 |
PDBsum entry 1pd8
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxidoreductase
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1pd8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
E.C.1.5.1.3
- dihydrofolate reductase.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |

Pathway:
|
 |
Folate Coenzymes
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
(6S)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolate + NADP+ = 7,8-dihydrofolate + NADPH + H+
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
(6S)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolate
|
+
|
NADP(+)
Bound ligand (Het Group name = )
corresponds exactly
|
=
|
7,8-dihydrofolate
Bound ligand (Het Group name = )
matches with 46.34% similarity
|
+
|
NADPH
|
+
|
H(+)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Molecule diagrams generated from .mol files obtained from the
KEGG ftp site
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr
59:1603-1609
(2003)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Analysis of three crystal structure determinations of a 5-methyl-6-N-methylanilino pyridopyrimidine antifolate complex with human dihydrofolate reductase.
|
|
V.Cody,
J.R.Luft,
W.Pangborn,
A.Gangjee.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Structural data are reported for the first example of the potent antifolate
inhibitor
2,4-diamino-5-methyl-6-[(3',4',5'-trimethoxy-N-methylanilino)methyl]pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine
(1) in complex with human dihydrofolate reductase (hDHFR) and NADPH. Small
differences in crystallization conditions resulted in the growth of two
different forms of a binary complex. The structure determination of an
additional crystal of a ternary complex of hDHFR with NADPH and (1) grown under
similar conditions is also reported. Diffraction data were collected to 2.1 A
resolution for an R3 lattice from a hDHFR ternary complex with NADPH and (1) and
to 2.2 A resolution from a binary complex. Data were also collected to 2.1 A
resolution from a binary complex with hDHFR and (1) in the first example of a
tetragonal P4(3)2(1)2 lattice. Comparison of the intermolecular contacts among
these structures reveals differences in the backbone conformation (1.9-3.2 A)
for flexible loop regions (residues 40-46, 77-83 and 103-107) that reflect
differences in the packing environment between the rhombohedral and tetragonal
space groups. Analysis of the packing environments shows that the tetragonal
lattice is more tightly packed, as reflected in its smaller V(M) value and lower
solvent content. The conformation of the inhibitor (1) is similar in all
structures and is also similar to that observed for TMQ, the parent quinazoline
compound. The activity profile for this series of 5-deaza N-substituted
non-classical trimethoxybenzyl antifolates shows that the N10-CH(3) substituted
(1) has the greatest potency and selectivity for Toxoplasma gondii DHFR (tgDHFR)
compared with its N-H or N-CHO analogs. Models of the tgDHFR active site
indicate preferential contacts with (1) that are not present in either the human
or Pneumocystis carinii DHFR structures. Differences in the acidic residue
(Glu30 versus Asp for tgDHFR) affect the precise positioning of the
diaminopyridopyrimidine ring, while changes in other residues, particularly at
positions 60 and 64 (Leu versus Met and Asn versus Phe), involve interactions
with the trimethoxybenzyl substituents.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1 Schematic representation of trimethoprim (TMP),
trimetrexate (TMQ) and its pyridopyrimidine N10-substituted
analogs.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4 Comparison of active-site binding region of hDHFR with
NADPH and antifolate (1) for the R3 lattice (cyan) and for the
P4[3]2[1]2 lattice (yellow). Also shown is F31A hDHFR-TMQ
(violet). Models were produced with SETOR (Evans, 1993[Evans, S.
V. (1993). J. Mol. Graph. 11, 134-138.]).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the IUCr:
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr
(2003,
59,
1603-1609)
copyright 2003.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by the author.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
A.Gangjee,
N.Zaware,
S.Raghavan,
M.Ihnat,
S.Shenoy,
and
R.L.Kisliuk
(2010).
Single agents with designed combination chemotherapy potential: synthesis and evaluation of substituted pyrimido[4,5-b]indoles as receptor tyrosine kinase and thymidylate synthase inhibitors and as antitumor agents.
|
| |
J Med Chem,
53,
1563-1578.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Gangjee,
W.Li,
L.Lin,
Y.Zeng,
M.Ihnat,
L.A.Warnke,
D.W.Green,
V.Cody,
J.Pace,
and
S.F.Queener
(2009).
Design, synthesis, and X-ray crystal structures of 2,4-diaminofuro[2,3-d]pyrimidines as multireceptor tyrosine kinase and dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors.
|
| |
Bioorg Med Chem,
17,
7324-7336.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.P.Volpato,
B.J.Yachnin,
J.Blanchet,
V.Guerrero,
L.Poulin,
E.Fossati,
A.M.Berghuis,
and
J.N.Pelletier
(2009).
Multiple conformers in active site of human dihydrofolate reductase F31R/Q35E double mutant suggest structural basis for methotrexate resistance.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
20079-20089.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
E.S.Bolstad,
and
A.C.Anderson
(2008).
In pursuit of virtual lead optimization: the role of the receptor structure and ensembles in accurate docking.
|
| |
Proteins,
73,
566-580.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Gangjee,
Y.Zeng,
M.Ihnat,
L.A.Warnke,
D.W.Green,
R.L.Kisliuk,
and
F.T.Lin
(2005).
Novel 5-substituted, 2,4-diaminofuro[2,3-d]pyrimidines as multireceptor tyrosine kinase and dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors with antiangiogenic and antitumor activity.
|
| |
Bioorg Med Chem,
13,
5475-5491.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.V.Kovalevskaya,
Y.D.Smurnyy,
V.I.Polshakov,
B.Birdsall,
A.F.Bradbury,
T.Frenkiel,
and
J.Feeney
(2005).
Solution structure of human dihydrofolate reductase in its complex with trimethoprim and NADPH.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR,
33,
69-72.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |