 |
PDBsum entry 6hcd
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nuclear protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
6hcd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Nuclear protein
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Structure of universal stress protein from archaeoglobus fulgidus
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Universal stress protein. Chain: a, b, c, d. Engineered: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Archaeoglobus fulgidus. Organism_taxid: 2234. Gene: af_0826. Expressed in: escherichia coli bl21(de3). Expression_system_taxid: 469008. Expression_system_variant: codonplus ril.
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
1.90Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.169
|
R-free:
|
0.207
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
I.A.Shumilin,J.I.Loch,M.Cymborowski,X.Xu,A.Edwards,R.Di Leo, I.G.Shabalin,A.Joachimiak,A.Savchenko,W.Minor,Midwest Center For Structural Genomics (Mcsg)
|
|
Key ref:
|
 |
K.L.Tkaczuk
et al.
(2013).
Structural and functional insight into the universal stress protein family.
Evol Appl,
6,
434-449.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
14-Aug-18
|
Release date:
|
29-Aug-18
|
|
|
Supersedes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Evol Appl
6:434-449
(2013)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structural and functional insight into the universal stress protein family.
|
|
K.L.Tkaczuk,
I.A Shumilin,
M.Chruszcz,
E.Evdokimova,
A.Savchenko,
W.Minor.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
We present the crystal structures of two universal stress proteins (USP) from
Archaeoglobus fulgidus and Nitrosomonas europaea in both apo- and ligand-bound
forms. This work is the first complete synthesis of the structural properties of
26 USP available in the Protein Data Bank, over 75% of which were determined by
structure genomics centers with no additional information provided. The results
of bioinformatic analyses of all available USP structures and their sequence
homologs revealed that these two new USP structures share overall structural
similarity with structures of USPs previously determined. Clustering and
cladogram analyses, however, show how they diverge from other members of the USP
superfamily and show greater similarity to USPs from organisms inhabiting
extreme environments. We compared them with other archaeal and bacterial USPs
and discuss their similarities and differences in context of structure,
sequential motifs, and potential function. We also attempted to group all
analyzed USPs into families, so that assignment of the potential function to
those with no experimental data available would be possible by extrapolation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
');
}
}
 |
|