 |
PDBsum entry 5cu5
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Biol Chem
290:26021-26032
(2015)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structural Basis for Antigenic Peptide Recognition and Processing by Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Aminopeptidase 2.
|
|
A.Mpakali,
P.Giastas,
N.Mathioudakis,
I.M.Mavridis,
E.Saridakis,
E.Stratikos.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) aminopeptidases process antigenic peptide precursors
to generate epitopes for presentation by MHC class I molecules and help shape
the antigenic peptide repertoire and cytotoxic T-cell responses. To perform this
function, ER aminopeptidases have to recognize and process a vast variety of
peptide sequences. To understand how these enzymes recognize substrates, we
determined crystal structures of ER aminopeptidase 2 (ERAP2) in complex with a
substrate analogue and a peptidic product to 2.5 and 2.7 Å, respectively, and
compared them to the apo-form structure determined to 3.0 Å. The peptides were
found within the internal cavity of the enzyme with no direct access to the
outside solvent. The substrate analogue extends away from the catalytic center
toward the distal end of the internal cavity, making interactions with several
shallow pockets along the path. A similar configuration was evident for the
peptidic product, although decreasing electron density toward its C terminus
indicated progressive disorder. Enzymatic analysis confirmed that visualized
interactions can either positively or negatively impact in vitro trimming rates.
Opportunistic side-chain interactions and lack of deep specificity pockets
support a limited-selectivity model for antigenic peptide processing by ERAP2.
In contrast to proposed models for the homologous ERAP1, no specific recognition
of the peptide C terminus by ERAP2 was evident, consistent with functional
differences in length selection and self-activation between these two enzymes.
Our results suggest that ERAP2 selects substrates by sequestering them in its
internal cavity and allowing opportunistic interactions to determine trimming
rates, thus combining substrate permissiveness with sequence bias.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
');
}
}
 |