spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 1mnf

Go to PDB code: 
protein Protein-protein interface(s) links
Chaperone PDB id
1mnf

 

 

 

 

Loading ...

 
JSmol PyMol  
Contents
Protein chains
(+ 8 more) 525 a.a. *
(+ 8 more) 12 a.a. *
Waters ×213
* Residue conservation analysis
PDB id:
1mnf
Name: Chaperone
Title: Domain motions in groel upon binding of an oligopeptide
Structure: Groel protein. Chain: a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n. Synonym: protein cpn60, groel protein, ams. Engineered: yes. 12-residue peptide substrate. Chain: o, p, q, r, s, t, u, v, w, x, y, z, 1, 2. Synonym: sbp, strong binding peptide. Engineered: yes
Source: Escherichia coli. Organism_taxid: 562. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562. Synthetic: yes. Other_details: the peptide was chemically synthesized.
Biol. unit: 28mer (from PQS)
Resolution:
3.00Å     R-factor:   0.236     R-free:   0.259
Authors: J.Wang,L.Chen
Key ref:
J.Wang and L.Chen (2003). Domain motions in GroEL upon binding of an oligopeptide. J Mol Biol, 334, 489-499. PubMed id: 14623189 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.09.074
Date:
02-Dec-03     Release date:   07-Oct-03    
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers
 References

Protein chains
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
P0A6F5  (CH60_ECOLI) -  Chaperonin GroEL from Escherichia coli (strain K12)
Seq:
Struc:
 
Seq:
Struc:
548 a.a.
525 a.a.
Protein chains
No UniProt id for this chain
Struc: 12 a.a.
Key:    PfamA domain  Secondary structure  CATH domain

 Enzyme reactions 
   Enzyme class: Chains A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N: E.C.5.6.1.7  - chaperonin ATPase.
[IntEnz]   [ExPASy]   [KEGG]   [BRENDA]
      Reaction: ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide = ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
ATP
+ H2O
+ folded polypeptide
= ADP
+ phosphate
+ unfolded polypeptide
Molecule diagrams generated from .mol files obtained from the KEGG ftp site

 

 
    reference    
 
 
DOI no: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.09.074 J Mol Biol 334:489-499 (2003)
PubMed id: 14623189  
 
 
Domain motions in GroEL upon binding of an oligopeptide.
J.Wang, L.Chen.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
GroEL assists protein folding by preventing the interaction of partially folded molecules with other non-native proteins. It binds them, sequesters them, and then releases them so that they can fold in an ATP-driven cycle. Previous studies have also shown that protein substrates, GroES, and oligopeptides bind to partially overlapped sites on the apical domain surfaces of GroEL. In this study, we have determined the crystal structure at 3.0A resolution of a symmetric (GroEL-peptide)(14) complex. The binding of each of these small 12 amino acid residue peptides to GroEL involves interactions between three adjacent apical domains of GroEL. Each peptide interacts primarily with a single GroEL subunit. Residues R231 and R268 from adjacent subunits isolate each substrate-binding pocket, and prevent bound substrates from sliding into adjacent binding pockets. As a consequence of peptide binding, domains rotate and inter-domain interactions are greatly enhanced. The direction of rotation of the apical domain of each GroEL subunit is opposite to that of its intermediate domain. Viewed from outside, the apical domains rotate clockwise within one GroEL ring, while the ATP-induced apical domain rotation is counter-clockwise.
 
  Selected figure(s)  
 
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Peptide-induced domain rotations. A, Subunit comparison in a view approximately perpendicular to the 7-fold axis. B, View along the 7-fold axis. All subunits are superimposed using equatorial domains (cyan). Subunits in the apo structure[33.] are in cyan. Domains of subunits in this structure are green and red for the intermediate and apical domains, respectively. Red and green arrows indicate the rotations of the apical and intermediate domains in this structure.
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Peptide-induced domain rotations are distinct from ATP-induced ones. A, View nearly perpendicular to the 7-fold axis. B, View along the 7-fold axis. Averaged coordinates are used for the apo structure[33.] (cyan), the KMgATP bound structure [30.] (silver), and this complex structure (apical domain, red; intermediate domain, green; and equatorial domain, cyan) with the bound peptide in yellow. Arrows indicate the rotations of both intermediate and apical domains upon binding of ATP.
 
  The above figures are reprinted by permission from Elsevier: J Mol Biol (2003, 334, 489-499) copyright 2003.  
  Figures were selected by an automated process.  

Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference

  PubMed id Reference
20814869 Y.Li, Z.Zheng, A.Ramsey, and L.Chen (2010).
Analysis of peptides and proteins in their binding to GroEL.
  J Pept Sci, 16, 693-700.  
19156839 J.Reumers, S.Maurer-Stroh, J.Schymkowitz, and F.Rousseau (2009).
Protein sequences encode safeguards against aggregation.
  Hum Mutat, 30, 431-437.  
19074438 Y.Li, X.Gao, and L.Chen (2009).
GroEL Recognizes an Amphipathic Helix and Binds to the Hydrophobic Side.
  J Biol Chem, 284, 4324-4331.  
18647240 N.D.Thomsen, and J.M.Berger (2008).
Structural frameworks for considering microbial protein- and nucleic acid-dependent motor ATPases.
  Mol Microbiol, 69, 1071-1090.  
17456746 E.van Duijn, A.J.Heck, and S.M.van der Vies (2007).
Inter-ring communication allows the GroEL chaperonin complex to distinguish between different substrates.
  Protein Sci, 16, 956-965.  
16754671 B.W.Ying, H.Taguchi, and T.Ueda (2006).
Co-translational binding of GroEL to nascent polypeptides is followed by post-translational encapsulation by GroES to mediate protein folding.
  J Biol Chem, 281, 21813-21819.  
16943448 F.Tama, G.Ren, C.L.Brooks, and A.K.Mitra (2006).
Model of the toxic complex of anthrax: responsive conformational changes in both the lethal factor and the protective antigen heptamer.
  Protein Sci, 15, 2190-2200.  
16452612 H.Fan, and A.E.Mark (2006).
Mimicking the action of GroEL in molecular dynamics simulations: application to the refinement of protein structures.
  Protein Sci, 15, 441-448.  
16820437 R.Di Cagno, M.De Angelis, A.Limitone, P.F.Fox, and M.Gobbetti (2006).
Response of Lactobacillus helveticus PR4 to heat stress during propagation in cheese whey with a gradient of decreasing temperatures.
  Appl Environ Microbiol, 72, 4503-4514.  
15466535 C.Desmond, G.F.Fitzgerald, C.Stanton, and R.P.Ross (2004).
Improved stress tolerance of GroESL-overproducing Lactococcus lactis and probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei NFBC 338.
  Appl Environ Microbiol, 70, 5929-5936.  
14734563 M.Taniguchi, T.Yoshimi, K.Hongo, T.Mizobata, and Y.Kawata (2004).
Stopped-flow fluorescence analysis of the conformational changes in the GroEL apical domain: relationships between movements in the apical domain and the quaternary structure of GroEL.
  J Biol Chem, 279, 16368-16376.  
15296740 T.Shimamura, A.Koike-Takeshita, K.Yokoyama, R.Masui, N.Murai, M.Yoshida, H.Taguchi, and S.Iwata (2004).
Crystal structure of the native chaperonin complex from Thermus thermophilus revealed unexpected asymmetry at the cis-cavity.
  Structure, 12, 1471-1480.
PDB codes: 1we3 1wf4
The most recent references are shown first. Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be only a partial list as not all journals are covered by either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data so more and more references will be included with time. Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB codes are shown on the right.

 

spacer

spacer