 |
PDBsum entry 2dcq
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unknown function
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
2dcq
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Am Chem Soc
128:13112-13122
(2006)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Automated protein structure determination from NMR spectra.
|
|
B.López-Méndez,
P.Güntert.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Fully automated structure determination of proteins in solution (FLYA) yields,
without human intervention, three-dimensional protein structures starting from a
set of multidimensional NMR spectra. Integrating existing and new software,
automated peak picking over all spectra is followed by peak list filtering, the
generation of an ensemble of initial chemical shift assignments, the
determination of consensus chemical shift assignments for all (1)H, (13)C, and
(15)N nuclei, the assignment of NOESY cross-peaks, the generation of distance
restraints, and the calculation of the three-dimensional structure by torsion
angle dynamics. The resulting, preliminary structure serves as additional input
to the second stage of the procedure, in which a new ensemble of chemical shift
assignments and a refined structure are calculated. The three-dimensional
structures of three 12-16 kDa proteins computed with the FLYA algorithm
coincided closely with the conventionally determined structures. Deviations were
below 0.95 A for the backbone atom positions, excluding the flexible chain
termini. 96-97% of all backbone and side-chain chemical shifts in the structured
regions were assigned to the correct residues. The purely computational FLYA
method is suitable for substituting all manual spectra analysis and thus
overcomes a main efficiency limitation of the NMR method for protein structure
determination.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
J.L.Barneto,
M.Avalos,
R.Babiano,
P.Cintas,
J.L.Jiménez,
and
J.C.Palacios
(2010).
A new model for mapping the peptide backbone: predicting proton chemical shifts in proteins.
|
| |
Org Biomol Chem,
8,
857-863.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Bahrami,
A.H.Assadi,
J.L.Markley,
and
H.R.Eghbalnia
(2009).
Probabilistic interaction network of evidence algorithm and its application to complete labeling of peak lists from protein NMR spectroscopy.
|
| |
PLoS Comput Biol,
5,
e1000307.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.I.Khayrutdinov,
W.J.Bae,
Y.M.Yun,
J.H.Lee,
T.Tsuyama,
J.J.Kim,
E.Hwang,
K.S.Ryu,
H.K.Cheong,
C.Cheong,
J.S.Ko,
T.Enomoto,
P.A.Karplus,
P.Güntert,
S.Tada,
Y.H.Jeon,
and
Y.Cho
(2009).
Structure of the Cdt1 C-terminal domain: conservation of the winged helix fold in replication licensing factors.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
18,
2252-2264.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
B.R.Donald,
and
J.Martin
(2009).
Automated NMR Assignment and Protein Structure Determination using Sparse Dipolar Coupling Constraints.
|
| |
Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc,
55,
101-127.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.C.Rogness,
and
R.C.Larock
(2009).
Rapid synthesis of the indole-indolone scaffold via [3+2] annulation of arynes by methyl indole-2-carboxylates.
|
| |
Tetrahedron Lett,
50,
4003-4008.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.P.Williamson,
and
C.J.Craven
(2009).
Automated protein structure calculation from NMR data.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR,
43,
131-143.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Güntert
(2009).
Automated structure determination from NMR spectra.
|
| |
Eur Biophys J,
38,
129-143.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Salah,
M.Bisaglia,
P.Aliprandi,
M.Uzan,
C.Sizun,
and
F.Bontems
(2009).
Probing the relationship between Gram-negative and Gram-positive S1 proteins by sequence analysis.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
37,
5578-5588.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Powers
(2009).
Advances in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance for Drug Discovery.
|
| |
Expert Opin Drug Discov,
4,
1077-1098.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Schmucki,
S.Yokoyama,
and
P.Güntert
(2009).
Automated assignment of NMR chemical shifts using peak-particle dynamics simulation with the DYNASSIGN algorithm.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR,
43,
97.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Ikeya,
M.Takeda,
H.Yoshida,
T.Terauchi,
J.G.Jee,
M.Kainosho,
and
P.Güntert
(2009).
Automated NMR structure determination of stereo-array isotope labeled ubiquitin from minimal sets of spectra using the SAIL-FLYA system.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR,
44,
261-272.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.L.Ulrich,
H.Akutsu,
J.F.Doreleijers,
Y.Harano,
Y.E.Ioannidis,
J.Lin,
M.Livny,
S.Mading,
D.Maziuk,
Z.Miller,
E.Nakatani,
C.F.Schulte,
D.E.Tolmie,
R.Kent Wenger,
H.Yao,
and
J.L.Markley
(2008).
BioMagResBank.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
36,
D402-D408.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Shin,
W.Lee,
and
W.Lee
(2008).
Structural proteomics by NMR spectroscopy.
|
| |
Expert Rev Proteomics,
5,
589-601.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Takeda,
N.Sugimori,
T.Torizawa,
T.Terauchi,
A.M.Ono,
H.Yagi,
Y.Yamaguchi,
K.Kato,
T.Ikeya,
J.Jee,
P.Güntert,
D.J.Aceti,
J.L.Markley,
and
M.Kainosho
(2008).
Structure of the putative 32 kDa myrosinase-binding protein from Arabidopsis (At3g16450.1) determined by SAIL-NMR.
|
| |
FEBS J,
275,
5873-5884.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
P.R.Markwick,
T.Malliavin,
and
M.Nilges
(2008).
Structural biology by NMR: structure, dynamics, and interactions.
|
| |
PLoS Comput Biol,
4,
e1000168.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.R.Baker,
D.N.Woolfson,
F.W.Muskett,
R.G.Stoneman,
M.D.Urbaniak,
and
S.Caddick
(2007).
Protein-small molecule interactions in neocarzinostatin, the prototypical enediyne chromoprotein antibiotic.
|
| |
Chembiochem,
8,
704-717.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Zhao,
and
R.C.Larock
(2007).
Synthesis of xanthones, thioxanthones, and acridones by the coupling of arynes and substituted benzoates.
|
| |
J Org Chem,
72,
583-588.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Takeda,
T.Ikeya,
P.Güntert,
and
M.Kainosho
(2007).
Automated structure determination of proteins with the SAIL-FLYA NMR method.
|
| |
Nat Protoc,
2,
2896-2902.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |