 |
PDBsum entry 2pij
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcription
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2pij
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
105:2343-2348
(2008)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Transitive homology-guided structural studies lead to discovery of Cro proteins with 40% sequence identity but different folds.
|
|
C.G.Roessler,
B.M.Hall,
W.J.Anderson,
W.M.Ingram,
S.A.Roberts,
W.R.Montfort,
M.H.Cordes.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Proteins that share common ancestry may differ in structure and function because
of divergent evolution of their amino acid sequences. For a typical diverse
protein superfamily, the properties of a few scattered members are known from
experiment. A satisfying picture of functional and structural evolution in
relation to sequence changes, however, may require characterization of a larger,
well chosen subset. Here, we employ a "stepping-stone" method, based on
transitive homology, to target sequences intermediate between two related
proteins with known divergent properties. We apply the approach to the question
of how new protein folds can evolve from preexisting folds and, in particular,
to an evolutionary change in secondary structure and oligomeric state in the Cro
family of bacteriophage transcription factors, initially identified by
sequence-structure comparison of distant homologs from phages P22 and lambda. We
report crystal structures of two Cro proteins, Xfaso 1 and Pfl 6, with sequences
intermediate between those of P22 and lambda. The domains show 40% sequence
identity but differ by switching of alpha-helix to beta-sheet in a C-terminal
region spanning approximately 25 residues. Sedimentation analysis also suggests
a correlation between helix-to-sheet conversion and strengthened dimerization.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Comparison of Xfaso 1 and Pfl 6. (A and B) Crystal structures
of Xfaso 1 (A) and Pfl 6 (B) with ribbon diagrams for the
biological dimers shown. The Xfaso 1 asymmetric unit has a third
subunit (data not shown). Cys 42 and Cys 55 are indicated for
one subunit of Xfaso 1 to show spatial proximity in the reduced
form. (C) One possible sequence alignment of Xfaso 1 and Pfl 6,
annotated with secondary structures. This alignment gives 40%
sequence identity across 65 residues, with two gaps. The
unstructured C termini of Xfaso 1 (16 residues) and Pfl 6 (7
residues) are not included in the alignment.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Summary of stepping-stone results and working model for Cro
structural evolution. Hypothetical or qualitative aspects are
gray. For example, structures of the common ancestor and Afe01
are known only at the level of general fold either from previous
outgroup analysis (ancestor) or from low-resolution data in the
present study (Afe01). One possible phylogenetic tree topology
is indicated by dashed gray lines. The different colors of the
second subunits shown for Pfl 6 Cro (gold) and λ Cro (red) are
intended to indicate the stronger dimerization of the latter.
(Insets) Residues in the ball-and-socket region of Pfl 6 Cro and
λ Cro.
|
 |
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
G.Bouvignies,
P.Vallurupalli,
M.H.Cordes,
D.F.Hansen,
and
L.E.Kay
(2011).
Measuring (1)H (N) temperature coefficients in invisible protein states by relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR,
50,
13-18.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.M.Stratton,
and
S.N.Loh
(2011).
Converting a protein into a switch for biosensing and functional regulation.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
20,
19-29.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Andreeva,
and
A.G.Murzin
(2010).
Structural classification of proteins and structural genomics: new insights into protein folding and evolution.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun,
66,
1190-1197.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Cao,
and
R.Elber
(2010).
Computational exploration of the network of sequence flow between protein structures.
|
| |
Proteins,
78,
985.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Bouvignies,
D.M.Korzhnev,
P.Neudecker,
D.F.Hansen,
M.H.Cordes,
and
L.E.Kay
(2010).
A simple method for measuring signs of (1)H (N) chemical shift differences between ground and excited protein states.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR,
47,
135-141.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
I.Yadid,
N.Kirshenbaum,
M.Sharon,
O.Dym,
and
D.S.Tawfik
(2010).
Metamorphic proteins mediate evolutionary transitions of structure.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
7287-7292.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Cardarelli,
L.G.Pell,
P.Neudecker,
N.Pirani,
A.Liu,
L.A.Baker,
J.L.Rubinstein,
K.L.Maxwell,
and
A.R.Davidson
(2010).
Phages have adapted the same protein fold to fulfill multiple functions in virion assembly.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
14384-14389.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Gramzow,
M.S.Ritz,
and
G.Theissen
(2010).
On the origin of MADS-domain transcription factors.
|
| |
Trends Genet,
26,
149-153.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.S.Kuhns,
A.T.Girvin,
L.O.Klein,
R.Chen,
K.D.Jensen,
E.W.Newell,
J.B.Huppa,
B.F.Lillemeier,
M.Huse,
Y.H.Chien,
K.C.Garcia,
and
M.M.Davis
(2010).
Evidence for a functional sidedness to the alphabetaTCR.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
5094-5099.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.N.Bryan,
and
J.Orban
(2010).
Proteins that switch folds.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
20,
482-488.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Pascual-García,
D.Abia,
A.R.Ortiz,
and
U.Bastolla
(2009).
Cross-over between discrete and continuous protein structure space: insights into automatic classification and networks of protein structures.
|
| |
PLoS Comput Biol,
5,
e1000331.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Petrey,
M.Fischer,
and
B.Honig
(2009).
Structural relationships among proteins with different global topologies and their implications for function annotation strategies.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
106,
17377-17382.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Horst,
and
R.Samudrala
(2009).
Diversity of protein structures and difficulties in fold recognition: the curious case of protein G.
|
| |
F1000 Biol Rep,
1,
69.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Skolnick,
A.K.Arakaki,
S.Y.Lee,
and
M.Brylinski
(2009).
The continuity of protein structure space is an intrinsic property of proteins.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
106,
15690-15695.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.J.Sippl
(2009).
Fold space unlimited.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
19,
312-320.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.A.Alexander,
Y.He,
Y.Chen,
J.Orban,
and
P.N.Bryan
(2009).
A minimal sequence code for switching protein structure and function.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
106,
21149-21154.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.R.Davidson
(2008).
A folding space odyssey.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
105,
2759-2760.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.S.Dubrava,
W.M.Ingram,
S.A.Roberts,
A.Weichsel,
W.R.Montfort,
and
M.H.Cordes
(2008).
N15 Cro and lambda Cro: orthologous DNA-binding domains with completely different but equally effective homodimer interfaces.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
17,
803-812.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |