 |
PDBsum entry 3e66
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Splicing
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Crystal structure of the beta-finger domain of yeast prp8
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Prp8. Chain: a, b. Fragment: beta-finger domain: unp residues 1822-2095. Synonym: pre-mRNA-splicing factor 8. Engineered: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Organism_taxid: 4932. Gene: prp8, dbf3, dna39, rna8, slt21, usa2. Expressed in: escherichia coli.
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
2.05Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.214
|
R-free:
|
0.236
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
K.Yang,L.Zhang,T.Xu,A.Heroux,R.Zhao
|
Key ref:
|
 |
K.Yang
et al.
(2008).
Crystal structure of the beta-finger domain of Prp8 reveals analogy to ribosomal proteins.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
105,
13817-13822.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
14-Aug-08
|
Release date:
|
14-Oct-08
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P33334
(PRP8_YEAST) -
Pre-mRNA-splicing factor 8 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain ATCC 204508 / S288c)
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
2413 a.a.
255 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
 |
CATH domain |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
105:13817-13822
(2008)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Crystal structure of the beta-finger domain of Prp8 reveals analogy to ribosomal proteins.
|
|
K.Yang,
L.Zhang,
T.Xu,
A.Heroux,
R.Zhao.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Prp8 stands out among hundreds of splicing factors as a key regulator of
spliceosome activation and a potential cofactor of the splicing reaction. We
present here the crystal structure of a 274-residue domain (residues
1,822-2,095) near the C terminus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Prp8. The most
striking feature of this domain is a beta-hairpin finger protruding out of the
protein (hence, this domain will be referred to as the beta-finger domain),
resembling many globular ribosomal proteins with protruding extensions.
Mutations throughout the beta-finger change the conformational equilibrium
between the first and the second catalytic step. Mutations at the base of the
beta-finger affect U4/U6 unwinding-mediated spliceosome activation. Prp8 may
insert its beta-finger into the first-step complex (U2/U5/U6/pre-mRNA) or
U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP and stabilize these complexes. Mutations on the beta-finger
likely alter these interactions, leading to the observed mutant phenotypes. Our
results suggest a possible mechanism of how Prp8 regulates spliceosome
activation. These results also demonstrate an analogy between a spliceosomal
protein and ribosomal proteins that insert extensions into folded rRNAs and
stabilize the ribosome.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Structure of the β-finger domain of yPrp8. (A) The β-finger
domain structure is colored in a rainbow spectrum from the N
terminus to the C terminus, with secondary structures labeled.
(B) The most striking feature of the β-finger domain is a
protruding β-finger which adopts different conformations in the
two molecules (yellow and cyan) in the asymmetric unit of the
crystal. (C) The N-terminal α/β subdomain of the β-finger
domain (cyan) is topologically similar to the RNase H fold as
exemplified by the RNase H domain in the C-terminal of UvrC
(yellow) (PDB ID code 2NRR). The extra α-helix and β-strand
that are present in the β-finger domain but not in UvrC are
labeled with arrows. Residues in Prp8 that correspond to the DDE
active sites in RNase H are shown in purple. (D) The β-finger
domain contains first-step alleles (purple), second-step alleles
(red), and U4-cs1 suppressors (black). Brown designates the
residue that confers both the first-step allele and U4-cs-1
suppressor phenotypes. (E) Examples of two ribosomal proteins
(S10 and L22) with β-finger extensions.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Copper-resistance and U4-cs1 suppression analyses of various
β-finger mutations. (A) All β-finger mutations grow similarly
to the WT at 30°C, 18°C, and 37°C. Only one
concentration point in the serial dilution is shown. (B)
Copper-resistance assay indicates that V1860D, T1865K, A1871E,
and T1872E grow worse than the WT in both the BSG and UuG
reporters at 0.05 mM Cu^++ concentration, characteristic of
first-step alleles. Mutant H1863E grows better than the WT in
both the BSG and UuG reporters at 0.2 mM Cu^++ concentration,
characteristic of second-step alleles. V1862D behaves similarly
to the WT and does not demonstrate a clear first- or second-step
allele phenotype. Known first-step allele R1753K and second-step
allele prp8–162 (V1870N) are used as positive controls and
labeled with +. (C) Primer extension experiment indicates that
V1860D, T1865K, A1871E, and T1872E are first-step alleles, which
demonstrate increased lariat intermediate, reduced mRNA product,
and reduced second-step efficiency compared with the WT. H1863E
is a second-step allele, which demonstrates decreased lariat
intermediate, increased mRNA product, and increased second-step
efficiency compared to the WT. V1862D is neither a clear first-
nor second-step allele. R1753K and prp8–162 (V1870N) are used
as positive controls for first and second-step alleles, and the
corresponding lanes are labeled with +. pBR322 DNA digested with
MspI is used as a molecular weight marker. (D) V1860D (positive
control, designated with +) but no other β-finger mutants
tested suppress the U4-cs1 phenotype at 18°C. Only one
concentration point in the serial dilution is shown.
|
 |
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
C.C.Query,
and
M.M.Konarska
(2013).
Structural biology: Spliceosome's core exposed.
|
| |
Nature,
493,
615-616.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.P.Galej,
C.Oubridge,
A.J.Newman,
and
K.Nagai
(2013).
Crystal structure of Prp8 reveals active site cavity of the spliceosome.
|
| |
Nature,
493,
638-643.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
W.Yang
(2011).
Nucleases: diversity of structure, function and mechanism.
|
| |
Q Rev Biophys,
44,
1.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.M.Golas,
B.Sander,
S.Bessonov,
M.Grote,
E.Wolf,
B.Kastner,
H.Stark,
and
R.Lührmann
(2010).
3D cryo-EM structure of an active step I spliceosome and localization of its catalytic core.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
40,
927-938.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Valadkhan,
and
Y.Jaladat
(2010).
The spliceosomal proteome: at the heart of the largest cellular ribonucleoprotein machine.
|
| |
Proteomics,
10,
4128-4141.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Maeder,
A.K.Kutach,
and
C.Guthrie
(2009).
ATP-dependent unwinding of U4/U6 snRNAs by the Brr2 helicase requires the C terminus of Prp8.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
16,
42-48.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.A.Brow
(2009).
Eye on RNA unwinding.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
16,
7-8.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.J.Smith,
and
M.M.Konarska
(2009).
A critical assessment of the utility of protein-free splicing systems.
|
| |
RNA,
15,
1-3.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Michel,
M.Costa,
and
E.Westhof
(2009).
The ribozyme core of group II introns: a structure in want of partners.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci,
34,
189-199.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Zhang,
T.Xu,
C.Maeder,
L.O.Bud,
J.Shanks,
J.Nix,
C.Guthrie,
J.A.Pleiss,
and
R.Zhao
(2009).
Structural evidence for consecutive Hel308-like modules in the spliceosomal ATPase Brr2.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
16,
731-739.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.C.Wahl,
C.L.Will,
and
R.Lührmann
(2009).
The spliceosome: design principles of a dynamic RNP machine.
|
| |
Cell,
136,
701-718.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Nowotny
(2009).
Retroviral integrase superfamily: the structural perspective.
|
| |
EMBO Rep,
10,
144-151.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Toor,
K.S.Keating,
and
A.M.Pyle
(2009).
Structural insights into RNA splicing.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
19,
260-266.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.E.Butcher
(2009).
The spliceosome as ribozyme hypothesis takes a second step.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
106,
12211-12212.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Valadkhan,
and
J.L.Manley
(2009).
The use of simple model systems to study spliceosomal catalysis.
|
| |
RNA,
15,
4-7.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.B.Ritchie,
M.J.Schellenberg,
E.M.Gesner,
S.A.Raithatha,
D.T.Stuart,
and
A.M.Macmillan
(2008).
Structural elucidation of a PRP8 core domain from the heart of the spliceosome.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
15,
1199-1205.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Abelson
(2008).
Is the spliceosome a ribonucleoprotein enzyme?
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
15,
1235-1237.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Pena,
A.Rozov,
P.Fabrizio,
R.Lührmann,
and
M.C.Wahl
(2008).
Structure and function of an RNase H domain at the heart of the spliceosome.
|
| |
EMBO J,
27,
2929-2940.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |