spacer
spacer

PDBsum entry 1la1

Go to PDB code: 
protein links
Chaperone PDB id
1la1

 

 

 

 

Loading ...

 
JSmol PyMol  
Contents
Protein chain
192 a.a. *
Waters ×274
* Residue conservation analysis
PDB id:
1la1
Name: Chaperone
Title: Gro-el fragment (apical domain) comprising residues 188-379
Structure: Groel. Chain: a. Fragment: apical domain. Synonym: chaperone hsp60, peptide-dependent atpase, heat shock protein. Engineered: yes
Source: Escherichia coli. Organism_taxid: 562. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562
Resolution:
2.06Å     R-factor:   0.197     R-free:   0.257
Authors: A.E.Ashcroft,A.Brinker,J.E.Coyle,F.Weber,M.Kaiser,L.Moroder, M.R.Parsons,J.Jager,U.F.Hartl,M.Hayer-Hartl,S.E.Radford
Key ref:
A.E.Ashcroft et al. (2002). Structural plasticity and noncovalent substrate binding in the GroEL apical domain. A study using electrospay ionization mass spectrometry and fluorescence binding studies. J Biol Chem, 277, 33115-33126. PubMed id: 12065585 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M203398200
Date:
27-Mar-02     Release date:   03-Apr-02    
PROCHECK
Go to PROCHECK summary
 Headers
 References

Protein chain
Pfam   ArchSchema ?
P0A6F5  (CH60_ECOLI) -  Chaperonin GroEL from Escherichia coli (strain K12)
Seq:
Struc:
 
Seq:
Struc:
548 a.a.
192 a.a.
Key:    PfamA domain  Secondary structure  CATH domain

 Enzyme reactions 
   Enzyme class: E.C.5.6.1.7  - chaperonin ATPase.
[IntEnz]   [ExPASy]   [KEGG]   [BRENDA]
      Reaction: ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide = ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
ATP
+ H2O
+ folded polypeptide
= ADP
+ phosphate
+ unfolded polypeptide
Molecule diagrams generated from .mol files obtained from the KEGG ftp site

 

 
    reference    
 
 
DOI no: 10.1074/jbc.M203398200 J Biol Chem 277:33115-33126 (2002)
PubMed id: 12065585  
 
 
Structural plasticity and noncovalent substrate binding in the GroEL apical domain. A study using electrospay ionization mass spectrometry and fluorescence binding studies.
A.E.Ashcroft, A.Brinker, J.E.Coyle, F.Weber, M.Kaiser, L.Moroder, M.R.Parsons, J.Jager, U.F.Hartl, M.Hayer-Hartl, S.E.Radford.
 
  ABSTRACT  
 
Advances in understanding how GroEL binds to non-native proteins are reported. Conformational flexibility in the GroEL apical domain, which could account for the variety of substrates that GroEL binds, is illustrated by comparison of several independent crystallographic structures of apical domain constructs that show conformational plasticity in helices H and I. Additionally, ESI-MS indicates that apical domain constructs have co-populated conformations at neutral pH. To assess the ability of different apical domain conformers to bind co-chaperone and substrate, model peptides corresponding to the mobile loop of GroES and to helix D from rhodanese were studied. Analysis of apical domain-peptide complexes by ESI-MS indicates that only the folded or partially folded apical domain conformations form complexes that survive gas phase conditions. Fluorescence binding studies show that the apical domain can fully bind both peptides independently. No competition for binding was observed, suggesting the peptides have distinct apical domain-binding sites. Blocking the GroES-apical domain-binding site in GroEL rendered the chaperonin inactive in binding GroES and in assisting the folding of denatured rhodanese, but still capable of binding non-native proteins, supporting the conclusion that GroES and substrate proteins have, at least partially, distinct binding sites even in the intact GroEL tetradecamer.
 
  Selected figure(s)  
 
Figure 1.
Fig. 1. Apical domain constructs of GroEL. A, GroEL apical domain constructs indicating the amino acid residues included and modifications made in the proteins expressed for these studies. B, ribbon diagram showing a comparison of the overall structures of five independent GroEL apical domains: C-His ApEL (determined here) ( purple), N-His ApEL (22) (red), ApEL-(191-336)·peptide complex (19) (yellow), intact WT GroEL (9) (blue), and a GroEL·ADP complex (45) (green). The diagram shows the conformational flexibility in the region around helices H and I. C, r.m.s. deviation plot showing the differences in C- positions between C-His ApEL and N-His ApEL (22) (unbroken line), and C-His ApEL and an ApEL-(191-336)·peptide complex (19) (dotted line).
 
  The above figure is reprinted by permission from the ASBMB: J Biol Chem (2002, 277, 33115-33126) copyright 2002.  
  Figure was selected by the author.  

Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference

  PubMed id Reference
20814869 Y.Li, Z.Zheng, A.Ramsey, and L.Chen (2010).
Analysis of peptides and proteins in their binding to GroEL.
  J Pept Sci, 16, 693-700.  
19321422 T.L.Tapley, J.L.Körner, M.T.Barge, J.Hupfeld, J.A.Schauerte, A.Gafni, U.Jakob, and J.C.Bardwell (2009).
Structural plasticity of an acid-activated chaperone allows promiscuous substrate binding.
  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106, 5557-5562.  
18800165 Y.Yoshiike, R.Minai, Y.Matsuo, Y.R.Chen, T.Kimura, and A.Takashima (2008).
Amyloid oligomer conformation in a group of natively folded proteins.
  PLoS ONE, 3, e3235.  
17964800 D.P.Smith, K.Giles, R.H.Bateman, S.E.Radford, and A.E.Ashcroft (2007).
Monitoring copopulated conformational states during protein folding events using electrospray ionization-ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry.
  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom, 18, 2180-2190.  
17483158 H.D.White, and A.E.Ashcroft (2007).
Real-time measurement of myosin-nucleotide noncovalent complexes by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.
  Biophys J, 93, 914-919.  
17499047 N.Elad, G.W.Farr, D.K.Clare, E.V.Orlova, A.L.Horwich, and H.R.Saibil (2007).
Topologies of a substrate protein bound to the chaperonin GroEL.
  Mol Cell, 26, 415-426.  
17018290 C.Spiess, E.J.Miller, A.J.McClellan, and J.Frydman (2006).
Identification of the TRiC/CCT substrate binding sites uncovers the function of subunit diversity in eukaryotic chaperonins.
  Mol Cell, 24, 25-37.  
16047045 A.E.Ashcroft (2005).
Recent developments in electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry: noncovalently bound protein complexes.
  Nat Prod Rep, 22, 452-464.  
15384141 A.J.Borysik, P.Read, D.R.Little, R.H.Bateman, S.E.Radford, and A.E.Ashcroft (2004).
Separation of beta2-microglobulin conformers by high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS) coupled to electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry.
  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom, 18, 2229-2234.  
15264235 A.J.Heck, and R.H.Van Den Heuvel (2004).
Investigation of intact protein complexes by mass spectrometry.
  Mass Spectrom Rev, 23, 368-389.  
15296740 T.Shimamura, A.Koike-Takeshita, K.Yokoyama, R.Masui, N.Murai, M.Yoshida, H.Taguchi, and S.Iwata (2004).
Crystal structure of the native chaperonin complex from Thermus thermophilus revealed unexpected asymmetry at the cis-cavity.
  Structure, 12, 1471-1480.
PDB codes: 1we3 1wf4
14732928 R.L.Rich, and D.G.Myszka (2003).
A survey of the year 2002 commercial optical biosensor literature.
  J Mol Recognit, 16, 351-382.  
The most recent references are shown first. Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be only a partial list as not all journals are covered by either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data so more and more references will be included with time. Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB codes are shown on the right.

 

spacer

spacer