 |
PDBsum entry 1b5a
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electron transport
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1b5a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References listed in PDB file
|
 |
|
Key reference
|
 |
|
Title
|
 |
The origin of differences in the physical properties of the equilibrium forms of cytochrome b5 revealed through high-Resolution nmr structures and backbone dynamic analyses.
|
 |
|
Authors
|
 |
B.Dangi,
S.Sarma,
C.Yan,
D.L.Banville,
R.D.Guiles.
|
 |
|
Ref.
|
 |
Biochemistry, 1998,
37,
8289-8302.
[DOI no: ]
|
 |
|
PubMed id
|
 |
|
 |
|
Note In the PDB file this reference is
annotated as "TO BE PUBLISHED".
The citation details given above were identified by an automated
search of PubMed on title and author
names, giving a
percentage match of
94%.
|
 |
 |
|
Abstract
|
 |
|
On the basis of a comparison of high-resolution solution structures calculated
for both equilibrium forms of rat ferrocytochrome b5, differences in reduction
potential and thermodyanmic stability have been characterized in terms of
significant structural and dynamic differences between the two forms. The
dominant difference between A and B conformations has long been known to be due
to a 180 degrees rotation of the heme in the binding pocket about an axis
defined by the alpha- and gamma-meso carbons, however, the B form has not been
structurally characterized until now. The most significant differences observed
between the two forms were the presence of a hydrogen bond between the
7-propionate and the S64 amide in the A form but not the B form and surprisingly
a displacement of the heme out of the binding pocket by 0.9 A in the B form
relative to the A form. The magnitude of other factors which could contribute to
the known difference in reduction potentials in the bovine protein [Walker, F.
A., Emrick, D., Rivera, J. E., Hanquet, B. J., and Buttlaire, D. H. (1988) J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 110, 6234-6240], such as differences in the orientation of the
axial imidazoles and differences in hydrogen bond strength to the imidazoles,
have been evaluated. The dominant effector of the reduction potential would
appear to be the lack of the hydrogen bond to the S64 amide in the B form which
frees up the propionate to charge stabilize the iron in the oxidized state and
thus lower the reduction potential of the B form. The structure we report for
the A form, based on heteronuclear NMR restraints, involving a total of 1288
restraints strongly resembles both the X-ray crystal structure of the bovine
protein and a recently reported structure for the A form of the rat protein
based on homonuclear data alone [Banci, L., Bertini, I., Ferroni, F., and
Rosato, A. (1997) Eur. J. Biochem. 249, 270-279]. The rmsd for the backbone
atoms of the A form is 0.54 A (0.92 A for all non-hydrogens). The rmsd for the
backbone of the B form is 0.51 A (0. 90 A for all non-hydrogen atoms). An
analysis of backbone dynamics based on a model-free analysis of 15N relaxation
data, which incorporated axially symmetric diffusion tensor modeling of the
cytochrome, indicates that the protein is more rigid in the reduced state
relative to the oxidized state, based on a comparison with order parameters
reported for the bovine protein in the oxidized state [Kelly, G. P., Muskett, F.
W., and Whitford, D. (1997) Eur. J. Biochem. 245, 349-354].
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |