 |
PDBsum entry 3bip
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
3bip
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Transcription
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Crystal structure of yeast spt16 n-terminal domain
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Fact complex subunit spt16. Chain: a, b. Fragment: residues 1-465. Synonym: facilitates chromatin transcription complex subunit spt16, suppressor of ty protein 16, cell division control protein 68. Engineered: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Baker's yeast. Organism_taxid: 4932. Gene: spt16, cdc68, ssf1. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562.
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
1.94Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.180
|
R-free:
|
0.244
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
A.P.Vandemark,H.Xin,L.Mccullough,R.Rawlins,S.Bentley,A.Heroux, S.J.David,C.P.Hill,T.Formosa
|
Key ref:
|
 |
A.P.VanDemark
et al.
(2008).
Structural and functional analysis of the Spt16p N-terminal domain reveals overlapping roles of yFACT subunits.
J Biol Chem,
283,
5058-5068.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
30-Nov-07
|
Release date:
|
18-Dec-07
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P32558
(SPT16_YEAST) -
FACT complex subunit SPT16 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain ATCC 204508 / S288c)
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
1035 a.a.
444 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
 |
CATH domain |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Biol Chem
283:5058-5068
(2008)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structural and functional analysis of the Spt16p N-terminal domain reveals overlapping roles of yFACT subunits.
|
|
A.P.VanDemark,
H.Xin,
L.McCullough,
R.Rawlins,
S.Bentley,
A.Heroux,
D.J.Stillman,
C.P.Hill,
T.Formosa.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
yFACT (heterodimers of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Spt16-Pob3 combined with Nhp6)
binds to and alters the properties of nucleosomes. The essential function of
yFACT is not disrupted by deletion of the N-terminal domain (NTD) of Spt16 or by
mutation of the middle domain of Pob3, but either alteration makes yeast cells
sensitive to DNA replication stress. We have determined the structure of the
Spt16 NTD and find evidence for a conserved potential peptide-binding site.
Pob3-M also contains a putative binding site, and we show that these two sites
perform an overlapping essential function. We find that yFACT can bind the
N-terminal tails of some histones and that this interaction is important for
yFACT-nucleosome binding. However, neither the Spt16 NTD nor a key residue in
the putative Pob3-M-binding site was required for interactions with histone N
termini or for yFACT-mediated nucleosome reorganization in vitro. Instead, both
potential binding sites interact functionally with the C-terminal docking domain
of the histone H2A. yFACT therefore appears to make multiple contacts with
different sites within nucleosomes, and these interactions are partially
redundant with one another. The docking domain of H2A is identified as an
important participant in maintaining stability during yFACT-mediated nucleosome
reorganization, suggesting new models for the mechanism of this activity.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
FIGURE 1. Structure of the Spt16 NTD. Top, the residues in
each structural domain of Spt16-Pob3 are indicated (16, 23). 31
Spt16 homologs chosen to include the full spectrum of eukaryotes
were aligned and found to be about 40% identical to the yeast
sequence overall. The percent identity to the S. cerevisiae
sequence varied for each domain as indicated. All homologs
included the NTD. The C-terminal domain is broken into two
regions for this calculation, a less conserved but 50% acidic
region (960-1008) and a more highly conserved and neutral region
(1009-1029). D indicates the dimerization interface. Middle,
ribbon diagrams of the Spt16 NTD structure. The N-terminal lobe
is shown in turquoise; the C-terminal lobe containing the
putative binding cleft in blue, and the loop that encloses the
cleft in orange. Labels indicate the secondary structure
features. Bottom, secondary structures within the Spt16 NTD are
aligned with the sequence. Residues that are conserved among
over 70% of the 31 Spt16 homologs compared are highlighted in
red. Bars below the text indicate regions targeted for
site-directed mutagenesis, coded according to the severity of
the synthetic defect with pob3-Q308K (Table 2).
|
 |
Figure 5.
FIGURE 5. Conservation correlates with the strength of
synthetic defects with pob3-Q308K. Top, residues that are
identical among at least 70% of the 31 Spt16 homologs aligned
(see Fig. 1) are indicated in red, revealing clustering near the
canonical binding/active site cleft for prolidase, methionine
aminopeptidase, aminopeptidase P, and creatinase (asterisk). The
full surface is shown on the left, and the loop residues 266-274
are removed in the middle panel to reveal the enclosed tunnel
region. The right panel shows a view rotated 180° about the
vertical axis. Bottom, severity of the synthetic defect when
combined with pob3-Q308K is indicated (Table 2); severe defects
are shown in red, moderate defects in orange, and mild defects
in yellow. If residues were tested individually and in multiple
mutations, only the score from the single mutation is used here.
Otherwise, the score for the complex mutation is assigned to all
residues altered. WT sequences are indicated along with the
number of the first residue. The orientations are the same as in
the top panels.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the ASBMB:
J Biol Chem
(2008,
283,
5058-5068)
copyright 2008.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
C.Das,
J.K.Tyler,
and
M.E.Churchill
(2010).
The histone shuffle: histone chaperones in an energetic dance.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci,
35,
476-489.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.C.Hansen,
J.K.Nyborg,
K.Luger,
and
L.A.Stargell
(2010).
Histone chaperones, histone acetylation, and the fluidity of the chromogenome.
|
| |
J Cell Physiol,
224,
289-299.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Morillo-Huesca,
D.Maya,
M.C.Muñoz-Centeno,
R.K.Singh,
V.Oreal,
G.U.Reddy,
D.Liang,
V.Géli,
A.Gunjan,
and
S.Chávez
(2010).
FACT prevents the accumulation of free histones evicted from transcribed chromatin and a subsequent cell cycle delay in G1.
|
| |
PLoS Genet,
6,
e1000964.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Ransom,
B.K.Dennehey,
and
J.K.Tyler
(2010).
Chaperoning histones during DNA replication and repair.
|
| |
Cell,
140,
183-195.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.L.Rich,
and
D.G.Myszka
(2010).
Grading the commercial optical biosensor literature-Class of 2008: 'The Mighty Binders'.
|
| |
J Mol Recognit,
23,
1.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Xin,
S.Takahata,
M.Blanksma,
L.McCullough,
D.J.Stillman,
and
T.Formosa
(2009).
yFACT induces global accessibility of nucleosomal DNA without H2A-H2B displacement.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
35,
365-376.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Sakamoto,
S.Noguchi,
S.Kawashima,
Y.Okada,
T.Enomoto,
M.Seki,
and
M.Horikoshi
(2009).
Global analysis of mutual interaction surfaces of nucleosomes with comprehensive point mutants.
|
| |
Genes Cells,
14,
1271-1330.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Takahata,
Y.Yu,
and
D.J.Stillman
(2009).
The E2F functional analogue SBF recruits the Rpd3(L) HDAC, via Whi5 and Stb1, and the FACT chromatin reorganizer, to yeast G1 cyclin promoters.
|
| |
EMBO J,
28,
3378-3389.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.B.Fleming,
C.F.Kao,
C.Hillyer,
M.Pikaart,
and
M.A.Osley
(2008).
H2B ubiquitylation plays a role in nucleosome dynamics during transcription elongation.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
31,
57-66.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Formosa
(2008).
FACT and the reorganized nucleosome.
|
| |
Mol Biosyst,
4,
1085-1093.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Stuwe,
M.Hothorn,
E.Lejeune,
V.Rybin,
M.Bortfeld,
K.Scheffzek,
and
A.G.Ladurner
(2008).
The FACT Spt16 "peptidase" domain is a histone H3-H4 binding module.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
105,
8884-8889.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |