides play a key role in the
microbial hydrolysis of cellulose and xylan, the most abundant organic molecules
in the biosphere, and are thus pivotal to the recycling of photosynthetically
fixed carbon. Enzymes that attack these recalcitrant polymers have a modular
structure comprising catalytic modules and non-catalytic carbohydrate-binding
modules (CBMs). The largest prokaryotic CBM family, CBM2, contains members that
bind cellulose (CBM2a) and xylan (CBM2b), respectively. A possible explanation
for the different ligand specificity of CBM2b is that one of the surface
tryptophans involved in the protein-carbohydrate interaction is rotated by 90
degrees compared with its position in CBM2a (thus matching the structure of the
binding site to the helical secondary structure of xylan), which may be promoted
by a single amino acid difference between the two families. Here we show that by
mutation of this single residue (Arg-262-->Gly), a CBM2b xylan-binding module
completely loses its affinity for xylan and becomes a cellulose-binding module.
The structural effect of the mutation has been revealed using NMR spectroscopy,
which confirms that Trp-259 rotates 90 degrees to lie flat against the protein
surface. Except for this one residue, the mutation only results in minor changes
to the structure. The mutated protein interacts with cellulose using the same
residues that the wild-type CBM2b uses to interact with xylan, suggesting that
the recognition is of the secondary structure of the polysaccharide rather than
any specific recognition of the absence or presence of functional groups.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Fig. 2. The major functional difference between CBM
Families 2a and 2b. MOLSCRIPT (28) depictions of the key surface
tryptophan, and the residue (Gly or Arg) that determines its
orientation.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Fig. 4. Structure of R262G in a stereo view of the
backbone for an ensemble of 33 structures, superimposed for best
fit on the lowest energy structure. Trp-259 and Trp-291
sidechains are indicated.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the ASBMB:
J Biol Chem
(2000,
275,
41137-41142)
copyright 2000.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |