spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 5p5o

Go to PDB code: 
protein links
Hydrolase PDB id
5p5o

 

 

 

 

Loading ...

 
JSmol PyMol  
Contents
Protein chain
330 a.a.
Waters ×255
PDB id:
5p5o
Name: Hydrolase
Title: Automated refinement of diffraction data obtained from an endothiapepsin crystal treated with fragment 249
Structure: Endothiapepsin. Chain: a. Ec: 3.4.23.22
Source: Cryphonectria parasitica. Organism_taxid: 5116
Resolution:
1.20Å     R-factor:   0.122     R-free:   0.137
Authors: J.Schiebel,A.Heine,G.Klebe
Key ref: J.Schiebel et al. (2016). High-Throughput Crystallography: Reliable and Efficient Identification of Fragment Hits. Structure, 24, 1398-1409. PubMed id: 27452405 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2016.06.010
Date:
28-Jun-16     Release date:   03-Aug-16    
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers
 References

Protein chain
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
P11838  (CARP_CRYPA) -  Endothiapepsin from Cryphonectria parasitica
Seq:
Struc:
419 a.a.
330 a.a.
Key:    PfamA domain  Secondary structure  CATH domain

 Enzyme reactions 
   Enzyme class: E.C.3.4.23.22  - endothiapepsin.
[IntEnz]   [ExPASy]   [KEGG]   [BRENDA]
      Reaction: Hydrolysis of proteins with broad specificity similar to that of pepsin A, preferring hydrophobic residues at P1 and P1', but does not cleave 14-Ala-|-Leu-15 in the B chain of insulin or Z-Glu-Tyr. Clots milk.

 

 
DOI no: 10.1016/j.str.2016.06.010 Structure 24:1398-1409 (2016)
PubMed id: 27452405  
 
 
High-Throughput Crystallography: Reliable and Efficient Identification of Fragment Hits.
J.Schiebel, S.G.Krimmer, K.Röwer, A.Knörlein, X.Wang, A.Y.Park, M.Stieler, F.R.Ehrmann, K.Fu, N.Radeva, M.Krug, F.U.Huschmann, S.Glöckner, M.S.Weiss, U.Mueller, G.Klebe, A.Heine.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
Today the identification of lead structures for drug development often starts from small fragment-like molecules raising the chances to find compounds that successfully pass clinical trials. At the heart of the screening for fragments binding to a specific target, crystallography delivers structural information essential for subsequent drug design. While it is common to search for bound ligands in electron densities calculated directly after an initial refinement cycle, we raise the important question whether this strategy is viable for fragments characterized by low affinities. Here, we describe and provide a collection of high-quality diffraction data obtained from 364 protein crystals treated with diverse fragments. Subsequent data analysis showed that ∼25% of all hits would have been missed without further refining the resulting structures. To enable fast and reliable hit identification, we have designed an automated refinement pipeline that will inspire the development of optimized tools facilitating the successful application of fragment-based methods.
 

 

spacer

spacer