 |
PDBsum entry 2f2m
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transport protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2f2m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Science
310:1950-1953
(2005)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
X-ray structure of the EmrE multidrug transporter in complex with a substrate.
|
|
O.Pornillos,
Y.J.Chen,
A.P.Chen,
G.Chang.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
EmrE is a prototype of the Small Multidrug Resistance family of efflux
transporters and actively expels positively charged hydrophobic drugs across the
inner membrane of Escherichia coli. Here, we report the x-ray crystal structure,
at 3.7 angstrom resolution, of one conformational state of the EmrE transporter
in complex with a translocation substrate, tetraphenylphosphonium. Two EmrE
polypeptides form a homodimeric transporter that binds substrate at the
dimerization interface. The two subunits have opposite orientations in the
membrane and adopt slightly different folds, forming an asymmetric antiparallel
dimer. This unusual architecture likely confers unidirectionality to transport
by creating an asymmetric substrate translocation pathway. On the basis of
available structural data, we propose a model for the proton-dependent drug
efflux mechanism of EmrE.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Fig. 3. Comparison of the x-ray and EM structures of EmrE-TPP.
(A) Independent superposition of EmrE subunits A and B in the
x-ray structure with a cylinder model (colored gray) derived
from the EM structure of EmrE-TPP (European Molecular Biology
Laboratory-EBI accession code EMD-1087) (13). A unique match was
found using two constraints: Three-helix bundles on opposite
sides of the dimer were assumed to be helices 1 to 3, and the
helix closest to the density attributed to TPP in the EM map was
assumed to be helix 1. In this pseudo-atomic model, three
helices have notably different tilt angles: A2, B2, and B3
(shown by red asterisks). The x-ray position of helices B2 and
B3, which appear to move as a unit, is likely due to crystal
packing interactions along the putative tetramerization
interface (see also Fig. 1E). We speculate that the
conformational change in helix A2 is relevant to the drug
transport mechanism. (B and C) The TPP molecule is bound to
different sites in the x-ray structure (C) and EM model (B),
suggesting a possible mechanism for drug transport. The relative
positions of the EmrE helices are indicated, viewing toward the
binding pockets (in the same orientation as in Fig. 1C). The
positions of the TPP molecules are shown by red circles.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Fig. 4. A potential mechanism for proton-dependent drug
translocation by EmrE. For clarity, only the three putative
gating helices (A1, A2, and B1) and two membrane-embedded Glu-14
side chains are shown explicitly. Drug substrates and protons
are represented by the yellow sphere and red balls,
respectively.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the AAAs:
Science
(2005,
310,
1950-1953)
copyright 2005.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
F.Junge,
S.Haberstock,
C.Roos,
S.Stefer,
D.Proverbio,
V.Dötsch,
and
F.Bernhard
(2011).
Advances in cell-free protein synthesis for the functional and structural analysis of membrane proteins.
|
| |
N Biotechnol,
28,
262-271.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.W.Gilmour,
M.Graham,
G.Van Domselaar,
S.Tyler,
H.Kent,
K.M.Trout-Yakel,
O.Larios,
V.Allen,
B.Lee,
and
C.Nadon
(2010).
High-throughput genome sequencing of two Listeria monocytogenes clinical isolates during a large foodborne outbreak.
|
| |
BMC Genomics,
11,
120.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.E.Poulsen,
A.Rath,
and
C.M.Deber
(2009).
The assembly motif of a bacterial small multidrug resistance protein.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
9870-9875.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.E.Tronrud,
and
B.W.Matthews
(2009).
Sorting the chaff from the wheat at the PDB.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
18,
2-5.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.D.Jeffrey
(2009).
Analysis of errors in the structure determination of MsbA.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
65,
193-199.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Balaz
(2009).
Modeling kinetics of subcellular disposition of chemicals.
|
| |
Chem Rev,
109,
1793-1899.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.M.Korkhov,
and
C.G.Tate
(2009).
An emerging consensus for the structure of EmrE.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
65,
186-192.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Kajiyama,
M.Otagiri,
J.Sekiguchi,
T.Kudo,
and
S.Kosono
(2009).
The MrpA, MrpB and MrpD subunits of the Mrp antiporter complex in Bacillus subtilis contain membrane-embedded and essential acidic residues.
|
| |
Microbiology,
155,
2137-2147.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Choi,
J.Jeon,
J.S.Yang,
and
S.Kim
(2008).
Common occurrence of internal repeat symmetry in membrane proteins.
|
| |
Proteins,
71,
68-80.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Steiner-Mordoch,
M.Soskine,
D.Solomon,
D.Rotem,
A.Gold,
M.Yechieli,
Y.Adam,
and
S.Schuldiner
(2008).
Parallel topology of genetically fused EmrE homodimers.
|
| |
EMBO J,
27,
17-26.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Yan,
Z.Guan,
and
C.R.Raetz
(2007).
An undecaprenyl phosphate-aminoarabinose flippase required for polymyxin resistance in Escherichia coli.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
282,
36077-36089.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.W.Matthews
(2007).
Five retracted structure reports: inverted or incorrect?
|
| |
Protein Sci,
16,
1013-1016.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.N.Brown,
and
S.Ramaswamy
(2007).
Quality of protein crystal structures.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
63,
941-950.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Lundstrom
(2007).
Structural genomics and drug discovery.
|
| |
J Cell Mol Med,
11,
224-238.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Liguori,
B.Marques,
A.Villegas-Méndez,
R.Rothe,
and
J.L.Lenormand
(2007).
Production of membrane proteins using cell-free expression systems.
|
| |
Expert Rev Proteomics,
4,
79-90.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.F.Poget,
S.M.Cahill,
and
M.E.Girvin
(2007).
Isotropic bicelles stabilize the functional form of a small multidrug-resistance pump for NMR structural studies.
|
| |
J Am Chem Soc,
129,
2432-2433.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Schuldiner
(2007).
When biochemistry meets structural biology: the cautionary tale of EmrE.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci,
32,
252-258.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.J.Chen,
O.Pornillos,
S.Lieu,
C.Ma,
A.P.Chen,
and
G.Chang
(2007).
X-ray structure of EmrE supports dual topology model.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
104,
18999-19004.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Erni
(2006).
The mannose transporter complex: an open door for the macromolecular invasion of bacteria.
|
| |
J Bacteriol,
188,
7036-7038.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.G.Tate
(2006).
Comparison of three structures of the multidrug transporter EmrE.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
16,
457-464.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Klammt,
D.Schwarz,
F.Löhr,
B.Schneider,
V.Dötsch,
and
F.Bernhard
(2006).
Cell-free expression as an emerging technique for the large scale production of integral membrane protein.
|
| |
FEBS J,
273,
4141-4153.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Basting,
I.Lehner,
M.Lorch,
and
C.Glaubitz
(2006).
Investigating transport proteins by solid state NMR.
|
| |
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol,
372,
451-464.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.von Heijne
(2006).
Membrane-protein topology.
|
| |
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,
7,
909-918.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.U.Bowie
(2006).
Flip-flopping membrane proteins.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
13,
94-96.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Rapp,
E.Granseth,
S.Seppälä,
and
G.von Heijne
(2006).
Identification and evolution of dual-topology membrane proteins.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
13,
112-116.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.J.Fleishman,
and
N.Ben-Tal
(2006).
Progress in structure prediction of alpha-helical membrane proteins.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
16,
496-504.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Wagner,
M.L.Bader,
D.Drew,
and
J.W.de Gier
(2006).
Rationalizing membrane protein overexpression.
|
| |
Trends Biotechnol,
24,
364-371.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Endo,
and
T.Sawasaki
(2006).
Cell-free expression systems for eukaryotic protein production.
|
| |
Curr Opin Biotechnol,
17,
373-380.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |