 |
PDBsum entry 1d5r
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
Crystal structure of the pten tumor suppressor: implications for its phosphoinositide phosphatase activity and membrane association.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
J.O.Lee,
H.Yang,
M.M.Georgescu,
A.Di cristofano,
T.Maehama,
Y.Shi,
J.E.Dixon,
P.Pandolfi,
N.P.Pavletich.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Cell, 1999,
99,
323-334.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
The PTEN tumor suppressor is mutated in diverse human cancers and in hereditary
cancer predisposition syndromes. PTEN is a phosphatase that can act on both
polypeptide and phosphoinositide substrates in vitro. The PTEN structure reveals
a phosphatase domain that is similar to protein phosphatases but has an enlarged
active site important for the accommodation of the phosphoinositide substrate.
The structure also reveals that PTEN has a C2 domain. The PTEN C2 domain binds
phospholipid membranes in vitro, and mutation of basic residues that could
mediate this reduces PTEN's membrane affinity and its ability to suppress the
growth of glioblastoma tumor cells. The phosphatase and C2 domains associate
across an extensive interface, suggesting that the C2 domain may serve to
productively position the catalytic domain on the membrane.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. The PTEN Phosphatase Domain Has the Same Fold as
the Dual Specificity Phosphatase VHR, but the Structure Differs
around the Active Site(A) Superimposition of the PTEN
phosphatase domain and VHR structures. The structural elements
around the active site that differ in the two structures—the
pβ2-α1, “TI”, and “WPD” loops—are in blue for PTEN
and green for VHR.(B) Slice of the active site molecular
surface, represented as a wire mesh, shows the larger size of
the PTEN active site pocket compared to VHR and PTP1B. View is
rotated approximately 180° about the vertical axis of Figure
2A.(C) Comparison of the active site structural elements and
active site residues of PTEN, VHR, and PTP1B. Blue, green, and
magenta spheres near the catalytic Cys-124 indicate the
positions of a carboxylate carbon of tartrate in PTEN, the
sulfur atom of sulfate in VHR, and the phosphorous atom of
phosphotyrosine in PTP1B, respectively. PTEN residues are
labeled, and residues of VHR and PTP1B are labeled only when
they differ from PTEN. Orientation as in Figure 2B.(D) Close-up
view of the PTEN active site, showing the contacts made with the
tartrate molecule (green dotted lines). Fo-Fc difference
electron density around the tartrate molecule is shown in
magenta. The map was calculated at 2.1 Å using a PTEN
model before any tartrate atoms were built; it was contoured at
2.5 σ.
|
 |
Figure 6.
Figure 6. The PTEN Phosphatase and C2 Domains Pack across
an Extensive Interface that Is Targeted by Tumorigenic
Mutations(A) The interface consists of the “WPD” loop,
“TI” loop, and pα6 helix from the phosphatase domain
(blue), and cβ5, cβ6, cα1, and cα2 from the C2 domain
(magenta). The hydrogen bond networks in the interface are shown
as green dotted lines.(B) Superposition of PTEN (red) and PLCδ1
(green). Their C2 domains are shown as backbone traces, and
their respective catalytic domains as dot surfaces. The active
sites in both cases are located on the same face with the CBR3
loops.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Cell
(1999,
99,
323-334)
copyright 1999.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |