 |
PDBsum entry 1ry4
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cell adhesion
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1ry4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Mol Cell
13:665-676
(2004)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Cdc42 regulates the Par-6 PDZ domain through an allosteric CRIB-PDZ transition.
|
|
F.C.Peterson,
R.R.Penkert,
B.F.Volkman,
K.E.Prehoda.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Regulation of protein interaction domains is required for cellular signaling
dynamics. Here, we show that the PDZ protein interaction domain from the cell
polarity protein Par-6 is regulated by the Rho GTPase Cdc42. Cdc42 binds to a
CRIB domain adjacent to the PDZ domain, increasing the affinity of the Par-6 PDZ
for its carboxy-terminal ligand by approximately 13-fold. Par-6 PDZ regulation
is required for function as mutational disruption of Cdc42-Par-6 PDZ coupling
leads to inactivation of Par-6 in polarized MDCK epithelial cells. Structural
analysis reveals that the free PDZ domain has several deviations from the
canonical PDZ conformation that account for its low ligand affinity. Regulation
results from a Cdc42-induced conformational transition in the CRIB-PDZ module
that causes the PDZ to assume a canonical, high-affinity PDZ conformation. The
coupled CRIB and PDZ architecture of Par-6 reveals how simple binding domains
can be combined to yield complex regulation.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 5.
Figure 5. Comparison of Par-6 PDZ Domain in the Free and
Cdc42-Bound Forms(A) Ribbon overlay of the free (green) and
Cdc42 bound (orange) Par-6 PDZ domain. The root mean square
deviation (rmsd) between the free PDZ ensemble is shown compared
to the rmsd between the free ensemble and the Cdc42-bound
structure. The sequence of human Par-6B used for the crystal
structure is shown for comparison.(B) Comparison of the free and
Cdc42-bound Par-6 PDZ domains to other PDZ structures. Known PDZ
structures (black; PDB codes: 1BE9, 1G9O, 1GM1, 1I92, 1IHJ,
1KEF, 1KWA, 1PDR, 1QAU; only residues from the PDZ domains of
these structures are shown) have a tightly clustered
conformation that closely resembles the Cdc42-bound Par-6 PDZ
domain. The free Par-6 structure deviates from the canonical PDZ
fold, however. A statistical analysis of the conformational
differences between the free and Cdc42-bound Par-6 PDZ domains
and PSD-95 PDZ3 (PDB code 1BE9) is shown below the overlay.
|
 |
Figure 6.
Figure 6. Par-6 PDZ Peptide Binding Induces Conversion to
the High-Affinity Conformation(A) The free Par-6 PDZ domain
exists in a low-affinity conformation (green) that deviates from
the canonical PDZ conformation. Binding of Cdc42 or peptide
induces conversion to the high-affinity form (orange). Once one
ligand has bound, the other ligand binds with an enhanced
affinity (by a cooperativity factor, c).(B) The Drosophila Par-6
PDZ-VKESLV peptide complex structure. Electron density for the
peptide from a 2F[o] − F[c] map in which the peptide was
omitted from the calculation of the phases is shown.(C)
Comparison of the crystal structure of Par-6 in complex with
VKESLV peptide (orange) and Cdc42-bound Par-6 and PSD-95 PDZ3
(both black).(D) Structure of the peptide binding pocket. The
Par-6 PDZ domain (orange) is shown with bound peptide
(violet).(E) Spatial and temporal Par-6 regulation model. Cdc42
is lipid modified and becomes associated with the membrane when
activated, which may play a role in Par-6 localization thereby
coupling membrane translocation with activity modulation.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Mol Cell
(2004,
13,
665-676)
copyright 2004.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
R.N.McLaughlin,
F.J.Poelwijk,
A.Raman,
W.S.Gosal,
and
R.Ranganathan
(2012).
The spatial architecture of protein function and adaptation.
|
| |
Nature,
491,
138-142.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Kaufmann,
N.Shen,
L.Mizoue,
and
J.Meiler
(2011).
A physical model for PDZ-domain/peptide interactions.
|
| |
J Mol Model,
17,
315-324.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.K.Ho,
and
D.A.Agard
(2010).
Conserved tertiary couplings stabilize elements in the PDZ fold, leading to characteristic patterns of domain conformational flexibility.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
19,
398-411.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Ricketson,
C.A.Johnston,
and
K.E.Prehoda
(2010).
Multiple tail domain interactions stabilize nonmuscle myosin II bipolar filaments.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
20964-20969.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Li,
H.Kim,
D.G.Aceto,
J.Hung,
S.Aono,
and
K.J.Kemphues
(2010).
Binding to PKC-3, but not to PAR-3 or to a conventional PDZ domain ligand, is required for PAR-6 function in C. elegans.
|
| |
Dev Biol,
340,
88-98.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Q.S.Du,
C.H.Wang,
S.M.Liao,
and
R.B.Huang
(2010).
Correlation analysis for protein evolutionary family based on amino acid position mutations and application in PDZ domain.
|
| |
PLoS One,
5,
e13207.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Yang,
W.Jian,
and
W.Qin
(2010).
Molecular cloning and phylogenetic analysis of small GTPase protein Tscdc42 from Trichinella spiralis.
|
| |
Parasitol Res,
106,
801-808.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Yang,
W.Qin,
G.Tian,
and
W.Jian
(2010).
Expression and functional characterization of a Rho-family small GTPase CDC42 from Trichinella spiralis.
|
| |
Parasitol Res,
107,
153-162.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.M.Petit,
J.Zhang,
P.J.Sapienza,
E.J.Fuentes,
and
A.L.Lee
(2009).
Hidden dynamic allostery in a PDZ domain.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
106,
18249-18254.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.W.Wong,
and
C.Y.Cheng
(2009).
Polarity proteins and cell-cell interactions in the testis.
|
| |
Int Rev Cell Mol Biol,
278,
309-353.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.E.Prehoda
(2009).
Polarization of Drosophila neuroblasts during asymmetric division.
|
| |
Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol,
1,
a001388.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Halabi,
O.Rivoire,
S.Leibler,
and
R.Ranganathan
(2009).
Protein sectors: evolutionary units of three-dimensional structure.
|
| |
Cell,
138,
774-786.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.G.Smock,
and
L.M.Gierasch
(2009).
Sending signals dynamically.
|
| |
Science,
324,
198-203.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Kong,
and
M.Karplus
(2009).
Signaling pathways of PDZ2 domain: a molecular dynamics interaction correlation analysis.
|
| |
Proteins,
74,
145-154.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.N.Chi,
L.Elfström,
Y.Shi,
T.Snäll,
A.Engström,
and
P.Jemth
(2008).
Reassessing a sparse energetic network within a single protein domain.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
105,
4679-4684.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Lee,
M.Natarajan,
V.C.Nashine,
M.Socolich,
T.Vo,
W.P.Russ,
S.J.Benkovic,
and
R.Ranganathan
(2008).
Surface sites for engineering allosteric control in proteins.
|
| |
Science,
322,
438-442.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Ebnet
(2008).
Organization of multiprotein complexes at cell-cell junctions.
|
| |
Histochem Cell Biol,
130,
1.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.L.Liu,
N.Fewkes,
D.Ricketson,
R.R.Penkert,
and
K.E.Prehoda
(2008).
Filament-dependent and -independent localization modes of Drosophila non-muscle myosin II.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
380-387.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Aranda,
M.E.Nolan,
and
S.K.Muthuswamy
(2008).
Par complex in cancer: a regulator of normal cell polarity joins the dark side.
|
| |
Oncogene,
27,
6878-6887.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.W.Nipper,
K.H.Siller,
N.R.Smith,
C.Q.Doe,
and
K.E.Prehoda
(2007).
Galphai generates multiple Pins activation states to link cortical polarity and spindle orientation in Drosophila neuroblasts.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
104,
14306-14311.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.X.Atwood,
C.Chabu,
R.R.Penkert,
C.Q.Doe,
and
K.E.Prehoda
(2007).
Cdc42 acts downstream of Bazooka to regulate neuroblast polarity through Par-6 aPKC.
|
| |
J Cell Sci,
120,
3200-3206.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Giallourakis,
Z.Cao,
T.Green,
H.Wachtel,
X.Xie,
M.Lopez-Illasaca,
M.Daly,
J.Rioux,
and
R.Xavier
(2006).
A molecular-properties-based approach to understanding PDZ domain proteins and PDZ ligands.
|
| |
Genome Res,
16,
1056-1072.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.H.Siller,
C.Cabernard,
and
C.Q.Doe
(2006).
The NuMA-related Mud protein binds Pins and regulates spindle orientation in Drosophila neuroblasts.
|
| |
Nat Cell Biol,
8,
594-600.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.E.Swan,
M.Schmidt,
T.Schwarz,
E.Ponimaskin,
U.Prange,
T.Boeckers,
U.Thomas,
and
S.J.Sigrist
(2006).
Complex interaction of Drosophila GRIP PDZ domains and Echinoid during muscle morphogenesis.
|
| |
EMBO J,
25,
3640-3651.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Neduva,
and
R.B.Russell
(2006).
Peptides mediating interaction networks: new leads at last.
|
| |
Curr Opin Biotechnol,
17,
465-471.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.B.Jaffe,
and
A.Hall
(2005).
Rho GTPases: biochemistry and biology.
|
| |
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol,
21,
247-269.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Ozkan,
H.Yu,
and
J.Deisenhofer
(2005).
Mechanistic insight into the allosteric activation of a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme by RING-type ubiquitin ligases.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
102,
18890-18895.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Socolich,
S.W.Lockless,
W.P.Russ,
H.Lee,
K.H.Gardner,
and
R.Ranganathan
(2005).
Evolutionary information for specifying a protein fold.
|
| |
Nature,
437,
512-518.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
O.Roumanie,
H.Wu,
J.N.Molk,
G.Rossi,
K.Bloom,
and
P.Brennwald
(2005).
Rho GTPase regulation of exocytosis in yeast is independent of GTP hydrolysis and polarization of the exocyst complex.
|
| |
J Cell Biol,
170,
583-594.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Gao,
and
I.G.Macara
(2004).
Isoforms of the polarity protein par6 have distinct functions.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
279,
41557-41562.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Q.Wang,
T.W.Hurd,
and
B.Margolis
(2004).
Tight junction protein Par6 interacts with an evolutionarily conserved region in the amino terminus of PALS1/stardust.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
279,
30715-30721.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.R.Penkert,
H.M.DiVittorio,
and
K.E.Prehoda
(2004).
Internal recognition through PDZ domain plasticity in the Par-6-Pals1 complex.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
11,
1122-1127.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |