|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Cancer Cell
13:365-373
(2008)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Matuzumab binding to EGFR prevents the conformational rearrangement required for dimerization.
|
|
J.Schmiedel,
A.Blaukat,
S.Li,
T.Knöchel,
K.M.Ferguson.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
An increasing number of therapeutic antibodies targeting tumors that express the
epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are in clinical use or late stages of
clinical development. Here we investigate the molecular basis for inhibition of
EGFR activation by the therapeutic antibody matuzumab (EMD72000). We describe
the X-ray crystal structure of the Fab fragment of matuzumab (Fab72000) in
complex with isolated domain III from the extracellular region of EGFR. Fab72000
interacts with an epitope on EGFR that is distinct from the ligand-binding
region on domain III and from the cetuximab/Erbitux epitope. Matuzumab blocks
ligand-induced receptor activation indirectly by sterically preventing the
domain rearrangement and local conformational changes that must occur for
high-affinity ligand binding and receptor dimerization.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 5.
Figure 5. Implications for the Mechanism of Inhibition of
EGFR by Matuzumab (A) Cartoon of the extended sEGFR with
Fab72000, in surface representation, docked onto its domain III
epitope. The orientation of the receptor is the same as for the
right-hand protomer in the sEGFR dimer shown in Figure 1 (with
domains colored as for the left-hand protomer; EGF is omitted
for clarity). The Fab72000 is colored as in Figure 3. The
N-terminal region of domain I clashes with the V[L] domain
(indicated with an arrow). Additional clashes occur along the
C-terminal half of domain II (see [B]). The C-terminal loop on
domain II (D278, H280) that makes critical contacts across the
dimer interface is marked with an asterisk. (B) In this
view, an approximate 50° rotation about the vertical axis
relative to (A), domain II is shown in sphere representation in
dark green. A cartoon of domain II of the other molecule in the
dimer is shown (light green) for reference. Domain I has been
omitted for clarity. The V[L] domain of the Fab clashes with
domain II in the critical C-terminal region that forms the
binding pocket for the dimerization arm and makes important
contacts with domain III (from N274 and E293 in domain II,
colored orange). These interactions are known to be crucial for
stabilizing the dimerization competent conformation of domain
II. The Fab72000 epitope loop on domain III is colored in red.
|
 |
Figure 7.
Figure 7. Matuzumab and Cetuximab Use Different Mechanisms to
Block Ligand-Induced EGFR Dimerization and Activation In
the center of the scheme, the ligand-induced sEGFR dimer is
represented, with domain I in red, domain II in green, domain
III in gray with red border, domain IV in gray with green
border, and the ligand (E) in violet. The colors for one
protomer are lightened for contrast. On the left-hand side a
scheme is shown to illustrate the mechanism of inhibition of
ligand-induced dimerization by matuzumab. Fab72000 binds to
domain III of sEGFR and sterically prevents the receptor from
adopting the conformation required for dimerization.
Importantly, Fab72000 blocks the local conformational changes in
domain II that are critical for both high-affinity ligand
binding and dimerization. The inhibition is noncompetitive; the
ligand-binding site on domain III is not blocked. This contrasts
with the mechanism of inhibition previously reported for
cetuximab (Li et al., 2005). FabC225 (right side) is a
competitive inhibitor that blocks the ligand-binding site on
domain III. This is the primary mechanism of inhibition of
ligand-mediated dimerization by cetuximab.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
from an Open Access publication published by Cell Press:
Cancer Cell
(2008,
13,
365-373)
copyright 2008.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
L.Hong,
S.Li,
Y.Han,
J.Du,
H.Zhang,
J.Li,
Q.Zhao,
K.Wu,
and
D.Fan
(2011).
Angiogenesis-related molecular targets in esophageal cancer.
|
| |
Expert Opin Investig Drugs,
20,
637-644.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Muda,
A.W.Gross,
J.P.Dawson,
C.He,
E.Kurosawa,
R.Schweickhardt,
M.Dugas,
M.Soloviev,
A.Bernhardt,
D.Fischer,
J.S.Wesolowski,
C.Kelton,
B.Neuteboom,
and
B.Hock
(2011).
Therapeutic assessment of SEED: a new engineered antibody platform designed to generate mono- and bispecific antibodies.
|
| |
Protein Eng Des Sel,
24,
447-454.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Hartmann,
N.Müller,
A.Blaukat,
J.Koch,
I.Benhar,
and
W.S.Wels
(2010).
Peptide mimotopes recognized by antibodies cetuximab and matuzumab induce a functionally equivalent anti-EGFR immune response.
|
| |
Oncogene,
29,
4517-4527.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
I.Vivanco,
and
I.K.Mellinghoff
(2010).
Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in oncology.
|
| |
Curr Opin Oncol,
22,
573-578.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.A.Tejani,
R.B.Cohen,
and
R.Mehra
(2010).
The contribution of cetuximab in the treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer.
|
| |
Biologics,
4,
173-185.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Hollmén,
and
K.Elenius
(2010).
Potential of ErbB4 antibodies for cancer therapy.
|
| |
Future Oncol,
6,
37-53.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Nagy,
J.Claus,
T.M.Jovin,
and
D.J.Arndt-Jovin
(2010).
Distribution of resting and ligand-bound ErbB1 and ErbB2 receptor tyrosine kinases in living cells using number and brightness analysis.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
16524-16529.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Diskin,
P.M.Marcovecchio,
and
P.J.Bjorkman
(2010).
Structure of a clade C HIV-1 gp120 bound to CD4 and CD4-induced antibody reveals anti-CD4 polyreactivity.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
17,
608-613.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
R.E.Gillilan,
M.J.Cook,
S.W.Cornaby,
and
D.H.Bilderback
(2010).
Microcrystallography using single-bounce monocapillary optics.
|
| |
J Synchrotron Radiat,
17,
227-236.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.L.Rich,
and
D.G.Myszka
(2010).
Grading the commercial optical biosensor literature-Class of 2008: 'The Mighty Binders'.
|
| |
J Mol Recognit,
23,
1.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.A.Katzel,
M.P.Fanucchi,
and
Z.Li
(2009).
Recent advances of novel targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer.
|
| |
J Hematol Oncol,
2,
2.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.R.Schmitz,
and
K.M.Ferguson
(2009).
Interaction of antibodies with ErbB receptor extracellular regions.
|
| |
Exp Cell Res,
315,
659-670.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Peipp,
M.Dechant,
and
T.Valerius
(2009).
Sensitivity and resistance to EGF-R inhibitors: approaches to enhance the efficacy of EGF-R antibodies.
|
| |
MAbs,
1,
590-599.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.W.Saif,
K.I.Syrigos,
S.Hotchkiss,
J.Shanley,
J.Grasso,
T.M.Ferencz,
K.Syrigos,
and
M.M.Shah
(2009).
Successful desensitization with cetuximab after an infusion reaction to panitumumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
|
| |
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol,
65,
107-112.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.A.Insel,
and
H.H.Patel
(2009).
Membrane rafts and caveolae in cardiovascular signaling.
|
| |
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens,
18,
50-56.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Jefferis
(2009).
Recombinant antibody therapeutics: the impact of glycosylation on mechanisms of action.
|
| |
Trends Pharmacol Sci,
30,
356-362.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.C.Lee,
A.López-Albaitero,
and
R.L.Ferris
(2009).
Immunotherapy of head and neck cancer using tumor antigen-specific monoclonal antibodies.
|
| |
Curr Oncol Rep,
11,
156-162.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Li,
H.Wang,
B.Peng,
M.Zhang,
D.Zhang,
S.Hou,
Y.Guo,
and
J.Ding
(2009).
Efalizumab binding to the LFA-1 alphaL I domain blocks ICAM-1 binding via steric hindrance.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
106,
4349-4354.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
T.P.Garrett,
A.W.Burgess,
H.K.Gan,
R.B.Luwor,
G.Cartwright,
F.Walker,
S.G.Orchard,
A.H.Clayton,
E.C.Nice,
J.Rothacker,
B.Catimel,
W.K.Cavenee,
L.J.Old,
E.Stockert,
G.Ritter,
T.E.Adams,
P.A.Hoyne,
D.Wittrup,
G.Chao,
J.R.Cochran,
C.Luo,
M.Lou,
T.Huyton,
Y.Xu,
W.D.Fairlie,
S.Yao,
A.M.Scott,
and
T.G.Johns
(2009).
Antibodies specifically targeting a locally misfolded region of tumor associated EGFR.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
106,
5082-5087.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Peipp,
M.Dechant,
and
T.Valerius
(2008).
Effector mechanisms of therapeutic antibodies against ErbB receptors.
|
| |
Curr Opin Immunol,
20,
436-443.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |