 |
PDBsum entry 3cip
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structural protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
3cip
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
105:11748-11753
(2008)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Modulation of actin structure and function by phosphorylation of Tyr-53 and profilin binding.
|
|
K.Baek,
X.Liu,
F.Ferron,
S.Shu,
E.D.Korn,
R.Dominguez.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
On starvation, Dictyostelium cells aggregate to form multicellular fruiting
bodies containing spores that germinate when transferred to nutrient-rich
medium. This developmental cycle correlates with the extent of actin
phosphorylation at Tyr-53 (pY53-actin), which is low in vegetative cells but
high in viable mature spores. Here we describe high-resolution crystal
structures of pY53-actin and unphosphorylated actin in complexes with gelsolin
segment 1 and profilin. In the structure of pY53-actin, the phosphate group on
Tyr-53 makes hydrogen-bonding interactions with residues of the DNase I-binding
loop (D-loop) of actin, resulting in a more stable conformation of the D-loop
than in the unphosphorylated structures. A more rigidly folded D-loop may
explain some of the previously described properties of pY53-actin, including its
increased critical concentration for polymerization, reduced rates of nucleation
and pointed end elongation, and weak affinity for DNase I. We show here that
phosphorylation of Tyr-53 inhibits subtilisin cleavage of the D-loop and reduces
the rate of nucleotide exchange on actin. The structure of
profilin-Dictyostelium-actin is strikingly similar to previously determined
structures of profilin-beta-actin and profilin-alpha-actin. By comparing this
representative set of profilin-actin structures with other structures of actin,
we highlight the effects of profilin on the actin conformation. In the
profilin-actin complexes, subdomains 1 and 3 of actin close around profilin,
producing a 4.7 degrees rotation of the two major domains of actin relative to
each other. As a result, the nucleotide cleft becomes moderately more open in
the profilin-actin complex, probably explaining the stimulation of nucleotide
exchange on actin by profilin.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Conformational change in actin subdomain 2 on phosphorylation
of Tyr-53. (A and B) Close views of subdomain 2 in the
structures of unphosphorylated actin and pY53-actin, showing
omit electron density maps (contoured at 1 σ) around Tyr-53
(see Figs. S3 and S5 for a full view of the G1-actin structure).
The D-loop was not visualized in the unphosphorylated structure.
Hydrogen-bonding contacts (red dashed lines) between the oxygen
atoms of the phosphate group on Tyr-53 and residues of the
D-loop stabilize the conformation of the D-loop in the structure
of pY53-actin. This and other figures of the paper were
generated with the program PyMOL
(http://pymol.sourceforge.net/). (C) Phosphorylation protects
the D-loop from subtilisin cleavage, as shown by the ≈50%
decrease in the initial rate of digestion. (D and E) Based on
the increase in fluorescence as etheno-ATP replaces actin-bound
ATP, phosphorylation reduces the rate of nucleotide exchange
from 0.011 s^−1 for unphosphorylated actin to 0.006 s^−1 for
pY53-actin, but profilin accelerates and gelsolin inhibits
nucleotide exchange to the same extents for both forms of actin.
The increase in fluorescence at equilibrium for pY53-actin is
only 50% of the increase for unphosphorylated actin. Data were
recorded every 10 s.
|
 |
Figure 2.
Profilin binding causes a moderate opening of the nucleotide
cleft in actin. (A) Superimposition of the structures of
profilin–Dictyostelium-actin (blue and cyan) and uncomplexed
monomeric actin (28) (blue and magenta). Two orientations are
shown, rotated by 90°. The latter structure was obtained by
mutagenesis in subdomain 4 and is thought to be free of
perturbations resulting from the binding of an ABP or chemical
cross-linking. For clarity, profilin is not shown in this figure
(see Figs. S5 and S6 for a full view of the profilin–actin
structure). Subdomains 3 and 4 of the structures were
superimposed (blue) to highlight the relative movement of
subdomains 1 and 2 (magenta or cyan). Using the classical view
of actin as a reference (left view), the 4.7° rotation
(calculated with the program DynDom,
http://www.sys.uea.ac.uk/dyndom/) between the two major domains
of actin can be visualized as two perpendicular rotations of
≈3.3°. The center of this rotation approximately coincides
with the junctions between domains, consisting of residue
Lys-336 and the helix between residues Ile-136 and Gly-146.
Comparison of the profilin–actin structures with any other
structure of actin, except for the wide-open structure of
profilin–β-actin (36), results in a similar motion of the two
major domains (see also Movies S2 and S3). This movement appears
less dramatic than previously anticipated (36, 37), but it is
probably sufficient to explain the stimulation of nucleotide
exchange by profilin. (B) Quenching of tryptophan fluorescence
on profilin binding (the results of two identical experiments,
with different preparations of both actins, are shown). Profilin
binds pY53-actin and unphosphorylated actin with similar
affinities (K[d] = 0.090 and 0.057 μM, respectively), but the
quenching of tryptophan fluorescence is significantly less for
profilin–pY53-actin.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
G.Hild,
B.Bugyi,
and
M.Nyitrai
(2010).
Conformational dynamics of actin: effectors and implications for biological function.
|
| |
Cytoskeleton (Hoboken),
67,
609-629.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Murakami,
T.Yasunaga,
T.Q.Noguchi,
Y.Gomibuchi,
K.X.Ngo,
T.Q.Uyeda,
and
T.Wakabayashi
(2010).
Structural basis for actin assembly, activation of ATP hydrolysis, and delayed phosphate release.
|
| |
Cell,
143,
275-287.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
X.Liu,
S.Shu,
M.S.Hong,
B.Yu,
and
E.D.Korn
(2010).
Mutation of actin Tyr-53 alters the conformations of the DNase I-binding loop and the nucleotide-binding cleft.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
285,
9729-9739.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Kardos,
K.Pozsonyi,
E.Nevalainen,
P.Lappalainen,
M.Nyitrai,
and
G.Hild
(2009).
The effects of ADF/cofilin and profilin on the conformation of the ATP-binding cleft of monomeric actin.
|
| |
Biophys J,
96,
2335-2343.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Staubach,
H.Razawi,
and
F.G.Hanisch
(2009).
Proteomics of MUC1-containing lipid rafts from plasma membranes and exosomes of human breast carcinoma cells MCF-7.
|
| |
Proteomics,
9,
2820-2835.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |
|