 |
PDBsum entry 1gml
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Chaperone
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Crystal structure of the mouse cct gamma apical domain (triclinic)
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
T-complex protein 1 subunit gamma. Chain: a, b, c, d. Fragment: apical domain, residues 210-380. Synonym: tcp-1-gamma, cct-gamma, matricin, mtric-p5. Engineered: yes
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Mus musculus. Mouse. Organism_taxid: 10090. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562.
|
|
Biol. unit:
|
 |
Dimer (from PDB file)
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
2.20Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.203
|
R-free:
|
0.234
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
G.Pappenberger,J.A.Wilsher,S.M.Roe,K.R.Willison,L.H.Pearl
|
Key ref:
|
 |
G.Pappenberger
et al.
(2002).
Crystal structure of the CCTgamma apical domain: implications for substrate binding to the eukaryotic cytosolic chaperonin.
J Mol Biol,
318,
1367-1379.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
17-Sep-01
|
Release date:
|
18-Jun-02
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P80318
(TCPG_MOUSE) -
T-complex protein 1 subunit gamma from Mus musculus
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
545 a.a.
155 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Key: |
 |
PfamA domain |
 |
 |
 |
Secondary structure |
 |
 |
CATH domain |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
318:1367-1379
(2002)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Crystal structure of the CCTgamma apical domain: implications for substrate binding to the eukaryotic cytosolic chaperonin.
|
|
G.Pappenberger,
J.A.Wilsher,
S.M.Roe,
D.J.Counsell,
K.R.Willison,
L.H.Pearl.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The chaperonin containing TCP-1 (CCT, also known as TRiC) is the only member of
the chaperonin family found in the cytosol of eukaryotes. Like other
chaperonins, it assists the folding of newly synthesised proteins. It is,
however, unique in its specificity towards only a small subset of non-native
proteins. We determined two crystal structures of mouse CCTgamma apical domain
at 2.2 A and 2.8 A resolution. They reveal a surface patch facing the inside of
the torus that is highly evolutionarily conserved and specific for the CCTgamma
apical domain. This putative substrate-binding region consists of predominantly
positively charged side-chains. It suggests that the specificity of this apical
domain towards its substrate, partially folded tubulin, is conferred by polar
and electrostatic interactions. The site and nature of substrate interaction are
thus profoundly different between CCT and its eubacterial homologue GroEL,
consistent with their different functions in general versus specific protein
folding assistance.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Structural comparison of apical domains from
group II and group I chaperonins. (a) Stereo view of a ribbon
diagram of the CCTg apical domain structure. The secondary
structure elements are numbered according to Braig et al.[46]
a-Helices, H8-H10; b-strands, S6-S13. No interpretable electron
density was observed for the N-terminal half of the helical
protrusion (K248-D263). (b) b-Apical domain of the archaeal
group II chaperonin thermosome. Coordinates were obtained from
the crystal structure of the complete thermosome. [6] (c) Apical
domain of the eubacterial group I chaperonin GroEL. [29] (d)
Stereo view of the 2F[o] -F[c] electron density map from the
triclinic crystal form, contoured at 1.0s. The cysteine residues
C366 and C372 are found to form a disulphide bridge (indicated),
covalently closing the loop around P369 near the C terminus of
the domain.
|
 |
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Identification of the substrate-binding region of
the mouse CCTg apical domain. In the left column, the protein
regions lining the inside of the torus are facing the viewer.
The orientation in the right column is rotated by 180°,
showing the outside of the torus. (a) Ribbon diagram to
illustrate the orientations of the molecule. (b) Surface regions
interacting with neighbouring subunits (green, blue) or the
intermediate domain of the same subunit (red) in the complete
CCT complex. This has been modelled on the basis of the
thermosome crystal structure[6] by superimposing the CCTg apical
domain onto the thermosome b-apical domain and labelling all
atoms of the CCTg apical domain closer than 5 Å to atoms
of the surrounding thermosome structure. (c) Residue
conservation, mapped onto the surface of the molecule (blue,
conserved; red, variable). (d) Signature residues of the CCTg
apical domain (green), mapped onto its surface.
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(2002,
318,
1367-1379)
copyright 2002.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
K.M.Knee,
D.R.Goulet,
J.Zhang,
B.Chen,
W.Chiu,
and
J.A.King
(2011).
The group II chaperonin Mm-Cpn binds and refolds human γD crystallin.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
20,
30-41.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Seixas,
T.Cruto,
A.Tavares,
J.Gaertig,
and
H.Soares
(2010).
CCTalpha and CCTdelta chaperonin subunits are essential and required for cilia assembly and maintenance in Tetrahymena.
|
| |
PLoS One,
5,
e10704.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Jayasinghe,
C.Tewmey,
and
G.Stan
(2010).
Versatile substrate protein recognition mechanism of the eukaryotic chaperonin CCT.
|
| |
Proteins,
78,
1254-1265.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Cong,
M.L.Baker,
J.Jakana,
D.Woolford,
E.J.Miller,
S.Reissmann,
R.N.Kumar,
A.M.Redding-Johanson,
T.S.Batth,
A.Mukhopadhyay,
S.J.Ludtke,
J.Frydman,
and
W.Chiu
(2010).
4.0-A resolution cryo-EM structure of the mammalian chaperonin TRiC/CCT reveals its unique subunit arrangement.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
107,
4967-4972.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
K.I.Brackley,
and
J.Grantham
(2009).
Activities of the chaperonin containing TCP-1 (CCT): implications for cell cycle progression and cytoskeletal organisation.
|
| |
Cell Stress Chaperones,
14,
23-31.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Gong,
Y.Kakihara,
N.Krogan,
J.Greenblatt,
A.Emili,
Z.Zhang,
and
W.A.Houry
(2009).
An atlas of chaperone-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: implications to protein folding pathways in the cell.
|
| |
Mol Syst Biol,
5,
275.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Y.Yam,
Y.Xia,
H.T.Lin,
A.Burlingame,
M.Gerstein,
and
J.Frydman
(2008).
Defining the TRiC/CCT interactome links chaperonin function to stabilization of newly made proteins with complex topologies.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
15,
1255-1262.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.R.Booth,
A.S.Meyer,
Y.Cong,
M.Topf,
A.Sali,
S.J.Ludtke,
W.Chiu,
and
J.Frydman
(2008).
Mechanism of lid closure in the eukaryotic chaperonin TRiC/CCT.
|
| |
Nat Struct Mol Biol,
15,
746-753.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.M.Altschuler,
and
K.R.Willison
(2008).
Development of free-energy-based models for chaperonin containing TCP-1 mediated folding of actin.
|
| |
J R Soc Interface,
5,
1391-1408.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.L.Horwich,
W.A.Fenton,
E.Chapman,
and
G.W.Farr
(2007).
Two families of chaperonin: physiology and mechanism.
|
| |
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol,
23,
115-145.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.A.Ranea,
C.Yeats,
A.Grant,
and
C.A.Orengo
(2007).
Predicting protein function with hierarchical phylogenetic profiles: the Gene3D Phylo-Tuner method applied to eukaryotic genomes.
|
| |
PLoS Comput Biol,
3,
e237.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Spiess,
E.J.Miller,
A.J.McClellan,
and
J.Frydman
(2006).
Identification of the TRiC/CCT substrate binding sites uncovers the function of subunit diversity in eukaryotic chaperonins.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
24,
25-37.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.L.Lukov,
C.M.Baker,
P.J.Ludtke,
T.Hu,
M.D.Carter,
R.A.Hackett,
C.D.Thulin,
and
B.M.Willardson
(2006).
Mechanism of assembly of G protein betagamma subunits by protein kinase CK2-phosphorylated phosducin-like protein and the cytosolic chaperonin complex.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
281,
22261-22274.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.H.Michell,
V.L.Heath,
M.A.Lemmon,
and
S.K.Dove
(2006).
Phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate: metabolism and cellular functions.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci,
31,
52-63.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Pucciarelli,
S.K.Parker,
H.W.Detrich,
and
R.Melki
(2006).
Characterization of the cytoplasmic chaperonin containing TCP-1 from the Antarctic fish Notothenia coriiceps.
|
| |
Extremophiles,
10,
537-549.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Spiess,
A.S.Meyer,
S.Reissmann,
and
J.Frydman
(2004).
Mechanism of the eukaryotic chaperonin: protein folding in the chamber of secrets.
|
| |
Trends Cell Biol,
14,
598-604.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Iizuka,
S.So,
T.Inobe,
T.Yoshida,
T.Zako,
K.Kuwajima,
and
M.Yohda
(2004).
Role of the helical protrusion in the conformational change and molecular chaperone activity of the archaeal group II chaperonin.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
279,
18834-18839.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.E.Feldman,
C.Spiess,
D.E.Howard,
and
J.Frydman
(2003).
Tumorigenic mutations in VHL disrupt folding in vivo by interfering with chaperonin binding.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
12,
1213-1224.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |