|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Structural genomics
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Heptameric crystal structure of mth649, an sm-like archaeal protein from methanobacterium thermautotrophicum
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Putative snrnp sm-like protein. Chain: a, b, c, d, e, f, g. Fragment: full-length sm protein. Engineered: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus. Organism_taxid: 145262. Gene: mth0649 orf. Expressed in: escherichia coli bl21(de3). Expression_system_taxid: 469008.
|
|
Biol. unit:
|
 |
Heptamer (from
)
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
1.85Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.196
|
R-free:
|
0.238
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
C.Mura,D.Eisenberg
|
Key ref:
|
 |
C.Mura
et al.
(2003).
The oligomerization and ligand-binding properties of Sm-like archaeal proteins (SmAPs).
Protein Sci,
12,
832-847.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
06-Jun-01
|
Release date:
|
25-Mar-03
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Protein Sci
12:832-847
(2003)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
The oligomerization and ligand-binding properties of Sm-like archaeal proteins (SmAPs).
|
|
C.Mura,
A.Kozhukhovsky,
M.Gingery,
M.Phillips,
D.Eisenberg.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Intron splicing is a prime example of the many types of RNA processing catalyzed
by small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) complexes. Sm proteins form the cores
of most snRNPs, and thus to learn principles of snRNP assembly we characterized
the oligomerization and ligand-binding properties of Sm-like archaeal proteins
(SmAPs) from Pyrobaculum aerophilum (Pae) and Methanobacterium
thermautotrophicum (Mth). Ultracentrifugation shows that Mth SmAP1 is
exclusively heptameric in solution, whereas Pae SmAP1 forms either
disulfide-bonded 14-mers or sub-heptameric states (depending on the redox
potential). By electron microscopy, we show that Pae and Mth SmAP1 polymerize
into bundles of well ordered fibers that probably form by head-to-tail stacking
of heptamers. The crystallographic results reported here corroborate these
findings by showing heptamers and 14-mers of both Mth and Pae SmAP1 in four new
crystal forms. The 1.9 A-resolution structure of Mth SmAP1 bound to
uridine-5'-monophosphate (UMP) reveals conserved ligand-binding sites. The
likely RNA binding site in Mth agrees with that determined for Archaeoglobus
fulgidus (Afu) SmAP1. Finally, we found that both Pae and Mth SmAP1 gel-shift
negatively supercoiled DNA. These results distinguish SmAPs from eukaryotic Sm
proteins and suggest that SmAPs have a generic single-stranded nucleic
acid-binding activity.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Various crystalline oligomers of Pae and Mth
SmAP1. A unit cell of the Pae SmAP1 C222[1] crystal form is
shown in (A), along with examples of crystallographic twofold
and 2[1] screw axes. The asymmetric unit is a heptamer (shown as
C traces in red
or blue), and a Pae SmAP1 14-mer with 72-point group symmetry is
formed from adjacent asymmetric units (7550 Å2 of surface area
is buried at the heptamer-heptamer interface). Orthogonal views
of the quasihexagonal packing of Mth SmAP1 heptamers in the
P2[1]2[1]2[1] crystal form are shown in (B). Heptamers stack
upon one another to form cylindrical tubes, thus providing a
model for the structure of the EM fibrils (see text for
explanation). The head-to-tail association of heptamers gives
the tubes a defined polarity (colored arrows). Molecular
surfaces show that the lateral packing of tubes in the crystal
may generate the striated bundles seen by EM.
|
 |
Figure 5.
Figure 5. Ligand-binding sites in the structures of Mth and
Pae 14-mers bound to UMP. The two Mth heptamers (red, blue) in
the asymmetric unit of the P2[1] form are shown in (A). A single
molecule of MPD binds identically to each monomer
(space-filling, colored by atom type with yellow carbons).
Space-filling models of the 14 UMP ligands show that they bind
in the pore region (colored by atom type, gray carbons).
Electron density for a UMP binding site is shown in (B). The
2|F[o]| - |F[c]| density is contoured at +1.2 (green) and
|F[o]| - |F[c]| maps are contoured at -3.2 (red) or +3.2
(blue).
Conserved residues that form the UMP binding sites are labeled,
and residues from different monomers are distinguished by
primes. Hydrogen-bond distances are not shown, for the sake of
clarity (see Fig. 6 Go- ).
Orthogonal views are shown in (C) for the Pae SmAP1 14-mer in
the C222[1] lattice (heptamer per a.u.). Ten glycerol molecules
bind to each heptamer (space-filling, green-colored carbons),
and seven of them occupy identical sites. Only the uridine
fragments of UMP were modeled (space-filling, gray-colored
carbons), at identical sites distal to the pore region.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from the Protein Society:
Protein Sci
(2003,
12,
832-847)
copyright 2003.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
S.D.Stojanović,
B.L.Zarić,
and
S.D.Zarić
(2010).
Protein subunit interfaces: a statistical analysis of hot spots in Sm proteins.
|
| |
J Mol Model,
16,
1743-1751.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Das,
P.Kozbial,
H.L.Axelrod,
M.D.Miller,
D.McMullan,
S.S.Krishna,
P.Abdubek,
C.Acosta,
T.Astakhova,
P.Burra,
D.Carlton,
C.Chen,
H.J.Chiu,
T.Clayton,
M.C.Deller,
L.Duan,
Y.Elias,
M.A.Elsliger,
D.Ernst,
C.Farr,
J.Feuerhelm,
A.Grzechnik,
S.K.Grzechnik,
J.Hale,
G.W.Han,
L.Jaroszewski,
K.K.Jin,
H.A.Johnson,
H.E.Klock,
M.W.Knuth,
A.Kumar,
D.Marciano,
A.T.Morse,
K.D.Murphy,
E.Nigoghossian,
A.Nopakun,
L.Okach,
S.Oommachen,
J.Paulsen,
C.Puckett,
R.Reyes,
C.L.Rife,
N.Sefcovic,
S.Sudek,
H.Tien,
C.Trame,
C.V.Trout,
H.van den Bedem,
D.Weekes,
A.White,
Q.Xu,
K.O.Hodgson,
J.Wooley,
A.M.Deacon,
A.Godzik,
S.A.Lesley,
and
I.A.Wilson
(2009).
Crystal structure of a novel Sm-like protein of putative cyanophage origin at 2.60 A resolution.
|
| |
Proteins,
75,
296-307.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.A.Reijns,
T.Auchynnikava,
and
J.D.Beggs
(2009).
Analysis of Lsm1p and Lsm8p domains in the cellular localization of Lsm complexes in budding yeast.
|
| |
FEBS J,
276,
3602-3617.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.G.Scofield,
and
M.Lynch
(2008).
Evolutionary diversification of the Sm family of RNA-associated proteins.
|
| |
Mol Biol Evol,
25,
2255-2267.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.S.Nielsen,
A.Bøggild,
C.B.Andersen,
G.Nielsen,
A.Boysen,
D.E.Brodersen,
and
P.Valentin-Hansen
(2007).
An Hfq-like protein in archaea: crystal structure and functional characterization of the Sm protein from Methanococcus jannaschii.
|
| |
RNA,
13,
2213-2223.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
R.G.Brennan,
and
T.M.Link
(2007).
Hfq structure, function and ligand binding.
|
| |
Curr Opin Microbiol,
10,
125-133.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Arluison,
S.Hohng,
R.Roy,
O.Pellegrini,
P.Régnier,
and
T.Ha
(2007).
Spectroscopic observation of RNA chaperone activities of Hfq in post-transcriptional regulation by a small non-coding RNA.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
35,
999.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.Khusial,
R.Plaag,
and
G.W.Zieve
(2005).
LSm proteins form heptameric rings that bind to RNA via repeating motifs.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci,
30,
522-528.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Tharun,
D.Muhlrad,
A.Chowdhury,
and
R.Parker
(2005).
Mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae LSM1 gene that affect mRNA decapping and 3' end protection.
|
| |
Genetics,
170,
33-46.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Albrecht,
M.Golatta,
U.Wüllner,
and
T.Lengauer
(2004).
Structural and functional analysis of ataxin-2 and ataxin-3.
|
| |
Eur J Biochem,
271,
3155-3170.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.J.Mikulecky,
M.K.Kaw,
C.C.Brescia,
J.C.Takach,
D.D.Sledjeski,
and
A.L.Feig
(2004).
Escherichia coli Hfq has distinct interaction surfaces for DsrA, rpoS and poly(A) RNAs.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
11,
1206-1214.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Mura,
M.Phillips,
A.Kozhukhovsky,
and
D.Eisenberg
(2003).
Structure and assembly of an augmented Sm-like archaeal protein 14-mer.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
100,
4539-4544.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
code is
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |