 |
PDBsum entry 2igp
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Nat Struct Biol
14:54-59
(2007)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
The Ndc80/HEC1 complex is a contact point for kinetochore-microtubule attachment.
|
|
R.R.Wei,
J.Al-Bassam,
S.C.Harrison.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Kinetochores are multicomponent assemblies that connect chromosomal centromeres
to mitotic-spindle microtubules. The Ndc80 complex is an essential core element
of kinetochores, conserved from yeast to humans. It is a rod-like assembly of
four proteins- Ndc80p (HEC1 in humans), Nuf2p, Spc24p and Spc25p. We describe
here the crystal structure of the most conserved region of HEC1, which lies at
one end of the rod and near the N terminus of the polypeptide chain. It folds
into a calponin-homology domain, resembling the microtubule-binding domain of
the plus-end-associated protein EB1. We show that an Ndc80p-Nuf2p heterodimer
binds microtubules in vitro. The less conserved, N-terminal segment of Ndc80p
contributes to the interaction and may be a crucial regulatory element. We
propose that the Ndc80 complex forms a direct link between kinetochore core
components and spindle microtubules.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
(a) Ribbon diagram of HEC1_CH (HEC[81–196]). (b) View from
the opposite direction to a, showing the potential
microtubule-binding site, analogous to that on EB1. Side chains
of Arg84, Phe125, Tyr160, Phe162 and Tyr187 are shown as sticks.
(c) Ribbon diagram of EB1 microtubule-binding domain (PDB
1PA7)^24 in the same orientation as HEC1_CH in a. (d) EB1
microtubule-binding domain, in the same orientation as HEC1_CH
in b, showing the proposed microtubule-binding site^24. The side
chains of Lys89 and its surrounding hydrophobic residues are
shown as sticks, with O and N in red and blue, respectively. N
and C termini are labeled.
|
 |
Figure 2.
(a,b) Surface representations of HEC1_CH in the orientations
of Figure 1a,b, respectively, colored by degree of conservation
(dark blue, most conserved; white, least conserved), showing
that the potential microtubule-binding surface is conserved
across species. (c,d) Surface representations showing
electrostatic potential of HEC1_CH and EB1 microtubule-binding
domain, in the orientations of Figure 1b,d, respectively. Red to
blue, -15 k[b]T to +15 k[b]T, as calculated by Delphi^49. (e)
Multiple sequence alignment for Ndc80/HEC1 and EB1 CH domain
(bottom), generated with CLUSTAL W^50. Secondary structural
elements derived from the crystal structure are colored as in
Figure 1a. Number of initial residue for each homolog is shown
after species name. Residues are colored by degree of
conservation: white letters on dark blue background, identical;
blue on blue-gray, strongly conserved; light blue on white,
weakly conserved. Lys89 of EB1, which is required for
microtubule binding, is boxed in red.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
Nat Struct Biol
(2007,
14,
54-59)
copyright 2007.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
D.Varma,
S.Chandrasekaran,
L.J.Sundin,
K.T.Reidy,
X.Wan,
D.A.Chasse,
K.R.Nevis,
J.G.DeLuca,
E.D.Salmon,
and
J.G.Cook
(2012).
Recruitment of the human Cdt1 replication licensing protein by the loop domain of Hec1 is required for stable kinetochore-microtubule attachment.
|
| |
Nat Cell Biol,
14,
593-603.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.M.Alushin,
V.Musinipally,
D.Matson,
J.Tooley,
P.T.Stukenberg,
and
E.Nogales
(2012).
Multimodal microtubule binding by the Ndc80 kinetochore complex.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
19,
1161-1167.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.M.Olszak,
D.van Essen,
A.J.Pereira,
S.Diehl,
T.Manke,
H.Maiato,
S.Saccani,
and
P.Heun
(2011).
Heterochromatin boundaries are hotspots for de novo kinetochore formation.
|
| |
Nat Cell Biol,
13,
799-808.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Orr,
and
C.E.Sunkel
(2011).
Drosophila CENP-C is essential for centromere identity.
|
| |
Chromosoma,
120,
83-96.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.L.Asbury,
J.F.Tien,
and
T.N.Davis
(2011).
Kinetochores' gripping feat: conformational wave or biased diffusion?
|
| |
Trends Cell Biol,
21,
38-46.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Zhang,
and
R.K.Dawe
(2011).
Mechanisms of plant spindle formation.
|
| |
Chromosome Res,
19,
335-344.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.F.Maure,
S.Komoto,
Y.Oku,
A.Mino,
S.Pasqualato,
K.Natsume,
L.Clayton,
A.Musacchio,
and
T.U.Tanaka
(2011).
The Ndc80 loop region facilitates formation of kinetochore attachment to the dynamic microtubule plus end.
|
| |
Curr Biol,
21,
207-213.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Tooley,
and
P.T.Stukenberg
(2011).
The Ndc80 complex: integrating the kinetochore's many movements.
|
| |
Chromosome Res,
19,
377-391.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.S.Hsu,
and
T.Toda
(2011).
Ndc80 internal loop interacts with Dis1/TOG to ensure proper kinetochore-spindle attachment in fission yeast.
|
| |
Curr Biol,
21,
214-220.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.P.Joglekar,
K.S.Bloom,
and
E.D.Salmon
(2010).
Mechanisms of force generation by end-on kinetochore-microtubule attachments.
|
| |
Curr Opin Cell Biol,
22,
57-67.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Petrovic,
S.Pasqualato,
P.Dube,
V.Krenn,
S.Santaguida,
D.Cittaro,
S.Monzani,
L.Massimiliano,
J.Keller,
A.Tarricone,
A.Maiolica,
H.Stark,
and
A.Musacchio
(2010).
The MIS12 complex is a protein interaction hub for outer kinetochore assembly.
|
| |
J Cell Biol,
190,
835-852.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.F.McEwen,
and
Y.Dong
(2010).
Contrasting models for kinetochore microtubule attachment in mammalian cells.
|
| |
Cell Mol Life Sci,
67,
2163-2172.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Leber,
B.Maier,
F.Fuchs,
J.Chi,
P.Riffel,
S.Anderhub,
L.Wagner,
A.D.Ho,
J.L.Salisbury,
M.Boutros,
and
A.Krämer
(2010).
Proteins required for centrosome clustering in cancer cells.
|
| |
Sci Transl Med,
2,
33ra38.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.P.Maskell,
X.W.Hu,
and
M.R.Singleton
(2010).
Molecular architecture and assembly of the yeast kinetochore MIND complex.
|
| |
J Cell Biol,
190,
823-834.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.R.Gestaut,
J.Cooper,
C.L.Asbury,
T.N.Davis,
and
L.Wordeman
(2010).
Reconstitution and functional analysis of kinetochore subcomplexes.
|
| |
Methods Cell Biol,
95,
641-656.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Lampert,
P.Hornung,
and
S.Westermann
(2010).
The Dam1 complex confers microtubule plus end-tracking activity to the Ndc80 kinetochore complex.
|
| |
J Cell Biol,
189,
641-649.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.M.Alushin,
V.H.Ramey,
S.Pasqualato,
D.A.Ball,
N.Grigorieff,
A.Musacchio,
and
E.Nogales
(2010).
The Ndc80 kinetochore complex forms oligomeric arrays along microtubules.
|
| |
Nature,
467,
805-810.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.P.Welburn,
M.Vleugel,
D.Liu,
J.R.Yates,
M.A.Lampson,
T.Fukagawa,
and
I.M.Cheeseman
(2010).
Aurora B phosphorylates spatially distinct targets to differentially regulate the kinetochore-microtubule interface.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
38,
383-392.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.D.Corbett,
C.K.Yip,
L.S.Ee,
T.Walz,
A.Amon,
and
S.C.Harrison
(2010).
The monopolin complex crosslinks kinetochore components to regulate chromosome-microtubule attachments.
|
| |
Cell,
142,
556-567.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
L.J.Sundin,
and
J.G.Deluca
(2010).
Kinetochores: NDC80 toes the line.
|
| |
Curr Biol,
20,
R1083-R1085.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.U.Tanaka
(2010).
Kinetochore-microtubule interactions: steps towards bi-orientation.
|
| |
EMBO J,
29,
4070-4082.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.F.Powers,
A.D.Franck,
D.R.Gestaut,
J.Cooper,
B.Gracyzk,
R.R.Wei,
L.Wordeman,
T.N.Davis,
and
C.L.Asbury
(2009).
The Ndc80 kinetochore complex forms load-bearing attachments to dynamic microtubule tips via biased diffusion.
|
| |
Cell,
136,
865-875.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Samoshkin,
A.Arnaoutov,
L.E.Jansen,
I.Ouspenski,
L.Dye,
T.Karpova,
J.McNally,
M.Dasso,
D.W.Cleveland,
and
A.Strunnikov
(2009).
Human condensin function is essential for centromeric chromatin assembly and proper sister kinetochore orientation.
|
| |
PLoS One,
4,
e6831.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Akiyoshi,
C.R.Nelson,
J.A.Ranish,
and
S.Biggins
(2009).
Analysis of Ipl1-mediated phosphorylation of the Ndc80 kinetochore protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
|
| |
Genetics,
183,
1591-1595.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Wu,
R.Wei,
E.Cheng,
B.Ngo,
and
W.H.Lee
(2009).
Hec1 contributes to mitotic centrosomal microtubule growth for proper spindle assembly through interaction with Hice1.
|
| |
Mol Biol Cell,
20,
4686-4695.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.P.Welburn,
E.L.Grishchuk,
C.B.Backer,
E.M.Wilson-Kubalek,
J.R.Yates,
and
I.M.Cheeseman
(2009).
The human kinetochore Ska1 complex facilitates microtubule depolymerization-coupled motility.
|
| |
Dev Cell,
16,
374-385.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Yuan,
N.Li,
K.Jiang,
T.Zhu,
Y.Huo,
C.Wang,
J.Lu,
A.Shaw,
K.Thomas,
J.Zhang,
D.Mann,
J.Liao,
C.Jin,
and
X.Yao
(2009).
PinX1 is a novel microtubule-binding protein essential for accurate chromosome segregation.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
23072-23082.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.R.Przewloka,
and
D.M.Glover
(2009).
The kinetochore and the centromere: a working long distance relationship.
|
| |
Annu Rev Genet,
43,
439-465.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Kemmler,
M.Stach,
M.Knapp,
J.Ortiz,
J.Pfannstiel,
T.Ruppert,
and
J.Lechner
(2009).
Mimicking Ndc80 phosphorylation triggers spindle assembly checkpoint signalling.
|
| |
EMBO J,
28,
1099-1110.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Qiu,
J.Wang,
C.Yu,
and
D.He
(2009).
CENP-K and CENP-H may form coiled-coils in the kinetochores.
|
| |
Sci China C Life Sci,
52,
352-359.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Santaguida,
and
A.Musacchio
(2009).
The life and miracles of kinetochores.
|
| |
EMBO J,
28,
2511-2531.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Zimniak,
K.Stengl,
K.Mechtler,
and
S.Westermann
(2009).
Phosphoregulation of the budding yeast EB1 homologue Bim1p by Aurora/Ipl1p.
|
| |
J Cell Biol,
186,
379-391.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Makrantoni,
and
M.J.Stark
(2009).
Efficient chromosome biorientation and the tension checkpoint in Saccharomyces cerevisiae both require Bir1.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
29,
4552-4562.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
X.Wan,
R.P.O'Quinn,
H.L.Pierce,
A.P.Joglekar,
W.E.Gall,
J.G.DeLuca,
C.W.Carroll,
S.T.Liu,
T.J.Yen,
B.F.McEwen,
P.T.Stukenberg,
A.Desai,
and
E.D.Salmon
(2009).
Protein architecture of the human kinetochore microtubule attachment site.
|
| |
Cell,
137,
672-684.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Akhmanova,
and
M.O.Steinmetz
(2008).
Tracking the ends: a dynamic protein network controls the fate of microtubule tips.
|
| |
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,
9,
309-322.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Sjöblom,
J.Ylänne,
and
K.Djinović-Carugo
(2008).
Novel structural insights into F-actin-binding and novel functions of calponin homology domains.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
18,
702-708.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Ciferri,
S.Pasqualato,
E.Screpanti,
G.Varetti,
S.Santaguida,
G.Dos Reis,
A.Maiolica,
J.Polka,
J.G.De Luca,
P.De Wulf,
M.Salek,
J.Rappsilber,
C.A.Moores,
E.D.Salmon,
and
A.Musacchio
(2008).
Implications for kinetochore-microtubule attachment from the structure of an engineered Ndc80 complex.
|
| |
Cell,
133,
427-439.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
C.L.Asbury,
and
T.N.Davis
(2008).
Insights into the kinetochore.
|
| |
Structure,
16,
834-836.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.J.Burke,
and
P.T.Stukenberg
(2008).
Linking kinetochore-microtubule binding to the spindle checkpoint.
|
| |
Dev Cell,
14,
474-479.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Diaz-Rodríguez,
R.Sotillo,
J.M.Schvartzman,
and
R.Benezra
(2008).
Hec1 overexpression hyperactivates the mitotic checkpoint and induces tumor formation in vivo.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
105,
16719-16724.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.M.Wilson-Kubalek,
I.M.Cheeseman,
C.Yoshioka,
A.Desai,
and
R.A.Milligan
(2008).
Orientation and structure of the Ndc80 complex on the microtubule lattice.
|
| |
J Cell Biol,
182,
1055-1061.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Civril,
and
A.Musacchio
(2008).
Spindly attachments.
|
| |
Genes Dev,
22,
2302-2307.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.J.Guimaraes,
Y.Dong,
B.F.McEwen,
and
J.G.Deluca
(2008).
Kinetochore-microtubule attachment relies on the disordered N-terminal tail domain of Hec1.
|
| |
Curr Biol,
18,
1778-1784.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Wu,
Y.T.Lin,
R.Wei,
Y.Chen,
Z.Shan,
and
W.H.Lee
(2008).
Hice1, a novel microtubule-associated protein required for maintenance of spindle integrity and chromosomal stability in human cells.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
28,
3652-3662.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
I.M.Cheeseman,
and
A.Desai
(2008).
Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule interface.
|
| |
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,
9,
33-46.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
I.M.Cheeseman,
T.Hori,
T.Fukagawa,
and
A.Desai
(2008).
KNL1 and the CENP-H/I/K Complex Coordinately Direct Kinetochore Assembly in Vertebrates.
|
| |
Mol Biol Cell,
19,
587-594.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Ohkuni,
R.Abdulle,
A.H.Tong,
C.Boone,
and
K.Kitagawa
(2008).
Ybp2 associates with the central kinetochore of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and mediates proper mitotic progression.
|
| |
PLoS ONE,
3,
e1617.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Gassmann,
A.Essex,
J.S.Hu,
P.S.Maddox,
F.Motegi,
A.Sugimoto,
S.M.O'Rourke,
B.Bowerman,
I.McLeod,
J.R.Yates,
K.Oegema,
I.M.Cheeseman,
and
A.Desai
(2008).
A new mechanism controlling kinetochore-microtubule interactions revealed by comparison of two dynein-targeting components: SPDL-1 and the Rod/Zwilch/Zw10 complex.
|
| |
Genes Dev,
22,
2385-2399.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Cai,
and
C.E.Walczak
(2008).
Kinetochore attachment: how the hec can a cell do it?
|
| |
Curr Biol,
18,
R1093-R1096.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.U.Tanaka
(2008).
Bi-orienting chromosomes: acrobatics on the mitotic spindle.
|
| |
Chromosoma,
117,
521-533.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.U.Tanaka,
and
A.Desai
(2008).
Kinetochore-microtubule interactions: the means to the end.
|
| |
Curr Opin Cell Biol,
20,
53-63.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.V.Vorozhko,
M.J.Emanuele,
M.J.Kallio,
P.T.Stukenberg,
and
G.J.Gorbsky
(2008).
Multiple mechanisms of chromosome movement in vertebrate cells mediated through the Ndc80 complex and dynein/dynactin.
|
| |
Chromosoma,
117,
169-179.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
X.Wang,
K.Fukuda,
I.J.Byeon,
A.Velyvis,
C.Wu,
A.Gronenborn,
and
J.Qin
(2008).
The structure of alpha-parvin CH2-paxillin LD1 complex reveals a novel modular recognition for focal adhesion assembly.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
21113-21119.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
H.W.Wang,
V.H.Ramey,
S.Westermann,
A.E.Leschziner,
J.P.Welburn,
Y.Nakajima,
D.G.Drubin,
G.Barnes,
and
E.Nogales
(2007).
Architecture of the Dam1 kinetochore ring complex and implications for microtubule-driven assembly and force-coupling mechanisms.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
14,
721-726.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.G.DeLuca
(2007).
Spindle microtubules: getting attached at both ends.
|
| |
Curr Biol,
17,
R966-R969.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.J.Miranda,
D.S.King,
and
S.C.Harrison
(2007).
Protein arms in the kinetochore-microtubule interface of the yeast DASH complex.
|
| |
Mol Biol Cell,
18,
2503-2510.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Wong,
Y.Nakajima,
S.Westermann,
C.Shang,
J.S.Kang,
C.Goodner,
P.Houshmand,
S.Fields,
C.S.Chan,
D.Drubin,
G.Barnes,
and
T.Hazbun
(2007).
A protein interaction map of the mitotic spindle.
|
| |
Mol Biol Cell,
18,
3800-3809.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.C.Slep,
and
R.D.Vale
(2007).
Structural basis of microtubule plus end tracking by XMAP215, CLIP-170, and EB1.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
27,
976-991.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Mapelli,
and
A.Musacchio
(2007).
MAD contortions: conformational dimerization boosts spindle checkpoint signaling.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
17,
716-725.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.E.McClelland,
S.Borusu,
A.C.Amaro,
J.R.Winter,
M.Belwal,
A.D.McAinsh,
and
P.Meraldi
(2007).
The CENP-A NAC/CAD kinetochore complex controls chromosome congression and spindle bipolarity.
|
| |
EMBO J,
26,
5033-5047.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Westermann,
D.G.Drubin,
and
G.Barnes
(2007).
Structures and functions of yeast kinetochore complexes.
|
| |
Annu Rev Biochem,
76,
563-591.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.N.Davis,
and
L.Wordeman
(2007).
Rings, bracelets, sleeves, and chevrons: new structures of kinetochore proteins.
|
| |
Trends Cell Biol,
17,
377-382.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Du,
and
R.K.Dawe
(2007).
Maize NDC80 is a constitutive feature of the central kinetochore.
|
| |
Chromosome Res,
15,
767-775.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |