spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 2e4u

Go to PDB code: 
protein ligands Protein-protein interface(s) links
Signaling protein PDB id
2e4u

 

 

 

 

Loading ...

 
JSmol PyMol  
Contents
Protein chains
512 a.a. *
Ligands
NAG ×2
GLU ×2
Waters ×274
* Residue conservation analysis
PDB id:
2e4u
Name: Signaling protein
Title: Crystal structure of the extracellular region of the group ii metabotropic glutamate receptor complexed with l-glutamate
Structure: Metabotropic glutamate receptor 3. Chain: a, b. Fragment: extracellular region. Synonym: mglur3, group ii metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 3. Engineered: yes. Mutation: yes
Source: Rattus norvegicus. Norway rat. Organism_taxid: 10116. Expressed in: trichoplusia ni. Expression_system_taxid: 7111. Expression_system_cell_line: high five.
Resolution:
2.35Å     R-factor:   0.238     R-free:   0.267
Authors: T.Muto,D.Tsuchiya,K.Morikawa,H.Jingami
Key ref:
T.Muto et al. (2007). Structures of the extracellular regions of the group II/III metabotropic glutamate receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104, 3759-3764. PubMed id: 17360426 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0611577104
Date:
17-Dec-06     Release date:   27-Feb-07    
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers
 References

Protein chains
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
P31422  (GRM3_RAT) -  Metabotropic glutamate receptor 3 from Rattus norvegicus
Seq:
Struc:
 
Seq:
Struc:
879 a.a.
512 a.a.*
Key:    PfamA domain  Secondary structure  CATH domain
* PDB and UniProt seqs differ at 2 residue positions (black crosses)

 

 
DOI no: 10.1073/pnas.0611577104 Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:3759-3764 (2007)
PubMed id: 17360426  
 
 
Structures of the extracellular regions of the group II/III metabotropic glutamate receptors.
T.Muto, D.Tsuchiya, K.Morikawa, H.Jingami.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
Metabotropic glutamate receptors play major roles in the activation of excitatory synapses in the central nerve system. We determined the crystal structure of the entire extracellular region of the group II receptor and that of the ligand-binding region of the group III receptor. A comparison among groups I, II, and III provides the structural basis that could account for the discrimination of group-specific agonists. Furthermore, the structure of group II includes the cysteine-rich domain, which is tightly linked to the ligand-binding domain by a disulfide bridge, suggesting a potential role in transmitting a ligand-induced conformational change into the downstream transmembrane region. The structure also reveals the lateral interaction between the two cysteine-rich domains, which could stimulate clustering of the dimeric receptors on the cell surface. We propose a general activation mechanism of the dimeric receptor coupled with both ligand-binding and interprotomer rearrangements.
 
  Selected figure(s)  
 
Figure 3.
Fig. 3. Agonist recognition by mGluR-II[3]. Schematic drawings for the binding of Glu (A), DCG-IV (B), 1S,3S-ACPD (C), 1S,3R-ACPD (D), and 2R,4R-APDC (E). Hydrogen atoms attached at the C[ ]atom of the ligands are modeled with the corresponding ideal geometries. Only the residues/water molecules that directly interact with one of the agonists are drawn. Red and blue lines indicate hydrogen-bonding and VDW contact, respectively. Either of the two carboxyl oxygen atoms connected by the green line in B is likely to be protonated, as suggested from the short distance between them (2.4 Å).
Figure 4.
Fig. 4. The ligand-binding pocket. (A) Conserved amino acid residues involved in ligand binding. Red, green, and blue stick models represent the structures for mGluR-I[1], mGluR-II[3], and mGluR-III[7], respectively. The three closed protomers were superimposed by least-square fitting. The model of the closed mGluR-III[7] was constructed as described in the text. (B) Difference in the open angle of the closed protomer between mGluR-I[1] (purple) and mGluR-II[3] (green). The yellow stick model represents the bound Glu. The black arrow indicates the view direction in A. (C–E) The ligand-binding pockets of mGluR-I[1] (C), mGluR-II[3] (D), and mGluR-III[7] (E) as viewed in A. Each molecular model is colored as in Fig. 1B. Red lines indicate the conserved surface shown in A. (F) Diagram representing the DCG-IV binding of mGluR-II[3], viewed from directions similar to that in A. The structure of the closed protomers of mGluR-I[1] (green) (4) is superimposed onto the mGluR-II[3]structures (yellow).
 
  Figures were selected by an automated process.  

Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference

  PubMed id Reference
21063387 C.Monnier, H.Tu, E.Bourrier, C.Vol, L.Lamarque, E.Trinquet, J.P.Pin, and P.Rondard (2011).
Trans-activation between 7TM domains: implication in heterodimeric GABAB receptor activation.
  EMBO J, 30, 32-42.  
20621106 F.C.Acher, C.Selvam, J.P.Pin, C.Goudet, and H.O.Bertrand (2011).
A critical pocket close to the glutamate binding site of mGlu receptors opens new possibilities for agonist design.
  Neuropharmacology, 60, 102-107.  
21036182 F.Nicoletti, J.Bockaert, G.L.Collingridge, P.J.Conn, F.Ferraguti, D.D.Schoepp, J.T.Wroblewski, and J.P.Pin (2011).
Metabotropic glutamate receptors: From the workbench to the bedside.
  Neuropharmacology, 60, 1017-1041.  
21317871 M.Sukumaran, M.Rossmann, I.Shrivastava, A.Dutta, I.Bahar, and I.H.Greger (2011).
Dynamics and allosteric potential of the AMPA receptor N-terminal domain.
  EMBO J, 30, 972-982.
PDB codes: 3o21 3p3w
20713070 P.Rondard, C.Goudet, J.Kniazeff, J.P.Pin, and L.Prézeau (2011).
The complexity of their activation mechanism opens new possibilities for the modulation of mGlu and GABAB class C G protein-coupled receptors.
  Neuropharmacology, 60, 82-92.  
20673774 R.E.Hubbard (2011).
Structure-based drug discovery and protein targets in the CNS.
  Neuropharmacology, 60, 7.  
20705075 S.Topiol, M.Sabio, and M.Uberti (2011).
Exploration of structure-based drug design opportunities for mGluRs.
  Neuropharmacology, 60, 93.  
20055706 C.M.Niswender, and P.J.Conn (2010).
Metabotropic glutamate receptors: physiology, pharmacology, and disease.
  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol, 50, 295-322.  
20302879 F.M.Assadi-Porter, E.L.Maillet, J.T.Radek, J.Quijada, J.L.Markley, and M.Max (2010).
Key amino acid residues involved in multi-point binding interactions between brazzein, a sweet protein, and the T1R2-T1R3 human sweet receptor.
  J Mol Biol, 398, 584-599.  
19664591 F.M.Assadi-Porter, M.Tonelli, E.L.Maillet, J.L.Markley, and M.Max (2010).
Interactions between the human sweet-sensing T1R2-T1R3 receptor and sweeteners detected by saturation transfer difference NMR spectroscopy.
  Biochim Biophys Acta, 1798, 82-86.  
20173095 F.Zhang, B.Klebansky, R.M.Fine, H.Liu, H.Xu, G.Servant, M.Zoller, C.Tachdjian, and X.Li (2010).
Molecular mechanism of the sweet taste enhancers.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107, 4752-4757.  
20136834 M.A.Khan, and A.D.Conigrave (2010).
Mechanisms of multimodal sensing by extracellular Ca(2+)-sensing receptors: a domain-based survey of requirements for binding and signalling.
  Br J Pharmacol, 159, 1039-1050.  
20129919 S.Matsushita, H.Nakata, Y.Kubo, and M.Tateyama (2010).
Ligand-induced rearrangements of the GABA(B) receptor revealed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer.
  J Biol Chem, 285, 10291-10299.  
19465914 J.Kumar, P.Schuck, R.Jin, and M.L.Mayer (2009).
The N-terminal domain of GluR6-subtype glutamate receptor ion channels.
  Nat Struct Mol Biol, 16, 631-638.
PDB codes: 3h6g 3h6h
19275426 J.Reingruber, E.Abad, and D.Holcman (2009).
Narrow escape time to a structured target located on the boundary of a microdomain.
  J Chem Phys, 130, 094909.  
19402024 L.Lundström, B.Kuhn, J.Beck, E.Borroni, J.G.Wettstein, T.J.Woltering, and S.Gatti (2009).
Mutagenesis and molecular modeling of the orthosteric binding site of the mGlu2 receptor determining interactions of the group II receptor antagonist (3)H-HYDIA.
  ChemMedChem, 4, 1086-1094.  
19549872 P.Marcaggi, H.Mutoh, D.Dimitrov, M.Beato, and T.Knöpfel (2009).
Optical measurement of mGluR1 conformational changes reveals fast activation, slow deactivation, and sensitization.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106, 11388-11393.  
19298394 P.Wellendorph, and H.Bräuner-Osborne (2009).
Molecular basis for amino acid sensing by family C G-protein-coupled receptors.
  Br J Pharmacol, 156, 869-884.  
19461580 R.Jin, S.K.Singh, S.Gu, H.Furukawa, A.I.Sobolevsky, J.Zhou, Y.Jin, and E.Gouaux (2009).
Crystal structure and association behaviour of the GluR2 amino-terminal domain.
  EMBO J, 28, 1812-1823.
PDB codes: 3h5v 3h5w
19598234 S.W.Fan, R.A.George, N.L.Haworth, L.L.Feng, J.Y.Liu, and M.A.Wouters (2009).
Conformational changes in redox pairs of protein structures.
  Protein Sci, 18, 1745-1765.  
  19255473 T.Muto, D.Tsuchiya, K.Morikawa, and H.Jingami (2009).
Site-specific unglycosylation to improve crystallization of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 3 extracellular domain.
  Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun, 65, 236-241.  
19104071 F.Zhang, B.Klebansky, R.M.Fine, H.Xu, A.Pronin, H.Liu, C.Tachdjian, and X.Li (2008).
Molecular mechanism for the umami taste synergism.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 105, 20930-20934.  
17965750 G.Milligan (2008).
A day in the life of a G protein-coupled receptor: the contribution to function of G protein-coupled receptor dimerization.
  Br J Pharmacol, 153, S216-S229.  
18382464 M.C.Lagerström, and H.B.Schiöth (2008).
Structural diversity of G protein-coupled receptors and significance for drug discovery.
  Nat Rev Drug Discov, 7, 339-357.  
18315847 N.Yanamala, K.C.Tirupula, and J.Klein-Seetharaman (2008).
Preferential binding of allosteric modulators to active and inactive conformational states of metabotropic glutamate receptors.
  BMC Bioinformatics, 9, S16.  
18388862 P.Rondard, S.Huang, C.Monnier, H.Tu, B.Blanchard, N.Oueslati, F.Malhaire, Y.Li, E.Trinquet, G.Labesse, J.P.Pin, and J.Liu (2008).
Functioning of the dimeric GABA(B) receptor extracellular domain revealed by glycan wedge scanning.
  EMBO J, 27, 1321-1332.  
17848137 P.S.Park, D.T.Lodowski, and K.Palczewski (2008).
Activation of g protein-coupled receptors: beyond two-state models and tertiary conformational changes.
  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol, 48, 107-141.  
18058780 T.J.Woltering, G.Adam, P.Huguenin, J.Wichmann, S.Kolczewski, S.Gatti, A.Bourson, J.N.Kew, G.Richards, J.A.Kemp, V.Mutel, and F.Knoflach (2008).
Asymmetric synthesis and receptor pharmacology of the group II mGlu receptor ligand (1S,2R,3R,5R,6S)-2-amino-3-hydroxy-bicyclo[3.1.0]hexane-2,6-dicarboxylic acid-HYDIA.
  ChemMedChem, 3, 323-335.  
18384890 V.V.Gurevich, and E.V.Gurevich (2008).
How and why do GPCRs dimerize?
  Trends Pharmacol Sci, 29, 234-240.  
17576421 D.McGarrigle, and X.Y.Huang (2007).
Methuselah antagonist extends life span.
  Nat Chem Biol, 3, 371-372.  
17979873 J.Hu, and A.M.Spiegel (2007).
Structure and function of the human calcium-sensing receptor: insights from natural and engineered mutations and allosteric modulators.
  J Cell Mol Med, 11, 908-922.  
  17620729 T.Muto, D.Tsuchiya, K.Morikawa, and H.Jingami (2007).
Expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of the ligand-binding domain of metabotropic glutamate receptor 7.
  Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun, 63, 627-630.  
The most recent references are shown first. Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be only a partial list as not all journals are covered by either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data so more and more references will be included with time. Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB codes are shown on the right.

 

spacer

spacer