 |
PDBsum entry 2pkd
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signaling protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2pkd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Signaling protein
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Crystal structure of cd84: insite into slam family function
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Slam family member 5. Chain: a, b, c, d, e, f. Fragment: cd84. Synonym: signaling lymphocytic activation molecule 5, leukocyte differentiation antigen cd84, cd84 antigen, cell surface antigen max.3, hly9-beta. Engineered: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Homo sapiens. Human. Organism_taxid: 9606. Gene: cd84, slamf5. Expressed in: escherichia coli bl21(de3). Expression_system_taxid: 469008.
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
2.04Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.201
|
R-free:
|
0.277
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
Q.Yan,V.N.Malashkevich,A.Fedorov,E.Cao,J.W.Lary,J.L.Cole, S.G.Nathenson,S.C.Almo
|
Key ref:
|
 |
Q.Yan
et al.
(2007).
Structure of CD84 provides insight into SLAM family function.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
104,
10583-10588.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
17-Apr-07
|
Release date:
|
26-Jun-07
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q9UIB8
(SLAF5_HUMAN) -
SLAM family member 5 from Homo sapiens
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
345 a.a.
107 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
 |
CATH domain |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
104:10583-10588
(2007)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structure of CD84 provides insight into SLAM family function.
|
|
Q.Yan,
V.N.Malashkevich,
A.Fedorov,
E.Fedorov,
E.Cao,
J.W.Lary,
J.L.Cole,
S.G.Nathenson,
S.C.Almo.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The signaling lymphocyte activation molecule (SLAM) family includes homophilic
and heterophilic receptors that modulate both adaptive and innate immune
responses. These receptors share a common ectodomain organization: a
membrane-proximal immunoglobulin constant domain and a membrane-distal
immunoglobulin variable domain that is responsible for ligand recognition. CD84
is a homophilic family member that enhances IFN-gamma secretion in activated T
cells. Our solution studies revealed that CD84 strongly self-associates with a
K(d) in the submicromolar range. These data, in combination with previous
reports, demonstrate that the SLAM family homophilic affinities span at least
three orders of magnitude and suggest that differences in the affinities may
contribute to the distinct signaling behavior exhibited by the individual family
members. The 2.0 A crystal structure of the human CD84 immunoglobulin variable
domain revealed an orthogonal homophilic dimer with high similarity to the
recently reported homophilic dimer of the SLAM family member NTB-A. Structural
and chemical differences in the homophilic interfaces provide a mechanism to
prevent the formation of undesired heterodimers among the SLAM family homophilic
receptors. These structural data also suggest that, like NTB-A, all SLAM family
homophilic dimers adopt a highly kinked organization spanning an end-to-end
distance of approximately 140 A. This common molecular dimension provides an
opportunity for all two-domain SLAM family receptors to colocalize within the
immunological synapse and bridge the T cell and antigen-presenting cell.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Oligomeric state of CD84 and CD84-T99A mutation.
Overlay of the normalized g(s*) plots from DcDt+ analysis of the
sedimentation velocity data at different concentrations: CD84
IgV domain (A), CD84 IgVC domain (B), and CD84-T99A (C).
|
 |
Figure 4.
Fig. 4. Model of human CD84 involved in T cell activation.
The ribbon diagram representation of the model of the CD84
homophilic interaction, NTB-A homophilic interaction, and
CD2–CD58 heterophilic interaction between T cell and APC. The
MHC–TCR complex is also shown for a comparison of molecular
dimensions.
|
 |
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
J.L.Cannons,
S.G.Tangye,
and
P.L.Schwartzberg
(2011).
SLAM family receptors and SAP adaptors in immunity.
|
| |
Annu Rev Immunol,
29,
665-705.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Crotty
(2011).
Follicular helper CD4 T cells (TFH).
|
| |
Annu Rev Immunol,
29,
621-663.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Veillette
(2010).
SLAM-family receptors: immune regulators with or without SAP-family adaptors.
|
| |
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol,
2,
a002469.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Detre,
M.Keszei,
X.Romero,
G.C.Tsokos,
and
C.Terhorst
(2010).
SLAM family receptors and the SLAM-associated protein (SAP) modulate T cell functions.
|
| |
Semin Immunopathol,
32,
157-171.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Santiago,
M.L.Celma,
T.Stehle,
and
J.M.Casasnovas
(2010).
Structure of the measles virus hemagglutinin bound to the CD46 receptor.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
17,
124-129.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.L.Cannons,
H.Qi,
K.T.Lu,
M.Dutta,
J.Gomez-Rodriguez,
J.Cheng,
E.K.Wakeland,
R.N.Germain,
and
P.L.Schwartzberg
(2010).
Optimal germinal center responses require a multistage T cell:B cell adhesion process involving integrins, SLAM-associated protein, and CD84.
|
| |
Immunity,
32,
253-265.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Chattopadhyay,
E.Lazar-Molnar,
Q.Yan,
R.Rubinstein,
C.Zhan,
V.Vigdorovich,
U.A.Ramagopal,
J.Bonanno,
S.G.Nathenson,
and
S.C.Almo
(2009).
Sequence, structure, function, immunity: structural genomics of costimulation.
|
| |
Immunol Rev,
229,
356-386.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.L.Schwartzberg,
K.L.Mueller,
H.Qi,
and
J.L.Cannons
(2009).
SLAM receptors and SAP influence lymphocyte interactions, development and function.
|
| |
Nat Rev Immunol,
9,
39-46.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |