 |
PDBsum entry 2p8c
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Nat Chem Biol
3:486-491
(2007)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Prediction and assignment of function for a divergent N-succinyl amino acid racemase.
|
|
L.Song,
C.Kalyanaraman,
A.A.Fedorov,
E.V.Fedorov,
M.E.Glasner,
S.Brown,
H.J.Imker,
P.C.Babbitt,
S.C.Almo,
M.P.Jacobson,
J.A.Gerlt.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The protein databases contain many proteins with unknown function. A
computational approach for predicting ligand specificity that requires only the
sequence of the unknown protein would be valuable for directing experiment-based
assignment of function. We focused on a family of unknown proteins in the
mechanistically diverse enolase superfamily and used two approaches to assign
function: (i) enzymatic assays using libraries of potential substrates, and (ii)
in silico docking of the same libraries using a homology model based on the most
similar (35% sequence identity) characterized protein. The results matched
closely; an experimentally determined structure confirmed the predicted
structure of the substrate-liganded complex. We assigned the N-succinyl
arginine/lysine racemase function to the family, correcting the annotation
(L-Ala-D/L-Glu epimerase) based on the function of the most similar
characterized homolog. These studies establish that ligand docking to a homology
model can facilitate functional assignment of unknown proteins by restricting
the identities of the possible substrates that must be experimentally tested.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
(a) AEE from B. subtilis with the L-Ala-L-Glu ligand as
determined by X-ray crystallography. (b) BC0371 with the
N-succinyl-L-arginine ligand as predicted by homology modeling
and docking. Catalytic residues are shown in tube
representation; ligands and critical binding site residues are
shown in ball-and-stick representation.
|
 |
Figure 3.
The homology-modeled active site is shown in cyan, and the
experimentally determined active site is shown in yellow. The
residues that determine substrate specificity are labeled.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
Nat Chem Biol
(2007,
3,
486-491)
copyright 2007.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
C.Kalyanaraman,
and
M.P.Jacobson
(2010).
Studying enzyme-substrate specificity in silico: a case study of the Escherichia coli glycolysis pathway.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
49,
4003-4005.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Bucci,
C.Goodman,
and
T.L.Sheppard
(2010).
A decade of chemical biology.
|
| |
Nat Chem Biol,
6,
847-854.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Chruszcz,
M.Domagalski,
T.Osinski,
A.Wlodawer,
and
W.Minor
(2010).
Unmet challenges of structural genomics.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
20,
587-597.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Vacic,
L.M.Iakoucheva,
S.Lonardi,
and
P.Radivojac
(2010).
Graphlet kernels for prediction of functional residues in protein structures.
|
| |
J Comput Biol,
17,
55-72.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Sakai,
A.A.Fedorov,
E.V.Fedorov,
A.M.Schnoes,
M.E.Glasner,
S.Brown,
M.E.Rutter,
K.Bain,
S.Chang,
T.Gheyi,
J.M.Sauder,
S.K.Burley,
P.C.Babbitt,
S.C.Almo,
and
J.A.Gerlt
(2009).
Evolution of enzymatic activities in the enolase superfamily: stereochemically distinct mechanisms in two families of cis,cis-muconate lactonizing enzymes.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
48,
1445-1453.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
B.H.Dessailly,
O.C.Redfern,
A.Cuff,
and
C.A.Orengo
(2009).
Exploiting structural classifications for function prediction: towards a domain grammar for protein function.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
19,
349-356.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.N.Cavasotto,
and
S.S.Phatak
(2009).
Homology modeling in drug discovery: current trends and applications.
|
| |
Drug Discov Today,
14,
676-683.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Fan,
J.J.Irwin,
B.M.Webb,
G.Klebe,
B.K.Shoichet,
and
A.Sali
(2009).
Molecular docking screens using comparative models of proteins.
|
| |
J Chem Inf Model,
49,
2512-2527.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.J.Atkinson,
J.H.Morris,
T.E.Ferrin,
and
P.C.Babbitt
(2009).
Using sequence similarity networks for visualization of relationships across diverse protein superfamilies.
|
| |
PLoS ONE,
4,
e4345.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.F.Rakus,
C.Kalyanaraman,
A.A.Fedorov,
E.V.Fedorov,
F.P.Mills-Groninger,
R.Toro,
J.Bonanno,
K.Bain,
J.M.Sauder,
S.K.Burley,
S.C.Almo,
M.P.Jacobson,
and
J.A.Gerlt
(2009).
Computation-facilitated assignment of the function in the enolase superfamily: a regiochemically distinct galactarate dehydratase from Oceanobacillus iheyensis .
|
| |
Biochemistry,
48,
11546-11558.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
P.B.Juhl,
P.Trodler,
S.Tyagi,
and
J.Pleiss
(2009).
Modelling substrate specificity and enantioselectivity for lipases and esterases by substrate-imprinted docking.
|
| |
BMC Struct Biol,
9,
39.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.D.Copley
(2009).
Prediction of function in protein superfamilies.
|
| |
F1000 Biol Rep,
1,
0.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Schwede,
A.Sali,
B.Honig,
M.Levitt,
H.M.Berman,
D.Jones,
S.E.Brenner,
S.K.Burley,
R.Das,
N.V.Dokholyan,
R.L.Dunbrack,
K.Fidelis,
A.Fiser,
A.Godzik,
Y.J.Huang,
C.Humblet,
M.P.Jacobson,
A.Joachimiak,
S.R.Krystek,
T.Kortemme,
A.Kryshtafovych,
G.T.Montelione,
J.Moult,
D.Murray,
R.Sanchez,
T.R.Sosnick,
D.M.Standley,
T.Stouch,
S.Vajda,
M.Vasquez,
J.D.Westbrook,
and
I.A.Wilson
(2009).
Outcome of a workshop on applications of protein models in biomedical research.
|
| |
Structure,
17,
151-159.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
U.Pieper,
R.Chiang,
J.J.Seffernick,
S.D.Brown,
M.E.Glasner,
L.Kelly,
N.Eswar,
J.M.Sauder,
J.B.Bonanno,
S.Swaminathan,
S.K.Burley,
X.Zheng,
M.R.Chance,
S.C.Almo,
J.A.Gerlt,
F.M.Raushel,
M.P.Jacobson,
P.C.Babbitt,
and
A.Sali
(2009).
Target selection and annotation for the structural genomics of the amidohydrolase and enolase superfamilies.
|
| |
J Struct Funct Genomics,
10,
107-125.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.P.Graves,
D.M.Shivakumar,
S.E.Boyce,
M.P.Jacobson,
D.A.Case,
and
B.K.Shoichet
(2008).
Rescoring docking hit lists for model cavity sites: predictions and experimental testing.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
377,
914-934.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Kalyanaraman,
H.J.Imker,
A.A.Fedorov,
E.V.Fedorov,
M.E.Glasner,
P.C.Babbitt,
S.C.Almo,
J.A.Gerlt,
and
M.P.Jacobson
(2008).
Discovery of a dipeptide epimerase enzymatic function guided by homology modeling and virtual screening.
|
| |
Structure,
16,
1668-1677.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Chen,
M.Misra,
L.Sower,
J.W.Peterson,
G.E.Kellogg,
and
C.H.Schein
(2008).
Novel inhibitors of anthrax edema factor.
|
| |
Bioorg Med Chem,
16,
7225-7233.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Dunaway-Mariano
(2008).
Enzyme function discovery.
|
| |
Structure,
16,
1599-1600.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.J.Imker,
J.Singh,
B.P.Warlick,
F.R.Tabita,
and
J.A.Gerlt
(2008).
Mechanistic diversity in the RuBisCO superfamily: a novel isomerization reaction catalyzed by the RuBisCO-like protein from Rhodospirillum rubrum.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
47,
11171-11173.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Bajorath
(2008).
Computational analysis of ligand relationships within target families.
|
| |
Curr Opin Chem Biol,
12,
352-358.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.F.Rakus,
A.A.Fedorov,
E.V.Fedorov,
M.E.Glasner,
B.K.Hubbard,
J.D.Delli,
P.C.Babbitt,
S.C.Almo,
and
J.A.Gerlt
(2008).
Evolution of enzymatic activities in the enolase superfamily: L-rhamnonate dehydratase.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
47,
9944-9954.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
R.A.Chiang,
A.Sali,
and
P.C.Babbitt
(2008).
Evolutionarily conserved substrate substructures for automated annotation of enzyme superfamilies.
|
| |
PLoS Comput Biol,
4,
e1000142.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.N.Allen
(2007).
Form finds function.
|
| |
Nat Chem Biol,
3,
452-453.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |