 |
PDBsum entry 1is4
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sugar binding protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1is4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
321:879-889
(2002)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Crystal structure of a conger eel galectin (congerin II) at 1.45A resolution: implication for the accelerated evolution of a new ligand-binding site following gene duplication.
|
|
T.Shirai,
Y.Matsui,
C.Shionyu-Mitsuyama,
T.Yamane,
H.Kamiya,
C.Ishii,
T.Ogawa,
K.Muramoto.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The crystal structure of congerin II, a galectin family lectin from conger eel,
was determined at 1.45A resolution. The previously determined structure of its
isoform, congerin I, had revealed a fold evolution via strand swap; however, the
structure of congerin II described here resembles other prototype galectins. A
comparison of the two congerin genes with that of several other galectins
suggests acceralated evolution of both congerin genes following gene
duplication. The presence of a Mes (2-[N-morpholino]ethanesulfonic acid)
molecule near the carbohydrate-binding site in the crystal structure points to
the possibility of an additional binding site in congerin II. The binding site
consists of a group of residues that had been replaced following gene
duplication suggesting that the binding site was built under selective pressure.
Congerin II may be a protein specialized for biological defense with an affinity
for target carbohydrates on parasites' cell surface.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. (a) The carbohydrate-binding site of congerin II.
The side-chains that bind the lactose or Mes molecules are shown
in blue. The hydrogen bonds between protein and ligand are shown
in yellow. The water molecule mediating hydrogen bonding is
represented as a red sphere. Omit electron density map around
the ligand molecules is superposed as purple network. The map
was phased by the final model without the ligand atoms, and
contoured at 3.0s level. (b) Comparison between the binding
sites of congerin II in ternary complex (blue) and in apo form
(orange). The spheres are water molecules in the apo form;
hydrogen bonds are shown in yellow.
|
 |
Figure 7.
Figure 7. A comparison of carbohydrate-binding sites of
congerin II (blue), congerin I (orange) and bovine galectin-1
(gray). The residues are labeled as congerin II amino acid and
residue number: corresponding amino acid of congerin I:
corresponding amino acid of galectin-1.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2002,
321,
879-889)
copyright 2002.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
A.Konno,
S.Yonemaru,
A.Kitagawa,
K.Muramoto,
T.Shirai,
and
T.Ogawa
(2010).
Protein engineering of conger eel galectins by tracing of molecular evolution using probable ancestral mutants.
|
| |
BMC Evol Biol,
10,
43.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Long,
and
D.Yang
(2009).
Buffer interference with protein dynamics: a case study on human liver fatty acid binding protein.
|
| |
Biophys J,
96,
1482-1488.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Shirai,
C.Shionyu-Mitsuyama,
T.Ogawa,
and
K.Muramoto
(2006).
Structure based studies of the adaptive diversification process of congerins.
|
| |
Mol Divers,
10,
567-573.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.R.Caffrey,
S.Somaroo,
J.D.Hughes,
J.Mintseris,
and
E.S.Huang
(2004).
Are protein-protein interfaces more conserved in sequence than the rest of the protein surface?
|
| |
Protein Sci,
13,
190-202.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.R.Vasta,
H.Ahmed,
and
E.W.Odom
(2004).
Structural and functional diversity of lectin repertoires in invertebrates, protochordates and ectothermic vertebrates.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
14,
617-630.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
|
');
}
}
 |