|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(+ 8 more)
525 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(+ 8 more)
12 a.a.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Chaperone
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Domain motions in groel upon binding of an oligopeptide
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Groel protein. Chain: a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n. Synonym: protein cpn60, groel protein, ams. Engineered: yes. 12-residue peptide substrate. Chain: o, p, q, r, s, t, u, v, w, x, y, z, 1, 2. Synonym: sbp, strong binding peptide. Engineered: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Escherichia coli. Organism_taxid: 562. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562. Synthetic: yes. Other_details: the peptide was chemically synthesized.
|
|
Biol. unit:
|
 |
28mer (from
)
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
3.00Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.236
|
R-free:
|
0.259
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
J.Wang,L.Chen
|
Key ref:
|
 |
J.Wang
and
L.Chen
(2003).
Domain motions in GroEL upon binding of an oligopeptide.
J Mol Biol,
334,
489-499.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
02-Dec-03
|
Release date:
|
07-Oct-03
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
Chains A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N:
E.C.5.6.1.7
- chaperonin ATPase.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide = ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
ATP
|
+
|
H2O
|
+
|
folded polypeptide
|
=
|
ADP
|
+
|
phosphate
|
+
|
unfolded polypeptide
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Molecule diagrams generated from .mol files obtained from the
KEGG ftp site
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
334:489-499
(2003)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Domain motions in GroEL upon binding of an oligopeptide.
|
|
J.Wang,
L.Chen.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
GroEL assists protein folding by preventing the interaction of partially folded
molecules with other non-native proteins. It binds them, sequesters them, and
then releases them so that they can fold in an ATP-driven cycle. Previous
studies have also shown that protein substrates, GroES, and oligopeptides bind
to partially overlapped sites on the apical domain surfaces of GroEL. In this
study, we have determined the crystal structure at 3.0A resolution of a
symmetric (GroEL-peptide)(14) complex. The binding of each of these small 12
amino acid residue peptides to GroEL involves interactions between three
adjacent apical domains of GroEL. Each peptide interacts primarily with a single
GroEL subunit. Residues R231 and R268 from adjacent subunits isolate each
substrate-binding pocket, and prevent bound substrates from sliding into
adjacent binding pockets. As a consequence of peptide binding, domains rotate
and inter-domain interactions are greatly enhanced. The direction of rotation of
the apical domain of each GroEL subunit is opposite to that of its intermediate
domain. Viewed from outside, the apical domains rotate clockwise within one
GroEL ring, while the ATP-induced apical domain rotation is counter-clockwise.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Peptide-induced domain rotations. A, Subunit
comparison in a view approximately perpendicular to the 7-fold
axis. B, View along the 7-fold axis. All subunits are
superimposed using equatorial domains (cyan). Subunits in the
apo structure[33.] are in cyan. Domains of subunits in this
structure are green and red for the intermediate and apical
domains, respectively. Red and green arrows indicate the
rotations of the apical and intermediate domains in this
structure.
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Peptide-induced domain rotations are distinct
from ATP-induced ones. A, View nearly perpendicular to the
7-fold axis. B, View along the 7-fold axis. Averaged coordinates
are used for the apo structure[33.] (cyan), the KMgATP bound
structure [30.] (silver), and this complex structure (apical
domain, red; intermediate domain, green; and equatorial domain,
cyan) with the bound peptide in yellow. Arrows indicate the
rotations of both intermediate and apical domains upon binding
of ATP.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2003,
334,
489-499)
copyright 2003.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
Y.Li,
Z.Zheng,
A.Ramsey,
and
L.Chen
(2010).
Analysis of peptides and proteins in their binding to GroEL.
|
| |
J Pept Sci,
16,
693-700.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Reumers,
S.Maurer-Stroh,
J.Schymkowitz,
and
F.Rousseau
(2009).
Protein sequences encode safeguards against aggregation.
|
| |
Hum Mutat,
30,
431-437.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Li,
X.Gao,
and
L.Chen
(2009).
GroEL Recognizes an Amphipathic Helix and Binds to the Hydrophobic Side.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
4324-4331.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.D.Thomsen,
and
J.M.Berger
(2008).
Structural frameworks for considering microbial protein- and nucleic acid-dependent motor ATPases.
|
| |
Mol Microbiol,
69,
1071-1090.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.van Duijn,
A.J.Heck,
and
S.M.van der Vies
(2007).
Inter-ring communication allows the GroEL chaperonin complex to distinguish between different substrates.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
16,
956-965.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.W.Ying,
H.Taguchi,
and
T.Ueda
(2006).
Co-translational binding of GroEL to nascent polypeptides is followed by post-translational encapsulation by GroES to mediate protein folding.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
281,
21813-21819.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Tama,
G.Ren,
C.L.Brooks,
and
A.K.Mitra
(2006).
Model of the toxic complex of anthrax: responsive conformational changes in both the lethal factor and the protective antigen heptamer.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
15,
2190-2200.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Fan,
and
A.E.Mark
(2006).
Mimicking the action of GroEL in molecular dynamics simulations: application to the refinement of protein structures.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
15,
441-448.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Di Cagno,
M.De Angelis,
A.Limitone,
P.F.Fox,
and
M.Gobbetti
(2006).
Response of Lactobacillus helveticus PR4 to heat stress during propagation in cheese whey with a gradient of decreasing temperatures.
|
| |
Appl Environ Microbiol,
72,
4503-4514.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Desmond,
G.F.Fitzgerald,
C.Stanton,
and
R.P.Ross
(2004).
Improved stress tolerance of GroESL-overproducing Lactococcus lactis and probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei NFBC 338.
|
| |
Appl Environ Microbiol,
70,
5929-5936.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Taniguchi,
T.Yoshimi,
K.Hongo,
T.Mizobata,
and
Y.Kawata
(2004).
Stopped-flow fluorescence analysis of the conformational changes in the GroEL apical domain: relationships between movements in the apical domain and the quaternary structure of GroEL.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
279,
16368-16376.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Shimamura,
A.Koike-Takeshita,
K.Yokoyama,
R.Masui,
N.Murai,
M.Yoshida,
H.Taguchi,
and
S.Iwata
(2004).
Crystal structure of the native chaperonin complex from Thermus thermophilus revealed unexpected asymmetry at the cis-cavity.
|
| |
Structure,
12,
1471-1480.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |