spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 2om2

Go to PDB code: 
protein ligands metals Protein-protein interface(s) links
Signaling protein PDB id
2om2

 

 

 

 

Loading ...

 
JSmol PyMol  
Contents
Protein chains
320 a.a. *
36 a.a. *
Ligands
GDP ×2
Metals
_MG ×2
Waters ×286
* Residue conservation analysis
PDB id:
2om2
Name: Signaling protein
Title: Crystal structure of human g[alpha]i1 bound to the goloco motif of rgs14
Structure: Guanine nucleotide-binding protein g(i), alpha-1 subunit. Chain: a, c. Fragment: g{alpha}i1. Synonym: adenylate cyclase-inhibiting g alpha protein. Engineered: yes. Regulator of g-protein signalling 14 goloco motif peptide. Chain: b, d. Engineered: yes
Source: Homo sapiens. Human. Organism_taxid: 9606. Gene: gnai1. Expressed in: escherichia coli bl21. Expression_system_taxid: 511693. Synthetic: yes. Other_details: the peptide was chemically synthesized. The sequence occurs naturally in homo sapiens (human).
Resolution:
2.20Å     R-factor:   0.227     R-free:   0.260
Authors: D.P.Siderovski,R.J.Kimple
Key ref:
D.W.Sammond et al. (2007). Structure-based Protocol for Identifying Mutations that Enhance Protein-Protein Binding Affinities. J Mol Biol, 371, 1392-1404. PubMed id: 17603074 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.096
Date:
20-Jan-07     Release date:   10-Jul-07    
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers
 References

Protein chains
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
P63096  (GNAI1_HUMAN) -  Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(i) subunit alpha-1 from Homo sapiens
Seq:
Struc:
354 a.a.
320 a.a.*
Protein chains
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
O43566  (RGS14_HUMAN) -  Regulator of G-protein signaling 14 from Homo sapiens
Seq:
Struc:
 
Seq:
Struc:
566 a.a.
36 a.a.
Key:    PfamA domain  Secondary structure  CATH domain
* PDB and UniProt seqs differ at 1 residue position (black cross)

 Enzyme reactions 
   Enzyme class: Chains A, C: E.C.3.6.5.-  - ?????
[IntEnz]   [ExPASy]   [KEGG]   [BRENDA]

 

 
DOI no: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.096 J Mol Biol 371:1392-1404 (2007)
PubMed id: 17603074  
 
 
Structure-based Protocol for Identifying Mutations that Enhance Protein-Protein Binding Affinities.
D.W.Sammond, Z.M.Eletr, C.Purbeck, R.J.Kimple, D.P.Siderovski, B.Kuhlman.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
The ability to manipulate protein binding affinities is important for the development of proteins as biosensors, industrial reagents, and therapeutics. We have developed a structure-based method to rationally predict single mutations at protein-protein interfaces that enhance binding affinities. The protocol is based on the premise that increasing buried hydrophobic surface area and/or reducing buried hydrophilic surface area will generally lead to enhanced affinity if large steric clashes are not introduced and buried polar groups are not left without a hydrogen bond partner. The procedure selects affinity enhancing point mutations at the protein-protein interface using three criteria: (1) the mutation must be from a polar amino acid to a non-polar amino acid or from a non-polar amino acid to a larger non-polar amino acid, (2) the free energy of binding as calculated with the Rosetta protein modeling program should be more favorable than the free energy of binding calculated for the wild-type complex and (3) the mutation should not be predicted to significantly destabilize the monomers. The performance of the computational protocol was experimentally tested on two separate protein complexes; Galpha(i1) from the heterotrimeric G-protein system bound to the RGS14 GoLoco motif, and the E2, UbcH7, bound to the E3, E6AP from the ubiquitin pathway. Twelve single-site mutations that were predicted to be stabilizing were synthesized and characterized in the laboratory. Nine of the 12 mutations successfully increased binding affinity with five of these increasing binding by over 1.0 kcal/mol. To further assess our approach we searched the literature for point mutations that pass our criteria and have experimentally determined binding affinities. Of the eight mutations identified, five were accurately predicted to increase binding affinity, further validating the method as a useful tool to increase protein-protein binding affinities.
 
  Selected figure(s)  
 
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Binding curves for select affinity increasing mutations compared to wild-type for (a) Gα[i1]:GoLoco and (b) E6AP:UbcH7.
 
  The above figure is reprinted by permission from Elsevier: J Mol Biol (2007, 371, 1392-1404) copyright 2007.  

Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference

  PubMed id Reference
21315107 A.F.Mehl, N.U G, Z.Ahmed, A.Wells, and T.D.Spyratos (2011).
Probing dimer interface stabilization within a four-helix bundle of the GrpE protein from Escherichia coli via internal deletion mutants: conversion of a dimer to monomer.
  Int J Biol Macromol, 48, 627-633.  
  21365678 O.Sharabi, A.Dekel, and J.M.Shifman (2011).
Triathlon for energy functions: who is the winner for design of protein-protein interactions?
  Proteins, 79, 1487-1498.  
20623647 O.Sharabi, C.Yanover, A.Dekel, and J.M.Shifman (2011).
Optimizing energy functions for protein-protein interface design.
  J Comput Chem, 32, 23-32.  
19820118 A.T.Frank, C.B.Ramsook, H.N.Otoo, C.Tan, G.Soybelman, J.M.Rauceo, N.K.Gaur, S.A.Klotz, and P.N.Lipke (2010).
Structure and function of glycosylated tandem repeats from Candida albicans Als adhesins.
  Eukaryot Cell, 9, 405-414.  
20007707 B.Li, L.Zhao, C.Wang, H.Guo, L.Wu, X.Zhang, W.Qian, H.Wang, and Y.Guo (2010).
The protein-protein interface evolution acts in a similar way to antibody affinity maturation.
  J Biol Chem, 285, 3865-3871.  
20525731 D.P.Nannemann, K.W.Kaufmann, J.Meiler, and B.O.Bachmann (2010).
Design and directed evolution of a dideoxy purine nucleoside phosphorylase.
  Protein Eng Des Sel, 23, 607-616.  
19899154 D.W.Sammond, Z.M.Eletr, C.Purbeck, and B.Kuhlman (2010).
Computational design of second-site suppressor mutations at protein-protein interfaces.
  Proteins, 78, 1055-1065.  
20598148 J.Tian, N.Wu, X.Chu, and Y.Fan (2010).
Predicting changes in protein thermostability brought about by single- or multi-site mutations.
  BMC Bioinformatics, 11, 370.  
19264795 B.Dassa, N.London, B.L.Stoddard, O.Schueler-Furman, and S.Pietrokovski (2009).
Fractured genes: a novel genomic arrangement involving new split inteins and a new homing endonuclease family.
  Nucleic Acids Res, 37, 2560-2573.  
19841629 D.J.Mandell, and T.Kortemme (2009).
Computer-aided design of functional protein interactions.
  Nat Chem Biol, 5, 797-807.  
19067791 H.Wakabayashi, A.E.Griffiths, and P.J.Fay (2009).
Combining mutations of charged residues at the A2 domain interface enhances factor VIII stability over single point mutations.
  J Thromb Haemost, 7, 438-444.  
19269963 H.Watanabe, H.Matsumaru, A.Ooishi, Y.Feng, T.Odahara, K.Suto, and S.Honda (2009).
Optimizing pH Response of Affinity between Protein G and IgG Fc: HOW ELECTROSTATIC MODULATIONS AFFECT PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS.
  J Biol Chem, 284, 12373-12383.
PDB codes: 2zw0 2zw1
19646858 J.Karanicolas, and B.Kuhlman (2009).
Computational design of affinity and specificity at protein-protein interfaces.
  Curr Opin Struct Biol, 19, 458-463.  
19626705 J.L.Jordan, J.W.Arndt, K.Hanf, G.Li, J.Hall, S.Demarest, F.Huang, X.Wu, B.Miller, S.Glaser, E.J.Fernandez, D.Wang, and A.Lugovskoy (2009).
Structural understanding of stabilization patterns in engineered bispecific Ig-like antibody molecules.
  Proteins, 77, 832-841.
PDB codes: 3hc0 3hc3 3hc4
18767161 J.N.Haidar, B.Pierce, Y.Yu, W.Tong, M.Li, and Z.Weng (2009).
Structure-based design of a T-cell receptor leads to nearly 100-fold improvement in binding affinity for pepMHC.
  Proteins, 74, 948-960.  
19437048 K.Khafizov (2009).
GoLoco motif proteins binding to Galpha(i1): insights from molecular simulations.
  J Mol Model, 15, 1491-1499.  
19643977 O.Sharabi, Y.Peleg, E.Mashiach, E.Vardy, Y.Ashani, I.Silman, J.L.Sussman, and J.M.Shifman (2009).
Design, expression and characterization of mutants of fasciculin optimized for interaction with its target, acetylcholinesterase.
  Protein Eng Des Sel, 22, 641-648.  
20004167 S.Chaudhury, and J.J.Gray (2009).
Identification of structural mechanisms of HIV-1 protease specificity using computational peptide docking: implications for drug resistance.
  Structure, 17, 1636-1648.  
18984596 F.S.Willard, Z.Zheng, J.Guo, G.J.Digby, A.J.Kimple, J.M.Conley, C.A.Johnston, D.Bosch, M.D.Willard, V.J.Watts, N.A.Lambert, S.R.Ikeda, Q.Du, and D.P.Siderovski (2008).
A Point Mutation to G{alpha}i Selectively Blocks GoLoco Motif Binding: DIRECT EVIDENCE FOR G{alpha}{middle dot}GoLoco COMPLEXES IN MITOTIC SPINDLE DYNAMICS.
  J Biol Chem, 283, 36698-36710.  
18650448 H.Wakabayashi, F.Varfaj, J.Deangelis, and P.J.Fay (2008).
Generation of enhanced stability factor VIII variants by replacement of charged residues at the A2 domain interface.
  Blood, 112, 2761-2769.  
The most recent references are shown first. Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be only a partial list as not all journals are covered by either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data so more and more references will be included with time. Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB codes are shown on the right.

 

spacer

spacer