 |
PDBsum entry 5zjs
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription/DNA
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
5zjs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Transcription/DNA
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Structure of abdb/exd complex bound to a 'blue14' DNA sequence
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Homeobox protein abdominal-b. Chain: a. Synonym: infraabdominal 7,iab-7,p3,ph189. Engineered: yes. Homeobox protein extradenticle. Chain: b. Synonym: dpbx. Engineered: yes. DNA (5'-d( Gp Tp Cp Ap Tp Tp Ap Ap Tp Cp Ap Tp Gp C)-3').
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Drosophila melanogaster. Fruit fly. Organism_taxid: 7227. Gene: abd-b, cg10291. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562. Gene: exd, cg8933. Synthetic: yes. Organism_taxid: 7227
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
2.90Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.255
|
R-free:
|
0.281
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
N.Baburajendran,T.Zeiske,A.Kaczynska,R.Mann,B.Honig,L.Shapiro, A.G.Palmer
|
|
Key ref:
|
 |
T.Zeiske
et al.
(2018).
Intrinsic DNA Shape Accounts for Affinity Differences between Hox-Cofactor Binding Sites.
Cell Rep,
24,
2221-2230.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
22-Mar-18
|
Release date:
|
29-Aug-18
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Cell Rep
24:2221-2230
(2018)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Intrinsic DNA Shape Accounts for Affinity Differences between Hox-Cofactor Binding Sites.
|
|
T.Zeiske,
N.Baburajendran,
A.Kaczynska,
J.Brasch,
A.G.Palmer,
L.Shapiro,
B.Honig,
R.S.Mann.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Transcription factors bind to their binding sites over a wide range of
affinities, yet how differences in affinity are encoded in DNA sequences is not
well understood. Here, we report X-ray crystal structures of four heterodimers
of the Hox protein AbdominalB bound with its cofactor Extradenticle to four
target DNA molecules that differ in affinity by up to ∼20-fold. Remarkably,
despite large differences in affinity, the overall structures are very similar
in all four complexes. In contrast, the predicted shapes of the DNA binding
sites (i.e., the intrinsic DNA shape) in the absence of bound protein are
strikingly different from each other and correlate with affinity: binding sites
that must change conformations upon protein binding have lower affinities than
binding sites that have more optimal conformations prior to binding. Together,
these observations suggest that intrinsic differences in DNA shape provide a
robust mechanism for modulating affinity without affecting other protein-DNA
interactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
');
}
}
 |
|