 |
PDBsum entry 1lum
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Transferase
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Nmr structure of the itk sh2 domain, pro287trans, 20 low energy structures
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Tyrosine-protein kinase itk/tsk. Chain: a. Fragment: src homology 2 (sh2) domain (residues 238-344). Synonym: interleukin-2 tyrosine kinase, t-cell-specific kinase, il-2- inducible t-cell kinase, kinase emt, kinase tlk. Engineered: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Mus musculus. House mouse. Organism_taxid: 10090. Expressed in: escherichia coli bl21. Expression_system_taxid: 511693.
|
|
NMR struc:
|
 |
20 models
|
 |
|
Authors:
|
 |
R.J.Mallis,K.N.Brazin,D.B.Fulton,A.H.Andreotti
|
Key ref:
|
 |
R.J.Mallis
et al.
(2002).
Structural characterization of a proline-driven conformational switch within the Itk SH2 domain.
Nat Struct Biol,
9,
900-905.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
22-May-02
|
Release date:
|
27-Nov-02
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q03526
(ITK_MOUSE) -
Tyrosine-protein kinase ITK/TSK from Mus musculus
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
625 a.a.
109 a.a.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
 |
CATH domain |
 |
|
*
PDB and UniProt seqs differ
at 2 residue positions (black
crosses)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
E.C.2.7.10.2
- non-specific protein-tyrosine kinase.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
L-tyrosyl-[protein] + ATP = O-phospho-L-tyrosyl-[protein] + ADP + H+
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
L-tyrosyl-[protein]
|
+
|
ATP
|
=
|
O-phospho-L-tyrosyl-[protein]
|
+
|
ADP
|
+
|
H(+)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Molecule diagrams generated from .mol files obtained from the
KEGG ftp site
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Nat Struct Biol
9:900-905
(2002)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structural characterization of a proline-driven conformational switch within the Itk SH2 domain.
|
|
R.J.Mallis,
K.N.Brazin,
D.B.Fulton,
A.H.Andreotti.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Interleukin-2 tyrosine kinase (Itk) is a T cell-specific kinase required for a
proper immune response following T cell receptor engagement. In addition to the
kinase domain, Itk is composed of several noncatalytic regulatory domains,
including a Src homology 2 (SH2) domain that contains a conformationally
heterogeneous Pro residue. Cis-trans isomerization of a single prolyl imide bond
within the SH2 domain mediates conformer-specific ligand recognition that may
have functional implications in T cell signaling. To better understand the
mechanism by which a proline switch regulates ligand binding, we have used NMR
spectroscopy to determine two structures of Itk SH2 corresponding to the cis and
trans imide bond-containing conformers. The structures indicate that the
heterogeneous Pro residue acts as a hinge that modulates ligand recognition by
controlling the relative orientation of protein-binding surfaces.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. NMR structures of the cis and trans Itk SH2
conformers. a, Stereo view of 20 low energy structures of the
cis (coral) and trans (turquoise) conformations of the Itk SH2
domain. Backbone heavy atoms within the secondary structural
elements over the entire sequence were used for superpositions.
b, Ribbon diagrams of the energy minimized average structures of
the cis (left) and trans (right) conformers. Secondary
structural elements and ligand-binding pockets are labeled in
(a,b) according to standard nomenclature for SH2 domains8. Pro
287 is labeled in each structure. c, Sequence of the Itk SH2
domain and sequence alignment of the CD loop regions in the SH2
domains of several tyrosine kinases. The residues that give rise
to nondegenerate chemical shifts2 are bold and underlined, and
Pro 287 is labeled. d, Solvent-accessible surface plot of the
cis conformer. The residues that give rise to dual resonances
because of Pro cis-trans isomerization are highlighted in white.
The trans conformer shows a similar contiguous surface for the
heterogeneous residues (data not shown). e, Overlay of the
energy minimized average structures of the cis (coral) and trans
(turquoise) conformers. Expanded views of the CD loop (left),
the central -sheet
(right) and the BG loop regions (middle) are shown. All
structures are rendered using MolMol31.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Hydrophobic packing involving residues in the CD loop
of the cis SH2 structure provides stabilization energy. a,
Overlay of 20 lowest energy structures including the CD loop,
the central -sheet
and A
of the cis (left) and trans (right) conformers. Side chains of
Leu 254 and Pro 287 are yellow. His 291 and Glu 250 are also
labeled. b, Overlay of 20 lowest energy structures (rotated
clockwise with respect to (a)) showing the CD loop of the cis
(left) and trans (right) conformers. Side chains of Ile 282, Ala
281 and Cys 288 are labeled and shown in yellow. Additional side
chains are included without labels for clarity. c,
Three-dimensional 13C-edited NOESY experiment showing
through-space proximity between the -methyl
protons of Ile 282 and one of the -methylene
protons of Cys 288. The NOE is observed only for the cis
conformer (left panel). The total number of NOEs unique to the
cis and trans structures is shown in Table 1. d,
Three-dimensional 15N-edited TOCSY experiment illustrating the
nondegenerate resonance frequencies for the Cys 288 -methylenes
in the cis conformer (left). The same protons resonate at a
single frequency in the trans conformer (right). e, Expansion of
the 1H-15N HSQC spectra showing the amide signal of Gly 260
(6260) in the cis and trans forms. Left, unmodified, reduced Itk
SH2 domain. Middle, spectrum acquired following reaction of the
Itk SH2 domain with glutathione disulfide (GSSG) (20 mM GSSG, pH
7.4, 40 min, 25 °C). Right, spectrum acquired following reaction
with methyl methane thiosulfonate (MMTS) (5 mM MMTS, pH 7.4, 20
min). The percentage of SH2 domain in the cis conformation in
each of these experiments as measured by peak volumes of Gly 260
(cis) and Gly 260 (trans) was 48, 5 and 32% for the reduced,
GSSG-treated and MMTS-treated proteins, respectively. The
backbone amide resonance of Cys 288 was monitored over the
course of both reactions and the reactions were allowed to
proceed until no further chemical shift changes occurred. The
completeness of the S-glutathiolation reaction was also assessed
by separation of the domain with nondenaturing isoelectric
focusing (IEF) gel electrophoresis over a pH range of 3.5 -10 as
described^33.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
Nat Struct Biol
(2002,
9,
900-905)
copyright 2002.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
L.K.Nicholson,
and
S.De
(2011).
Structural biology: The twist in Crk signaling revealed.
|
| |
Nat Chem Biol,
7,
5-6.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Sarkar,
T.Saleh,
S.R.Tzeng,
R.B.Birge,
and
C.G.Kalodimos
(2011).
Structural basis for regulation of the Crk signaling protein by a proline switch.
|
| |
Nat Chem Biol,
7,
51-57.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Kaneko,
S.S.Sidhu,
and
S.S.Li
(2011).
Evolving specificity from variability for protein interaction domains.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci,
36,
183-190.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Min,
W.Wu,
R.E.Joseph,
D.B.Fulton,
L.Berg,
and
A.H.Andreotti
(2010).
Disrupting the intermolecular self-association of Itk enhances T cell signaling.
|
| |
J Immunol,
184,
4228-4235.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Severin,
R.E.Joseph,
S.Boyken,
D.B.Fulton,
and
A.H.Andreotti
(2009).
Proline isomerization preorganizes the Itk SH2 domain for binding to the Itk SH3 domain.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
387,
726-743.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Hamelberg,
and
J.A.McCammon
(2009).
Mechanistic insight into the role of transition-state stabilization in cyclophilin A.
|
| |
J Am Chem Soc,
131,
147-152.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Teilum,
J.G.Olsen,
and
B.B.Kragelund
(2009).
Functional aspects of protein flexibility.
|
| |
Cell Mol Life Sci,
66,
2231-2247.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.R.Evans,
and
K.H.Gardner
(2009).
Slow transition between two beta-strand registers is dictated by protein unfolding.
|
| |
J Am Chem Soc,
131,
11306-11307.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Sahu,
and
A.August
(2009).
ITK inhibitors in inflammation and immune-mediated disorders.
|
| |
Curr Top Med Chem,
9,
690-703.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.E.Joseph,
and
A.H.Andreotti
(2009).
Conformational snapshots of Tec kinases during signaling.
|
| |
Immunol Rev,
228,
74-92.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.P.Jakob,
G.Zoldák,
T.Aumüller,
and
F.X.Schmid
(2009).
Chaperone domains convert prolyl isomerases into generic catalysts of protein folding.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
106,
20282-20287.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
U.Weininger,
R.P.Jakob,
B.Eckert,
K.Schweimer,
F.X.Schmid,
and
J.Balbach
(2009).
A remote prolyl isomerization controls domain assembly via a hydrogen bonding network.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
106,
12335-12340.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.F.Li,
S.Poole,
K.Nishio,
K.Jang,
F.Rasulova,
A.McVeigh,
S.J.Savarino,
D.Xia,
and
E.Bullitt
(2009).
Structure of CFA/I fimbriae from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
106,
10793-10798.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.M.Carlson,
Z.L.Brumme,
C.M.Rousseau,
C.J.Brumme,
P.Matthews,
C.Kadie,
J.I.Mullins,
B.D.Walker,
P.R.Harrigan,
P.J.Goulder,
and
D.Heckerman
(2008).
Phylogenetic dependency networks: inferring patterns of CTL escape and codon covariation in HIV-1 Gag.
|
| |
PLoS Comput Biol,
4,
e1000225.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Isakov
(2008).
A new twist to adaptor proteins contributes to regulation of lymphocyte cell signaling.
|
| |
Trends Immunol,
29,
388-396.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Glaves,
M.Baer,
E.Schreiner,
R.Stoll,
and
D.Marx
(2008).
Conformational dynamics of minimal elastin-like polypeptides: the role of proline revealed by molecular dynamics and nuclear magnetic resonance.
|
| |
Chemphyschem,
9,
2759-2765.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.K.Mishra,
L.Gangwani,
R.J.Davis,
and
D.G.Lambright
(2007).
Structural insights into the interaction of the evolutionarily conserved ZPR1 domain tandem with eukaryotic EF1A, receptors, and SMN complexes.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
104,
13930-13935.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
K.P.Lu,
G.Finn,
T.H.Lee,
and
L.K.Nicholson
(2007).
Prolyl cis-trans isomerization as a molecular timer.
|
| |
Nat Chem Biol,
3,
619-629.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.E.Joseph,
D.B.Fulton,
and
A.H.Andreotti
(2007).
Mechanism and functional significance of Itk autophosphorylation.
|
| |
J Mol Biol,
373,
1281-1292.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.H.Andreotti
(2006).
Opening the pore hinges on proline.
|
| |
Nat Chem Biol,
2,
13-14.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.W.Yu,
M.D.Allen,
A.Andreeva,
A.R.Fersht,
and
M.Bycroft
(2006).
Solution structure of the C4 zinc finger domain of HDM2.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
15,
384-389.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
K.C.Huang,
H.T.Cheng,
M.T.Pai,
S.R.Tzeng,
and
J.W.Cheng
(2006).
Solution structure and phosphopeptide binding of the SH2 domain from the human Bruton's tyrosine kinase.
|
| |
J Biomol NMR,
36,
73-78.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Vogel,
B.Bukau,
and
M.P.Mayer
(2006).
Allosteric regulation of Hsp70 chaperones by a proline switch.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
21,
359-367.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.R.Jahn,
M.J.Parker,
S.W.Homans,
and
S.E.Radford
(2006).
Amyloid formation under physiological conditions proceeds via a native-like folding intermediate.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
13,
195-201.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Z.Keckesova,
L.M.Ylinen,
and
G.J.Towers
(2006).
Cyclophilin A renders human immunodeficiency virus type 1 sensitive to Old World monkey but not human TRIM5 alpha antiviral activity.
|
| |
J Virol,
80,
4683-4690.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Eckert,
A.Martin,
J.Balbach,
and
F.X.Schmid
(2005).
Prolyl isomerization as a molecular timer in phage infection.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
12,
619-623.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.J.Berg,
L.D.Finkelstein,
J.A.Lucas,
and
P.L.Schwartzberg
(2005).
Tec family kinases in T lymphocyte development and function.
|
| |
Annu Rev Immunol,
23,
549-600.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Arévalo-Rodríguez,
and
J.Heitman
(2005).
Cyclophilin A is localized to the nucleus and controls meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
|
| |
Eukaryot Cell,
4,
17-29.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Wang,
and
J.Heitman
(2005).
The cyclophilins.
|
| |
Genome Biol,
6,
226.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Lorenzen,
B.Peters,
A.Goede,
R.Preissner,
and
C.Frömmel
(2005).
Conservation of cis prolyl bonds in proteins during evolution.
|
| |
Proteins,
58,
589-595.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.M.Santiveri,
J.M.Pérez-Cañadillas,
M.K.Vadivelu,
M.D.Allen,
T.J.Rutherford,
N.A.Watkins,
and
M.Bycroft
(2004).
NMR structure of the alpha-hemoglobin stabilizing protein: insights into conformational heterogeneity and binding.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
279,
34963-34970.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Colgan,
M.Asmal,
M.Neagu,
B.Yu,
J.Schneidkraut,
Y.Lee,
E.Sokolskaja,
A.Andreotti,
and
J.Luban
(2004).
Cyclophilin A regulates TCR signal strength in CD4+ T cells via a proline-directed conformational switch in Itk.
|
| |
Immunity,
21,
189-201.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.J.Scharf,
J.Witney,
R.Daly,
and
B.A.Lyons
(2004).
Solution structure of the human Grb14-SH2 domain and comparison with the structures of the human Grb7-SH2/erbB2 peptide complex and human Grb10-SH2 domain.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
13,
2541-2546.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Suzuki,
M.Haruki,
K.Takano,
M.Morikawa,
and
S.Kanaya
(2004).
Possible involvement of an FKBP family member protein from a psychrotrophic bacterium Shewanella sp. SIB1 in cold-adaptation.
|
| |
Eur J Biochem,
271,
1372-1381.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Velyvis,
J.Vaynberg,
Y.Yang,
O.Vinogradova,
Y.Zhang,
C.Wu,
and
J.Qin
(2003).
Structural and functional insights into PINCH LIM4 domain-mediated integrin signaling.
|
| |
Nat Struct Biol,
10,
558-564.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.H.Wang,
and
M.J.Eck
(2003).
Assembling atomic resolution views of the immunological synapse.
|
| |
Curr Opin Immunol,
15,
286-293.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
X.Wang,
H.Tachikawa,
X.Yi,
K.M.Manoj,
and
L.P.Hager
(2003).
Two-dimensional NMR study of the heme active site structure of chloroperoxidase.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
278,
7765-7774.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |