|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(+ 1 more)
227 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(+ 1 more)
203 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(+ 1 more)
219 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Hydrolase/hydrolase activator
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Crystal structure of archaeal 20s proteasome in complex with thE C- terminus of pan
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Proteasome subunit alpha. Chain: a, b, c, d, e, f, g. Synonym: 20s proteasome alpha subunit,proteasome core protein psma. Engineered: yes. Proteasome subunit beta. Chain: h, i, j, k, l, m, n. Synonym: 20s proteasome beta subunit,proteasome core protein psmb. Engineered: yes. Proteasome activator pa26, proteasome-activating
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Thermoplasma acidophilum. Organism_taxid: 2303. Gene: psma, ta1288. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 469008. Gene: psmb, ta0612. Trypanosoma brucei brucei, methanocaldococcus jannaschii. Organism_taxid: 5691, 2190.
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
4.00Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.249
|
R-free:
|
0.284
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
Y.Yu,Y.Cheng
|
|
Key ref:
|
 |
Y.Yu
et al.
(2010).
Interactions of PAN's C-termini with archaeal 20S proteasome and implications for the eukaryotic proteasome-ATPase interactions.
Embo J,
29,
692-702.
PubMed id:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
17-Aug-09
|
Release date:
|
29-Dec-09
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P25156
(PSA_THEAC) -
Proteasome subunit alpha from Thermoplasma acidophilum (strain ATCC 25905 / DSM 1728 / JCM 9062 / NBRC 15155 / AMRC-C165)
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
233 a.a.
227 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
P28061
(PSB_THEAC) -
Proteasome subunit beta from Thermoplasma acidophilum (strain ATCC 25905 / DSM 1728 / JCM 9062 / NBRC 15155 / AMRC-C165)
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
211 a.a.
203 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class 1:
|
 |
Chains A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N:
E.C.3.4.25.1
- proteasome endopeptidase complex.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
Cleavage at peptide bonds with very broad specificity.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class 2:
|
 |
Chains O, P, Q, R, S, T, U:
E.C.?
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Note, where more than one E.C. class is given (as above), each may
correspond to a different protein domain or, in the case of polyprotein
precursors, to a different mature protein.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Embo J
29:692-702
(2010)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Interactions of PAN's C-termini with archaeal 20S proteasome and implications for the eukaryotic proteasome-ATPase interactions.
|
|
Y.Yu,
D.M.Smith,
H.M.Kim,
V.Rodriguez,
A.L.Goldberg,
Y.Cheng.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Protein degradation in the 20S proteasome is regulated in eukaryotes by the 19S
ATPase complex and in archaea by the homologous PAN ATPase ring complex.
Subunits of these hexameric ATPases contain on their C-termini a conserved
hydrophobic-tyrosine-X (HbYX) motif that docks into pockets in the 20S to
stimulate the opening of a gated substrate entry channel. Here, we report the
crystal structure of the archaeal 20S proteasome in complex with the C-terminus
of the archaeal proteasome regulatory ATPase, PAN. This structure defines the
detailed interactions between the critical C-terminal HbYX motif and the 20S
alpha-subunits and indicates that the intersubunit pocket in the 20S undergoes
an induced-fit conformational change on binding of the HbYX motif. This
structure together with related mutagenesis data suggest how in eukaryotes
certain proteasomal ATPases bind to specific pockets in an asymmetrical manner
to regulate gate opening.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
J.Maupin-Furlow
(2012).
Proteasomes and protein conjugation across domains of life.
|
| |
Nat Rev Microbiol,
10,
100-111.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.M.Smith,
H.Fraga,
C.Reis,
G.Kafri,
and
A.L.Goldberg
(2011).
ATP binds to proteasomal ATPases in pairs with distinct functional effects, implying an ordered reaction cycle.
|
| |
Cell,
144,
526-538.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Tian,
S.Park,
M.J.Lee,
B.Huck,
F.McAllister,
C.P.Hill,
S.P.Gygi,
and
D.Finley
(2011).
An asymmetric interface between the regulatory and core particles of the proteasome.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
18,
1259-1267.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Striebel,
M.Hunkeler,
H.Summer,
and
E.Weber-Ban
(2010).
The mycobacterial Mpa-proteasome unfolds and degrades pupylated substrates by engaging Pup's N-terminus.
|
| |
EMBO J,
29,
1262-1271.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Gallastegui,
and
M.Groll
(2010).
The 26S proteasome: assembly and function of a destructive machine.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci,
35,
634-642.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Bohn,
F.Beck,
E.Sakata,
T.Walzthoeni,
M.Beck,
R.Aebersold,
F.Förster,
W.Baumeister,
and
S.Nickell
(2010).
Structure of the 26S proteasome from Schizosaccharomyces pombe at subnanometer resolution.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
20992-20997.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.L.Religa,
R.Sprangers,
and
L.E.Kay
(2010).
Dynamic regulation of archaeal proteasome gate opening as studied by TROSY NMR.
|
| |
Science,
328,
98.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
| |