 |
PDBsum entry 3d11
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
E.C.3.2.1.18
- exo-alpha-sialidase.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
Hydrolysis of alpha-(2->3)-, alpha-(2->6)-, alpha-(2->8)-glycosidic linkages of terminal sialic residues in oligosaccharides, glycoproteins, glycolipids, colominic acid and synthetic substrates.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
105:9953-9958
(2008)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Host cell recognition by the henipaviruses: crystal structures of the Nipah G attachment glycoprotein and its complex with ephrin-B3.
|
|
K.Xu,
K.R.Rajashankar,
Y.P.Chan,
J.P.Himanen,
C.C.Broder,
D.B.Nikolov.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Nipah virus (NiV) and Hendra virus are the type species of the highly pathogenic
paramyxovirus genus Henipavirus, which can cause severe respiratory disease and
fatal encephalitis infections in humans, with case fatality rates approaching
75%. NiV contains two envelope glycoproteins, the receptor-binding G
glycoprotein (NiV-G) that facilitates attachment to host cells and the fusion
(F) glycoprotein that mediates membrane merger. The henipavirus G glycoproteins
lack both hemagglutinating and neuraminidase activities and, instead, engage the
highly conserved ephrin-B2 and ephrin-B3 cell surface proteins as their entry
receptors. Here, we report the crystal structures of the NiV-G both in its
receptor-unbound state and in complex with ephrin-B3, providing, to our
knowledge, the first view of a paramyxovirus attachment complex in which a
cellular protein is used as the virus receptor. Complex formation generates an
extensive protein-protein interface around a protruding ephrin loop, which is
inserted in the central cavity of the NiV-G beta-propeller. Analysis of the
structural data reveals the molecular basis for the highly specific interactions
of the henipavirus G glycoproteins with only two members (ephrin-B2 and
ephrin-B3) of the very large ephrin family and suggests how they mediate in a
unique fashion both cell attachment and the initiation of membrane fusion during
the virus infection processes. The structures further suggest that the
NiV-G/ephrin interactions can be effectively targeted to disrupt viral entry and
provide the foundation for structure-based antiviral drug design.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Crystal structure of the NiV-G/ephrin-B3 complex. (A) Side
view of the NiV-G/ephrin-B3 complex. The β-strands of NiV-G are
colored in magenta, and the α-helices are in cyan. The
β-strands of ephrin-B3 are colored in yellow and the α-helices
are in red. The carbohydrate moieties, shown as stick models, do
not interact with ephrin-B3 but extend in the solvent. The N and
C termini of the molecules are labeled. (B) The molecular
surfaces of the henipavirus (cyan) and the parainfluenza virus
(magenta) attachment proteins along the top (or
receptor-binding) face of the molecules. The lower images are
close-up views of the receptor-binding pockets with the bound
receptor (ephrin-B3 G–H loop in yellow, sialic acid in green).
Only the G–H loop of ephrin-B3 is shown. In red are shown the
NiV-G residues that interact with ephrin-B3 residues outside of
the G–H loop, highlighting the polar region of the
NiV-G/ephrin interface.
|
 |
Figure 5.
Structure of the NiV-G/ephrin interface. Interacting residues
are labeled. (A) Salt bridges at the polar (peripheral) region
of the NiV-G/ephrin interface. NiV-G is in yellow and ephrin-B3
in gray. (B) The G–H ephrin-B3 loop bound to the NiV-G surface
channel. (C) The same surface in the unbound NiV-G molecule. The
position of the G–H ephrin-B3 loop is still shown to
illustrate that the binding pockets for ephrin residues P122,
L124, and W125 are already fully formed in the unbound
attachment protein and undergo little or no conformational
rearrangements upon ephrin binding. On the other hand, the Y120
binding pocket is only formed upon ephrin binding.
|
 |
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
T.Hashiguchi,
T.Ose,
M.Kubota,
N.Maita,
J.Kamishikiryo,
K.Maenaka,
and
Y.Yanagi
(2011).
Structure of the measles virus hemagglutinin bound to its cellular receptor SLAM.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
18,
135-141.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Santiago,
M.L.Celma,
T.Stehle,
and
J.M.Casasnovas
(2010).
Structure of the measles virus hemagglutinin bound to the CD46 receptor.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
17,
124-129.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Khetawat,
and
C.C.Broder
(2010).
A functional henipavirus envelope glycoprotein pseudotyped lentivirus assay system.
|
| |
Virol J,
7,
312.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.C.Aguilar,
V.Aspericueta,
L.R.Robinson,
K.E.Aanensen,
and
B.Lee
(2010).
A quantitative and kinetic fusion protein-triggering assay can discern distinct steps in the nipah virus membrane fusion cascade.
|
| |
J Virol,
84,
8033-8041.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.E.Dutch
(2010).
Entry and fusion of emerging paramyxoviruses.
|
| |
PLoS Pathog,
6,
e1000881.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.A.Bowden,
M.Crispin,
D.J.Harvey,
E.Y.Jones,
and
D.I.Stuart
(2010).
Dimeric architecture of the Hendra virus attachment glycoprotein: evidence for a conserved mode of assembly.
|
| |
J Virol,
84,
6208-6217.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
E.C.Smith,
A.Popa,
A.Chang,
C.Masante,
and
R.E.Dutch
(2009).
Viral entry mechanisms: the increasing diversity of paramyxovirus entry.
|
| |
FEBS J,
276,
7217-7227.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.C.Aguilar,
Z.A.Ataman,
V.Aspericueta,
A.Q.Fang,
M.Stroud,
O.A.Negrete,
R.A.Kammerer,
and
B.Lee
(2009).
A novel receptor-induced activation site in the Nipah virus attachment glycoprotein (G) involved in triggering the fusion glycoprotein (F).
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
1628-1635.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.P.Himanen,
Y.Goldgur,
H.Miao,
E.Myshkin,
H.Guo,
M.Buck,
M.Nguyen,
K.R.Rajashankar,
B.Wang,
and
D.B.Nikolov
(2009).
Ligand recognition by A-class Eph receptors: crystal structures of the EphA2 ligand-binding domain and the EphA2/ephrin-A1 complex.
|
| |
EMBO Rep,
10,
722-728.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
K.N.Bossart,
Z.Zhu,
D.Middleton,
J.Klippel,
G.Crameri,
J.Bingham,
J.A.McEachern,
D.Green,
T.J.Hancock,
Y.P.Chan,
A.C.Hickey,
D.S.Dimitrov,
L.F.Wang,
and
C.C.Broder
(2009).
A neutralizing human monoclonal antibody protects against lethal disease in a new ferret model of acute nipah virus infection.
|
| |
PLoS Pathog,
5,
e1000642.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Wu,
W.Li,
G.Peng,
and
F.Li
(2009).
Crystal structure of NL63 respiratory coronavirus receptor-binding domain complexed with its human receptor.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
106,
19970-19974.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Prabakaran,
Z.Zhu,
X.Xiao,
A.Biragyn,
A.S.Dimitrov,
C.C.Broder,
and
D.S.Dimitrov
(2009).
Potent human monoclonal antibodies against SARS CoV, Nipah and Hendra viruses.
|
| |
Expert Opin Biol Ther,
9,
355-368.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.M.Iorio,
V.R.Melanson,
and
P.J.Mahon
(2009).
Glycoprotein interactions in paramyxovirus fusion.
|
| |
Future Virol,
4,
335-351.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.A.Connolly,
G.P.Leser,
T.S.Jardetzky,
and
R.A.Lamb
(2009).
Bimolecular complementation of paramyxovirus fusion and hemagglutinin-neuraminidase proteins enhances fusion: implications for the mechanism of fusion triggering.
|
| |
J Virol,
83,
10857-10868.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Paal,
M.A.Brindley,
C.St Clair,
A.Prussia,
D.Gaus,
S.A.Krumm,
J.P.Snyder,
and
R.K.Plemper
(2009).
Probing the spatial organization of measles virus fusion complexes.
|
| |
J Virol,
83,
10480-10493.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Stehle,
and
J.M.Casasnovas
(2009).
Specificity switching in virus-receptor complexes.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
19,
181-188.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Goldgur,
S.Paavilainen,
D.Nikolov,
and
J.P.Himanen
(2009).
Structure of the ligand-binding domain of the EphB2 receptor at 2 A resolution.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun,
65,
71-74.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
K.A.Bishop,
A.C.Hickey,
D.Khetawat,
J.R.Patch,
K.N.Bossart,
Z.Zhu,
L.F.Wang,
D.S.Dimitrov,
and
C.C.Broder
(2008).
Residues in the stalk domain of the hendra virus g glycoprotein modulate conformational changes associated with receptor binding.
|
| |
J Virol,
82,
11398-11409.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |