|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 a.a.*
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 a.a.*
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113 a.a.*
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
* C-alpha coords only
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Ribosome
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Structure of trigger factor binding domain in biologically homologous complex with eubacterial ribosome.
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
23s ribosomal RNA. Chain: 0. 50s ribosomal protein l23. Chain: r. 50s ribosomal protein l29. Chain: w. Trigger factor. Chain: 7. Fragment: n-terminal domain.
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Deinococcus radiodurans. Organism_taxid: 1299. Organism_taxid: 1299
|
|
Biol. unit:
|
 |
Tetramer (from
)
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
3.50Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.251
|
R-free:
|
0.320
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
D.Baram,E.Pyetan,A.Sittner,T.Auerbach-Nevo,A.Bashan,A.Yonath
|
Key ref:
|
 |
D.Baram
et al.
(2005).
Structure of trigger factor binding domain in biologically homologous complex with eubacterial ribosome reveals its chaperone action.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
102,
12017-12022.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
14-Jul-05
|
Release date:
|
23-Aug-05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q9RXK0
(RL23_DEIRA) -
Large ribosomal subunit protein uL23 from Deinococcus radiodurans (strain ATCC 13939 / DSM 20539 / JCM 16871 / CCUG 27074 / LMG 4051 / NBRC 15346 / NCIMB 9279 / VKM B-1422 / R1)
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
95 a.a.
93 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class 1:
|
 |
Chain 7:
E.C.5.2.1.8
- peptidylprolyl isomerase.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
[protein]-peptidylproline (omega=180) = [protein]-peptidylproline (omega=0)
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Peptidylproline (omega=180)
|
=
|
peptidylproline (omega=0)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class 2:
|
 |
Chains R, W:
E.C.?
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Note, where more than one E.C. class is given (as above), each may
correspond to a different protein domain or, in the case of polyprotein
precursors, to a different mature protein.
|
|
 |
|
Molecule diagrams generated from .mol files obtained from the
KEGG ftp site
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
102:12017-12022
(2005)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structure of trigger factor binding domain in biologically homologous complex with eubacterial ribosome reveals its chaperone action.
|
|
D.Baram,
E.Pyetan,
A.Sittner,
T.Auerbach-Nevo,
A.Bashan,
A.Yonath.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Trigger factor (TF), the first chaperone in eubacteria to encounter the emerging
nascent chain, binds to the large ribosomal subunit in the vicinity of the
protein exit tunnel opening and forms a sheltered folding space. Here, we
present the 3.5-A crystal structure of the physiological complex of the large
ribosomal subunit from the eubacterium Deinococcus radiodurans with the
N-terminal domain of TF (TFa) from the same organism. For anchoring, TFa
exploits a small ribosomal surface area in the vicinity of proteins L23 and L29,
by using its "signature motif" as well as additional structural
elements. The molecular details of TFa interactions reveal that L23 is essential
for the association of TF with the ribosome and may serve as a channel of
communication with the nascent chain progressing in the tunnel. L29 appears to
induce a conformational change in TFa, which results in the exposure of TFa
hydrophobic patches to the opening of the ribosomal exit tunnel, thus increasing
its affinity for hydrophobic segments of the emerging nascent polypeptide. This
observation implies that, in addition to creating a protected folding space for
the emerging nascent chain, TF association with the ribosome prevents
aggregation by providing a competing hydrophobic environment and may be critical
for attaining the functional conformation necessary for chaperone activity.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Fig. 2. The crystallographic structure of bound TFa. (a)
Structure of TFa upon association with the ribosome. (b) An
unbiased 2F[o] - F[c] electron density map around helix A1,
contoured at 1.5 .
|
 |
Figure 4.
Fig. 4. Detailed molecular interactions of TFa (orange)
with ribosomal proteins L23 (blue) (a and b) and L29 (magenta)
(c).
|
 |
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
D.V.Fedyukina,
and
S.Cavagnero
(2011).
Protein folding at the exit tunnel.
|
| |
Annu Rev Biophys,
40,
337-359.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Brandt,
L.A.Carlson,
F.U.Hartl,
W.Baumeister,
and
K.Grünewald
(2010).
The three-dimensional organization of polyribosomes in intact human cells.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
39,
560-569.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Hoffmann,
and
B.Bukau
(2009).
Trigger factor finds new jobs and contacts.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
16,
1006-1008.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Yonath
(2009).
Large facilities and the evolving ribosome, the cellular machine for genetic-code translation.
|
| |
J R Soc Interface,
6,
S575-S585.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Giglione,
S.Fieulaine,
and
T.Meinnel
(2009).
Cotranslational processing mechanisms: towards a dynamic 3D model.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci,
34,
417-426.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Brandt,
S.A.Etchells,
J.O.Ortiz,
A.H.Elcock,
F.U.Hartl,
and
W.Baumeister
(2009).
The native 3D organization of bacterial polysomes.
|
| |
Cell,
136,
261-271.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.U.Hartl,
and
M.Hayer-Hartl
(2009).
Converging concepts of protein folding in vitro and in vivo.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
16,
574-581.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Kramer,
D.Boehringer,
N.Ban,
and
B.Bukau
(2009).
The ribosome as a platform for co-translational processing, folding and targeting of newly synthesized proteins.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
16,
589-597.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
I.A.Buskiewicz,
J.Jöckel,
M.V.Rodnina,
and
W.Wintermeyer
(2009).
Conformation of the signal recognition particle in ribosomal targeting complexes.
|
| |
RNA,
15,
44-54.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.P.Ellis,
P.H.Culviner,
and
S.Cavagnero
(2009).
Confined dynamics of a ribosome-bound nascent globin: Cone angle analysis of fluorescence depolarization decays in the presence of two local motions.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
18,
2003-2015.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Merz,
D.Boehringer,
C.Schaffitzel,
S.Preissler,
A.Hoffmann,
T.Maier,
A.Rutkowska,
J.Lozza,
N.Ban,
B.Bukau,
and
E.Deuerling
(2008).
Molecular mechanism and structure of Trigger Factor bound to the translating ribosome.
|
| |
EMBO J,
27,
1622-1632.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.P.Ellis,
C.K.Bakke,
R.N.Kirchdoerfer,
L.M.Jungbauer,
and
S.Cavagnero
(2008).
Chain dynamics of nascent polypeptides emerging from the ribosome.
|
| |
ACS Chem Biol,
3,
555-566.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Peisker,
D.Braun,
T.Wölfle,
J.Hentschel,
U.Fünfschilling,
G.Fischer,
A.Sickmann,
and
S.Rospert
(2008).
Ribosome-associated complex binds to ribosomes in close proximity of Rpl31 at the exit of the polypeptide tunnel in yeast.
|
| |
Mol Biol Cell,
19,
5279-5288.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Selmer,
and
A.Liljas
(2008).
Exit biology: battle for the nascent chain.
|
| |
Structure,
16,
498-500.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.L.Ross,
R.R.Patel,
T.C.Mendelson,
and
V.C.Ware
(2007).
Functional conservation between structurally diverse ribosomal proteins from Drosophila melanogaster and Saccharomyces cerevisiae: fly L23a can substitute for yeast L25 in ribosome assembly and function.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
35,
4503-4514.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Martinez-Hackert,
and
W.A.Hendrickson
(2007).
Structures of and interactions between domains of trigger factor from Thermotoga maritima.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
63,
536-547.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Shi,
D.J.Fan,
S.X.Li,
H.J.Zhang,
S.Perrett,
and
J.M.Zhou
(2007).
Identification of a potential hydrophobic peptide binding site in the C-terminal arm of trigger factor.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
16,
1165-1175.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Yonath
(2006).
Molecular biology: triggering positive competition.
|
| |
Nature,
444,
435-436.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.M.Kaiser,
H.C.Chang,
V.R.Agashe,
S.K.Lakshmipathy,
S.A.Etchells,
M.Hayer-Hartl,
F.U.Hartl,
and
J.M.Barral
(2006).
Real-time observation of trigger factor function on translating ribosomes.
|
| |
Nature,
444,
455-460.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.W.Heinz,
M.S.Weiss,
and
K.U.Wendt
(2006).
Biomacromolecular interactions, assemblies and machines: a structural view.
|
| |
Chembiochem,
7,
203-208.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Kettenberger,
and
P.Cramer
(2006).
Fluorescence detection of nucleic acids and proteins in multi-component crystals.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
62,
146-150.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.N.Wilson,
J.M.Harms,
K.H.Nierhaus,
F.Schlünzen,
and
P.Fucini
(2005).
Species-specific antibiotic-ribosome interactions: implications for drug development.
|
| |
Biol Chem,
386,
1239-1252.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.H.Cate
(2005).
The ins and outs of protein synthesis.
|
| |
Structure,
13,
1584-1585.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |
|