 |
PDBsum entry 2nlc
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antimicrobial protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2nlc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Antimicrobial protein
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Human beta-defensin-1 (mutant ser8ala)
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Beta-defensin 1. Chain: a, b, c, d. Fragment: human beta-defensin 1, residues 33-68. Synonym: bd-1, defensin, beta 1, hbd-1. Engineered: yes. Mutation: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Homo sapiens. Human. Organism_taxid: 9606. Gene: defb1, bd1, hbd1. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562.
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
1.65Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.168
|
R-free:
|
0.204
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
J.Lubkowski,M.Pazgier
|
Key ref:
|
 |
M.Pazgier
et al.
(2007).
Studies of the biological properties of human beta-defensin 1.
J Biol Chem,
282,
1819-1829.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
20-Oct-06
|
Release date:
|
31-Oct-06
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P60022
(DEFB1_HUMAN) -
Beta-defensin 1 from Homo sapiens
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
68 a.a.
36 a.a.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
|
*
PDB and UniProt seqs differ
at 1 residue position (black
cross)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Biol Chem
282:1819-1829
(2007)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Studies of the biological properties of human beta-defensin 1.
|
|
M.Pazgier,
A.Prahl,
D.M.Hoover,
J.Lubkowski.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Defensins are small (30-45 amino acid residues) cationic proteins with broad
antimicrobial activity against many bacteria and fungi, some enveloped viruses,
and other activities such as chemoattraction of a range of different cell types
to the sites of inflammation. These proteins represent attractive targets for
developing novel antimicrobial agents and modulators of immune responses with
therapeutic applicability. In this report, we present the results of functional
and structural studies of 26 single-site mutants of human beta-defensin 1
(hBD1). All mutants were assayed for antimicrobial activity against Escherichia
coli (ATCC strain 25922) and for chemotactic activity with CCR6-transfected
HEK293 cells. To analyze the structural implications of mutagenesis and to
verify the correctness of the disulfide connectivity, we used x-ray
crystallography to conduct complete structural studies for 10 mutants in which
the topology of disulfides was the same as in the native hBD1. Mutations did not
induce significant changes of the tertiary structure, suggesting that the
observed alterations of biological properties of the mutants were solely
associated with changes in the respective side chains. We found that cationic
residues located near the C terminus (Arg(29), Lys(31), Lys(33), and Lys(36)) of
hBD1 define most of the anti-E. coli in vitro activity of this protein. In turn,
nearly all mutations altering the CCR6-mediated chemotaxis are located at one
area of the protein, defined by the N-terminal alpha-helical region (Asp(1)...
Ser(8)) and a few topologically adjacent residues (Lys(22), Arg(29), and
Lys(33)). These experimental results allow for the first time drafting of the
CCR6-epitope for a defensin molecule.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
FIGURE 2. Structural alignment of hBD-1 mutants and hBD-1
wild type. C[ ]traces of six
independent monomers of hBD-1 wild type (35) (red) were
superimposed on four monomers of the N04A mutant (green), four
monomers of S08A mutant (blue), two monomers of Q11A mutant
(magenta), two monomers of L13A mutant (cyan), two monomers of
L13E mutant (orange), four monomers of K22E mutant (gray), four
monomers Q24A (black), four monomers of Q24E mutant (yellow),
four monomers of K31A mutant (violet), and one monomer of K31E
mutant (pink). Ribbon representation of the secondary structure
of hBD-1 wild type is shown in the top right panel. The figure
was prepared with program PyMOL (pymol.org).
|
 |
Figure 5.
FIGURE 5. Surface distribution of the residues important
for antibacterial activity of hBD1. The electrostatic potential,
mapped on the solvent-accessible surface, is shown in the upper
panel. Contributions to the potential by the positively charged
residues are shown in blue, while the contributions by the
anionic residues are marked in red. The lower panel shows the
distribution of the residues identified as important for the
anti-E. coli activity of hBD1. The area of the molecule that,
upon mutation, led to increased activity is shown in green. The
residues found as determinants for high anti-E. coli activity
(RA[50] of their mutants was <0.11) are indicated in red (for
definition of RA[xx], see Table 4). The residues identified as
moderately important for anti-E. coli activity (RA[50] >0.3 and
RA[90] <0.11) are marked in yellow. The ribbon diagram of the
hBD1 monomer with side chains of all the residues identified
here as contributing to antibacterial activity of this protein
is also shown for reference. All objects are in equivalent or
rotated by 180° orientations. The figures were prepared with
programs PyMOL (pymol.org) and Grasp (53).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the ASBMB:
J Biol Chem
(2007,
282,
1819-1829)
copyright 2007.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
B.Liu,
and
E.Wilson
(2010).
The antimicrobial activity of CCL28 is dependent on C-terminal positively-charged amino acids.
|
| |
Eur J Immunol,
40,
186-196.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.L.Reynolds,
M.De Cecco,
K.Taylor,
C.Stanton,
F.Kilanowski,
J.Kalapothakis,
E.Seo,
D.Uhrin,
D.Campopiano,
J.Govan,
D.Macmillan,
P.Barran,
and
J.R.Dorin
(2010).
Peptide fragments of a beta-defensin derivative with potent bactericidal activity.
|
| |
Antimicrob Agents Chemother,
54,
1922-1929.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Schmitt,
Y.Gueguen,
E.Desmarais,
E.Bachère,
and
J.de Lorgeril
(2010).
Molecular diversity of antimicrobial effectors in the oyster Crassostrea gigas.
|
| |
BMC Evol Biol,
10,
23.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Taylor,
M.Rolfe,
N.Reynolds,
F.Kilanowski,
U.Pathania,
D.Clarke,
D.Yang,
J.Oppenheim,
K.Samuel,
S.Howie,
P.Barran,
D.Macmillan,
D.Campopiano,
and
J.Dorin
(2009).
Defensin-related peptide 1 (Defr1) is allelic to Defb8 and chemoattracts immature DC and CD4+ T cells independently of CCR6.
|
| |
Eur J Immunol,
39,
1353-1360.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Torrent,
V.M.Nogués,
and
E.Boix
(2009).
A theoretical approach to spot active regions in antimicrobial proteins.
|
| |
BMC Bioinformatics,
10,
373.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Antcheva,
F.Morgera,
L.Creatti,
L.Vaccari,
U.Pag,
S.Pacor,
Y.Shai,
H.G.Sahl,
and
A.Tossi
(2009).
Artificial beta-defensin based on a minimal defensin template.
|
| |
Biochem J,
421,
435-447.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.J.Hollox,
and
J.A.Armour
(2008).
Directional and balancing selection in human beta-defensins.
|
| |
BMC Evol Biol,
8,
113.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Taylor,
P.E.Barran,
and
J.R.Dorin
(2008).
Structure-activity relationships in beta-defensin peptides.
|
| |
Biopolymers,
90,
1-7.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Q.Xu,
A.A.Canutescu,
G.Wang,
M.Shapovalov,
Z.Obradovic,
and
R.L.Dunbrack
(2008).
Statistical analysis of interface similarity in crystals of homologous proteins.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
381,
487-507.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.J.Fijneman,
J.R.Peham,
M.A.van de Wiel,
G.A.Meijer,
I.Matise,
A.Velcich,
and
R.T.Cormier
(2008).
Expression of Pla2g2a prevents carcinogenesis in Muc2-deficient mice.
|
| |
Cancer Sci,
99,
2113-2119.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Verma,
S.Seebah,
S.M.Low,
L.Zhou,
S.P.Liu,
J.Li,
and
R.W.Beuerman
(2007).
Defensins: antimicrobial peptides for therapeutic development.
|
| |
Biotechnol J,
2,
1353-1359.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
|
');
}
}
 |