spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 6ecr

Go to PDB code: 
protein ligands Protein-protein interface(s) links
Oxidoreductase PDB id
6ecr

 

 

 

 

Loading ...

 
JSmol PyMol  
Contents
Protein chains
285 a.a.
Ligands
NAP ×2
ACT
Waters ×223
PDB id:
6ecr
Name: Oxidoreductase
Title: The human methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase/cyclohydrolase (fold) complexed with NADP
Structure: Methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase cyclohydrolase. Chain: a, b. Synonym: c1-thf synthase. Engineered: yes
Source: Homo sapiens. Human. Organism_taxid: 9606. Gene: mthfd1, mthfc, mthfd. Expressed in: escherichia coli bl21(de3). Expression_system_taxid: 469008
Resolution:
2.20Å     R-factor:   0.175     R-free:   0.219
Authors: R.V.Bueno,A.Dawson,W.N.Hunter
Key ref: R.Bueno et al. (2019). An assessment of three human methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase/cyclohydrolase-ligand complexes following further refinement. Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun, 75, 148-152. PubMed id: 30839287 DOI: 10.1107/S2053230X18018083
Date:
08-Aug-18     Release date:   27-Mar-19    
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers
 References

Protein chains
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
P11586  (C1TC_HUMAN) -  C-1-tetrahydrofolate synthase, cytoplasmic from Homo sapiens
Seq:
Struc:
 
Seq:
Struc:
935 a.a.
285 a.a.*
Key:    PfamA domain  Secondary structure
* PDB and UniProt seqs differ at 1 residue position (black cross)

 Enzyme reactions 
   Enzyme class 1: E.C.1.5.1.5  - methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (NADP(+)).
[IntEnz]   [ExPASy]   [KEGG]   [BRENDA]

      Pathway:
Folate Coenzymes
      Reaction: (6R)-5,10-methylene-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolate + NADP+ = (6R)-5,10- methenyltetrahydrofolate + NADPH
(6R)-5,10-methylene-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolate
+
NADP(+)
Bound ligand (Het Group name = NAP)
corresponds exactly
= (6R)-5,10- methenyltetrahydrofolate
+ NADPH
   Enzyme class 2: E.C.3.5.4.9  - methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase.
[IntEnz]   [ExPASy]   [KEGG]   [BRENDA]

      Pathway:
      Reaction: (6R)-5,10-methenyltetrahydrofolate + H2O = (6R)-10-formyltetrahydrofolate + H+
5,10-methenyltetrahydrofolate
+ H2O
= (6S)-10-formyltetrahydrofolate
+ H(+)
   Enzyme class 3: E.C.6.3.4.3  - formate--tetrahydrofolate ligase.
[IntEnz]   [ExPASy]   [KEGG]   [BRENDA]

      Pathway:
      Reaction: (6S)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolate + formate + ATP = (6R)-10- formyltetrahydrofolate + ADP + phosphate
(6S)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolate
+ formate
+
ATP
Bound ligand (Het Group name = ACT)
matches with 75.00% similarity
= (6R)-10- formyltetrahydrofolate
+
ADP
Bound ligand (Het Group name = NAP)
matches with 56.25% similarity
+ phosphate
Note, where more than one E.C. class is given (as above), each may correspond to a different protein domain or, in the case of polyprotein precursors, to a different mature protein.
Molecule diagrams generated from .mol files obtained from the KEGG ftp site

 

 
    reference    
 
 
DOI no: 10.1107/S2053230X18018083 Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun 75:148-152 (2019)
PubMed id: 30839287  
 
 
An assessment of three human methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase/cyclohydrolase-ligand complexes following further refinement.
R.Bueno, A.Dawson, W.N.Hunter.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
The enzymes involved in folate metabolism are key drug targets for cell-growth modulation, and accurate crystallographic structures provide templates to be exploited for structure-based ligand design. In this context, three ternary complex structures of human methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase/cyclohydrolase have been published [Schmidt et al. (2000), Biochemistry, 39, 6325-6335] and potentially represent starting points for the development of new antifolate inhibitors. However, an inspection of the models and the deposited data revealed deficiencies and raised questions about the validity of the structures. A number of inconsistencies relating to the publication were also identified. Additional refinement was carried out with the deposited data, seeking to improve the models and to then validate the complex structures or correct the record. In one case, the inclusion of the inhibitor in the structure was supported and alterations to the model allowed details of enzyme-ligand interactions to be described that had not previously been discussed. For one weak inhibitor, the data suggested that the ligand may adopt two poses in the binding site, both with few interactions with the enzyme. In the third case, that of a potent inhibitor, inconsistencies were noted in the assignment of the chemical structure and there was no evidence to support the inclusion of the ligand in the active site.
 

 

spacer

spacer