 |
PDBsum entry 1kp8
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Chaperone
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Structural basis for groel-assisted protein folding from the crystal structure of (groel-kmgatp)14 at 2.0 a resolution
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Groel protein. Chain: a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n. Synonym: 60 kda chaperonin, protein cpn60, groel protein, ams. Engineered: yes. Mutation: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Escherichia coli. Organism_taxid: 562. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
2.00Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.243
|
R-free:
|
0.258
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
J.Wang
|
Key ref:
|
 |
J.Wang
and
D.C.Boisvert
(2003).
Structural basis for GroEL-assisted protein folding from the crystal structure of (GroEL-KMgATP)14 at 2.0A resolution.
J Mol Biol,
327,
843-855.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
30-Dec-01
|
Release date:
|
25-Mar-03
|
|
|
Supersedes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P0A6F5
(CH60_ECOLI) -
Chaperonin GroEL from Escherichia coli (strain K12)
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
548 a.a.
525 a.a.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
 |
CATH domain |
 |
|
*
PDB and UniProt seqs differ
at 3 residue positions (black
crosses)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
E.C.5.6.1.7
- chaperonin ATPase.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide = ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
ATP
Bound ligand (Het Group name = )
matches with 93.75% similarity
|
+
|
H2O
|
+
|
folded polypeptide
|
=
|
ADP
|
+
|
phosphate
|
+
|
unfolded polypeptide
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Molecule diagrams generated from .mol files obtained from the
KEGG ftp site
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
327:843-855
(2003)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structural basis for GroEL-assisted protein folding from the crystal structure of (GroEL-KMgATP)14 at 2.0A resolution.
|
|
J.Wang,
D.C.Boisvert.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Nucleotide regulates the affinity of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL for protein
substrates. GroEL binds protein substrates with high affinity in the absence of
ATP and with low affinity in its presence. We report the crystal structure of
(GroEL-KMgATP)(14) refined to 2.0 A resolution in which the ATP triphosphate
moiety is directly coordinated by both K(+) and Mg(2+). Upon the binding of
KMgATP, we observe previously unnoticed domain rotations and a 102 degrees
rotation of the apical domain surface helix I. Two major consequences are a
large lateral displacement of, and a dramatic reduction of hydrophobicity in,
the apical domain surface. These results provide a basis for the
nucleotide-dependent regulation of protein substrate binding and suggest a
mechanism for GroEL-assisted protein folding by forced unfolding.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 1.
Figure 1. The KMgATP binding site and a model for ATP
hydrolysis. (A) An electron density map is contoured at 4s
(green) and 6s (magenta) in the s[A]-weighted residual F[o]
-F[c] map using the final model with all coordinated water
molecules removed. Coordination bonds to metal ions are shown in
green, coordination polyhedron in silver, and hydrogen bonds in
red dashes. Coordination bond lengths calculated from all 14
subunits for Mg to O2a, O1b, O3g, W555, W556, and D87 are
2.24(±0.07), 2.32(±0.10), 2.21(±0.08),
2.27(±0.14), 2.10(±0.11), and 2.33(±0.05)
Å, respectively. The coordination bond lengths for K to
O1a, W551, W552, W553, W554, T30, and K51 are
2.55(±0.05), 2.50(±0.06), 2.78(±0.06),
2.60(±0.10), 2.59(±0.09), 2.59(±0.05), and
2.53(±0.08) Å, respectively. (B) A hypothetical
attacking hydroxyl ("W999") for ATP hydrolysis is placed on the
line connecting D52 to the gP atom at a distance of 2.8 Å to D52.
|
 |
Figure 6.
Figure 6. Structure-based GroEL-assisted protein folding
pathways. The affinity of GroEL for protein substrate at the
apical domain and ATP at the equatorial is labeled as H for high
and L for low; the underlined labels are asymmetric within each
ring and the lowercase indicates the process of switching.
Dashed and dotted arrows are minor alternative pathways. The
lower pathway is for large protein substrates that cannot be
encapsulated inside the GroEL/GroES cavity. The upper pathway is
for small protein substrates that can be encapsulated. A minor
upper pathway includes the migration of bound ATP from the
trans-ring to the cis-ring, before the formation of the
asymmetric GroEL/GroES complex. The formation of the GroEL/GroES
complex always requires the binding of ATP in the cis-ring. ATP
hydrolysis leads to the dead-end GroEL/ES asymmetric complex,
which can only be disassembled by the binding of ATP in the low
affinity sites of the trans-ring. The symmetric
(GroES)[7](GroEL)[14](GroES)[7] complex, which has been observed
under the physiological conditions,[8., 9., 10. and 11.] is not
included in the diagram, because it has no accessible binding
sites for the protein substrates and may represent a storage
form for the excess chaperonins.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2003,
327,
843-855)
copyright 2003.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
J.Wang
(2010).
Inclusion of weak high-resolution X-ray data for improvement of a group II intron structure.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
66,
988.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
P.D.Kiser,
G.H.Lorimer,
and
K.Palczewski
(2009).
Use of thallium to identify monovalent cation binding sites in GroEL.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun,
65,
967-971.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
C.C.Jolley,
S.A.Wells,
P.Fromme,
and
M.F.Thorpe
(2008).
Fitting low-resolution cryo-EM maps of proteins using constrained geometric simulations.
|
| |
Biophys J,
94,
1613-1621.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.P.Grason,
J.S.Gresham,
and
G.H.Lorimer
(2008).
Setting the chaperonin timer: a two-stroke, two-speed, protein machine.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
105,
17339-17344.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.P.Grason,
J.S.Gresham,
L.Widjaja,
S.C.Wehri,
and
G.H.Lorimer
(2008).
Setting the chaperonin timer: the effects of K+ and substrate protein on ATP hydrolysis.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
105,
17334-17338.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.D.Thomsen,
and
J.M.Berger
(2008).
Structural frameworks for considering microbial protein- and nucleic acid-dependent motor ATPases.
|
| |
Mol Microbiol,
69,
1071-1090.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Mosca,
B.Brannetti,
and
T.R.Schneider
(2008).
Alignment of protein structures in the presence of domain motions.
|
| |
BMC Bioinformatics,
9,
352.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Inobe,
K.Takahashi,
K.Maki,
S.Enoki,
K.Kamagata,
A.Kadooka,
M.Arai,
and
K.Kuwajima
(2008).
Asymmetry of the GroEL-GroES complex under physiological conditions as revealed by small-angle x-ray scattering.
|
| |
Biophys J,
94,
1392-1402.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.J.Son,
E.J.Shin,
S.W.Nam,
D.E.Kim,
and
S.J.Jeon
(2007).
Properties of the alpha subunit of a Chaperonin from the hyperthermophilic Crenarchaeon Aeropyrum pernix K1.
|
| |
FEMS Microbiol Lett,
266,
103-109.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.D.Kiser,
D.T.Lodowski,
and
K.Palczewski
(2007).
Purification, crystallization and structure determination of native GroEL from Escherichia coli lacking bound potassium ions.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun,
63,
457-461.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Sliozberg,
and
C.F.Abrams
(2007).
Spontaneous conformational changes in the E. coli GroEL subunit from all-atom molecular dynamics simulations.
|
| |
Biophys J,
93,
1906-1916.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Scrima,
and
A.Wittinghofer
(2006).
Dimerisation-dependent GTPase reaction of MnmE: how potassium acts as GTPase-activating element.
|
| |
EMBO J,
25,
2940-2951.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Di Cera
(2006).
A structural perspective on enzymes activated by monovalent cations.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
281,
1305-1308.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.Fan,
and
A.E.Mark
(2006).
Mimicking the action of GroEL in molecular dynamics simulations: application to the refinement of protein structures.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
15,
441-448.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Painter,
and
E.A.Merritt
(2006).
Optimal description of a protein structure in terms of multiple groups undergoing TLS motion.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
62,
439-450.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Berchanski,
D.Segal,
and
M.Eisenstein
(2005).
Modeling oligomers with Cn or Dn symmetry: application to CAPRI target 10.
|
| |
Proteins,
60,
202-206.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Y.Kim,
A.N.Semyonov,
R.J.Twieg,
A.L.Horwich,
J.Frydman,
and
W.E.Moerner
(2005).
Probing the sequence of conformationally induced polarity changes in the molecular chaperonin GroEL with fluorescence spectroscopy.
|
| |
J Phys Chem B,
109,
24517-24525.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.van der Vaart,
J.Ma,
and
M.Karplus
(2004).
The unfolding action of GroEL on a protein substrate.
|
| |
Biophys J,
87,
562-573.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Qamra,
and
S.C.Mande
(2004).
Crystal structure of the 65-kilodalton heat shock protein, chaperonin 60.2, of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
|
| |
J Bacteriol,
186,
8105-8113.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |