|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Signaling protein
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Crystal structure of the carboxy terminus of homer1
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Homer protein homolog 1. Chain: a, b, c, d. Fragment: coiled-coil region, unp residues 302-366. Synonym: psd-zip45, vasp/ena-related gene up-regulated during seizure and ltp. Engineered: yes. Mutation: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Rattus norvegicus. Rat. Organism_taxid: 10116. Gene: homer1, homer, vesl. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562.
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
1.75Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.220
|
R-free:
|
0.289
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
M.K.Hayashi,M.H.Stearns,V.Giannini,R.-M.Xu,C.Sala,Y.Hayashi
|
Key ref:
|
 |
M.K.Hayashi
et al.
(2009).
The postsynaptic density proteins Homer and Shank form a polymeric network structure.
Cell,
137,
159-171.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
18-Apr-08
|
Release date:
|
31-Mar-09
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Cell
137:159-171
(2009)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
The postsynaptic density proteins Homer and Shank form a polymeric network structure.
|
|
M.K.Hayashi,
C.Tang,
C.Verpelli,
R.Narayanan,
M.H.Stearns,
R.M.Xu,
H.Li,
C.Sala,
Y.Hayashi.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The postsynaptic density (PSD) is crucial for synaptic functions, but the
molecular architecture retaining its structure and components remains elusive.
Homer and Shank are among the most abundant scaffolding proteins in the PSD,
working synergistically for maturation of dendritic spines. Here, we demonstrate
that Homer and Shank, together, form a mesh-like matrix structure.
Crystallographic analysis of this region revealed a pair of parallel dimeric
coiled coils intercalated in a tail-to-tail fashion to form a tetramer, giving
rise to the unique configuration of a pair of N-terminal EVH1 domains at each
end of the coiled coil. In neurons, the tetramerization is required for
structural integrity of the dendritic spines and recruitment of proteins to
synapses. We propose that the Homer-Shank complex serves as a structural
framework and as an assembly platform for other PSD proteins.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Crystal Structure of the Homer Coiled-Coil Region
(A) Ribbon representation of the crystal structure of the
C-terminal half of Homer1b coiled-coil region CC2. The four
strands are marked A–D. (B) A model of the whole
structure of long form of Homer. The model is constructed from
the structure of the Homer1CC2 domain (blue), EVH1 domain (red)
(Irie et al., 2002), and coiled-coil probability prediction and
protease degradation sites (Hayashi et al., 2006). The CC1 and a
part of the CC2 domain, whose atomic structures are not known,
are in light green and light blue, respectively. Regions likely
to be disordered are shown in gray. (C) Primary sequence of
the crystallized fragment. 1B, rat Homer1b; 3A, human Homer3a.
Orange, aliphatic residues (I, L, V); blue, acidic (D, E);
green, basic (K, R); gray, residues not in crystals. Mutations
made in dimeric Homer1b I332R/I337E are shown below.
“abcdefg” denotes positions in the heptad of coiled coil.
(D) Distance between the A and the B strand or between the
C and the D strand are measured and plotted against the number
of residues. (E) Helical wheel representation of the
dimeric (top) and tetrameric (bottom) region of Homer1b.
Residues start from K290 at g position. Residues that make
knobs-into-holes interactions with residues on the other strands
are shown in blue. Residues changed in the dimeric mutant (I332
and I337) are shown in red. Residues outside the dotted circles
are located within the wide dimeric region. (F) Example of
intermolecular salt bridges formed between residues at the e
(E295 and E302) and g (K290 and R297) positions within the
dimeric region. (G) Large amino acids occupying the a and d
positions in the wide dimeric region, Q319 and F322. (H)
Interchain interactions in the tetrameric region. Residues at d
positions (L329, K336, L343, L350) form the A-D and B-C
interface, and those at e positions (L330, I337, R344, L351)
form the A-C and B-D interface. (I) Hydrophobic core formed
by leucines at a positions (L326, L333, L340, L347).
|
 |
Figure 7.
Figure 7. The Model of Interaction between Homer and Shank
(A) A model of high-order complex between Homer and Shank.
Currently, the oligomeric status of Shank is not known. (B)
Overlay of the structural model of Homer (blue) on the PSD. The
structure of mGluR1 (yellow) is modeled based on the structure
of mGluR1 extracellular ligand binding domain (Kunishima et al.,
2000) and the structure of rhodopsin (Palczewski et al., 2000).
The structures of IP3R (red) (Sato et al., 2004), TRPC (green)
(Mio et al., 2007), and dynamin (Mears et al., 2007) are taken
from electron microscopy images. All structures are depicted to
scale on an electron microscope image of a hippocampal CA1 spine
with smooth endoplasmic reticulum, obtained and modified from
Spacek and Harris (1997). Copyright 1997 by the Society for
Neuroscience. The presynaptic terminal (Pre), postsynaptic
terminal (Post), and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) are indicated.
Scale bar, 0.1 μm.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Cell
(2009,
137,
159-171)
copyright 2009.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
H.Won,
H.R.Lee,
H.Y.Gee,
W.Mah,
J.I.Kim,
J.Lee,
S.Ha,
C.Chung,
E.S.Jung,
Y.S.Cho,
S.G.Park,
J.S.Lee,
K.Lee,
D.Kim,
Y.C.Bae,
B.K.Kaang,
M.G.Lee,
and
E.Kim
(2012).
Autistic-like social behaviour in Shank2-mutant mice improved by restoring NMDA receptor function.
|
| |
Nature,
486,
261-265.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.M.Grabrucker,
M.J.Knight,
C.Proepper,
J.Bockmann,
M.Joubert,
M.Rowan,
G.U.Nienhaus,
C.C.Garner,
J.U.Bowie,
M.R.Kreutz,
E.D.Gundelfinger,
and
T.M.Boeckers
(2011).
Concerted action of zinc and ProSAP/Shank in synaptogenesis and synapse maturation.
|
| |
EMBO J,
30,
569-581.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Dani,
B.Huang,
J.Bergan,
C.Dulac,
and
X.Zhuang
(2010).
Superresolution imaging of chemical synapses in the brain.
|
| |
Neuron,
68,
843-856.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Charrier,
P.Machado,
R.Y.Tweedie-Cullen,
D.Rutishauser,
I.M.Mansuy,
and
A.Triller
(2010).
A crosstalk between β1 and β3 integrins controls glycine receptor and gephyrin trafficking at synapses.
|
| |
Nat Neurosci,
13,
1388-1395.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Kaufman,
M.Ayub,
and
J.B.Vincent
(2010).
The genetic basis of non-syndromic intellectual disability: a review.
|
| |
J Neurodev Disord,
2,
182-209.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Berkel,
C.R.Marshall,
B.Weiss,
J.Howe,
R.Roeth,
U.Moog,
V.Endris,
W.Roberts,
P.Szatmari,
D.Pinto,
M.Bonin,
A.Riess,
H.Engels,
R.Sprengel,
S.W.Scherer,
and
G.A.Rappold
(2010).
Mutations in the SHANK2 synaptic scaffolding gene in autism spectrum disorder and mental retardation.
|
| |
Nat Genet,
42,
489-491.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Saneyoshi,
D.A.Fortin,
and
T.R.Soderling
(2010).
Regulation of spine and synapse formation by activity-dependent intracellular signaling pathways.
|
| |
Curr Opin Neurobiol,
20,
108-115.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.S.Iskenderian-Epps,
and
B.Imperiali
(2010).
Modulation of Shank3 PDZ domain ligand-binding affinity by dimerization.
|
| |
Chembiochem,
11,
1979-1984.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Charlebois
(2009).
Journal club. A biophysicist ponders the application of hidden metric spaces to genetic networks.
|
| |
Nature,
458,
811.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Roselli,
P.Hutzler,
Y.Wegerich,
P.Livrea,
and
O.F.Almeida
(2009).
Disassembly of shank and homer synaptic clusters is driven by soluble beta-amyloid(1-40) through divergent NMDAR-dependent signalling pathways.
|
| |
PLoS One,
4,
e6011.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.L.Ritter,
and
R.A.Hall
(2009).
Fine-tuning of GPCR activity by receptor-interacting proteins.
|
| |
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,
10,
819-830.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
|
');
}
}
 |