Figure 4 - full size

Figure 4.
Fig. 4. Model of adhesion-regulated RPTPµ signaling. Cadherins [ectodomains shown in orange, PDB entry 1L3W (29)] establish intercellular contacts via trans interactions, as well as cis interactions (black arrow) (2, 29). RPTPµ (shown in blue) trans interactions are pH sensitive (8, 18), which is consistent with the polar nature of the interface, and therefore cannot form at the low pH of the secretory pathway. Cell surface RPTPµ molecules rapidly recirculate, unless there is an appropriate recognition match (5). Trans RPTPµ dimerization may be complemented by weak interactions in cis (black arrow and question mark) (8, 15). RPTPµ can stabilize the cadherin-catenin complex [drawn schematically: -catenin (yellow circles), ß-catenin (light green ovals), and p120-catenin (dark green ovals)] by dephosphorylation (3)(red arrows). Type IIB RPTPs are processed in multiple proteolytic steps (5, 13, 14). Protein convertases (in the trans-Golgi network) nick the FN4 domain (13, 14), potentially contributing flexibility. ADAM 10 cleaves close to the membrane (thick gray lines), causing the shedding of RPTPµ (5, 14) and cadherin (36) ectodomains. Subsequent -secretase–dependent intramembrane cleavage releases the RPTPµ intracellular region (blue ovals) (14). The cadherin and RPTPµ ectodomains (crystal structures drawn to the same scale) are shown perpendicular to the cell surface to simplify the figure. EM analysis of adherens junctions and desmosomes has revealed the possibility of non-orthogonal orientations with respect to the membrane surface [with variable tilt angles (28, 31)], but it is not clear to what extent this is caused by sample preparation procedures or flexibility of the juxtamembrane regions.