 |
PDBsum entry 1git
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gtp-binding protein
|
PDB id
|
|
|
|
1git
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Structure
4:1277-1290
(1996)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structure of the GDP-Pi complex of Gly203-->Ala gialpha1: a mimic of the ternary product complex of galpha-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis.
|
|
A.M.Berghuis,
E.Lee,
A.S.Raw,
A.G.Gilman,
S.R.Sprang.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
BACKGROUND: G proteins play a vital role in transmembrane signalling events. In
their inactive form G proteins exist as heterotrimers consisting of an alpha
subunit, complexed with GDP and a dimer of betagamma subunits. Upon stimulation
by receptors, G protein alpha subunits exchange GDP for GTP and dissociate from
betagamma . Thus activated, alphasubunits stimulate or inhibit downstream
effectors. The duration of the activated state corresponds to the single
turnover rate of GTP hydrolysis, which is typically in the range of seconds. In
Gialpha1, the Gly203-->Ala mutation reduces the affinity of the substrate for
Mg2+, inhibits a key conformational step that occurs upon GTP binding and
consequently inhibits the release of betagamma subunits from the GTP complex.
The structure of the Gly203-->Ala mutant of Gialpha1 (G203AGialpha1) bound to
the slowly hydrolyzing analog of GTP (GTPgammaS) has been determined in order to
elucidate the structural changes that take place during hydrolysis. RESULTS: We
have determined the three dimensional structure of a Gly203-->Ala mutant of
Gialpha1 at 2.6 A resolution. Although crystals were grown in the presence of
GTPgammaS and Mg2+, the catalytic site contains a molecule of GDP and a
phosphate ion, but no Mg2+. The phosphate ion is bound to a site near that
occupied by the gamma-phosphate of GTPgammaS in the activated wild-type alpha
subunit. A region of the protein, termed the Switch II helix, twists and bends
to adopt a conformation that is radically different from that observed in other
Gialpha1 subunit complexes. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of
crystallization, the Gly203-->Ala mutation appears to stabilize a conformation
that may be similar, although perhaps not identical, to the transient ternary
product complex of Gialpha1-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis. The rearrangement of the
Switch II helix avoids a potential steric conflict caused by the mutation.
However, it appears that dissociation of the gamma-phosphate from the
pentacoordinate intermediate also requires a conformational change in Switch II.
Thus, a conformational rearrangement of the Switch II helix may be required in
Galpha-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Molecular architecture of G203AG[iα1]. (a) Helical
segments are shown as green ribbons and β strands as blue
arrows; secondary structural elements near the catalytic site
are labeled, GDP and Pi are shown as ball-and-stick models.
Switch regions (Sw) are labeled (I–IV) and ‘N’ and
‘C’ mark the locations of residues 34 and 343, respectively.
(b) A superposition of the Cα traces of the G[iα1] subunit
bound to GDP (blue), G[iα1]bound to GTPγS–Mg^2+ (red), and
the GDP–Pi complex of G203AG[iα1] (green). The Cα atoms of
residues 40–178 and 220–340 were used to generate the
superposition. Figure 2. Molecular architecture of
G203AG[iα1]. (a) Helical segments are shown as green ribbons
and β strands as blue arrows; secondary structural elements
near the catalytic site are labeled, GDP and Pi are shown as
ball-and-stick models. Switch regions (Sw) are labeled
(I–IV) and ‘N’ and ‘C’ mark the locations of residues
34 and 343, respectively. (b) A superposition of the Cα traces
of the G[iα1] subunit bound to GDP (blue), G[iα1]bound to
GTPγS–Mg^2+ (red), and the GDP–Pi complex of G203AG[iα1]
(green). The Cα atoms of residues 40–178 and 220–340 were
used to generate the superposition. (Figure was generated using
the program SETOR [[3]55].)
|
 |
Figure 8.
Figure 8. Conformational states along the reaction pathway (see
text). (a) G[iα1]–GTPγS–Mg^2+. (b) Structure of the
pentacoordinate intermediate modeled on the structure of the
G[iα1]–GDP–AlF[4]^−–Mg^2+ complex. (c)
G[iα1]–GDP–Pi complex modeled on the structure of
G203A–GDP–Pi. (d) G[iα1]–GDP. Color scheme is the same as
that used in Figure 3. Figure 8. Conformational states along
the reaction pathway (see text). (a) G[iα1]–GTPγS–Mg^2+.
(b) Structure of the pentacoordinate intermediate modeled on the
structure of the G[iα1]–GDP–AlF[4]^−–Mg^2+ complex. (c)
G[iα1]–GDP–Pi complex modeled on the structure of
G203A–GDP–Pi. (d) G[iα1]–GDP. Color scheme is the same as
that used in [3]Figure 3. (Figure was generated using the
program SETOR [[4]55].)
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Structure
(1996,
4,
1277-1290)
copyright 1996.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
E.Villa,
J.Sengupta,
L.G.Trabuco,
J.LeBarron,
W.T.Baxter,
T.R.Shaikh,
R.A.Grassucci,
P.Nissen,
M.Ehrenberg,
K.Schulten,
and
J.Frank
(2009).
Ribosome-induced changes in elongation factor Tu conformation control GTP hydrolysis.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
106,
1063-1068.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
A.F.Neuwald
(2007).
Galpha Gbetagamma dissociation may be due to retraction of a buried lysine and disruption of an aromatic cluster by a GTP-sensing Arg Trp pair.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
16,
2570-2577.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.S.Shin,
M.G.Acker,
D.Maag,
J.R.Kim,
J.R.Lorsch,
and
T.E.Dever
(2007).
Intragenic suppressor mutations restore GTPase and translation functions of a eukaryotic initiation factor 5B switch II mutant.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
27,
1677-1685.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Wittinghofer
(2006).
Phosphoryl transfer in Ras proteins, conclusive or elusive?
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci,
31,
20-23.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Majumdar,
S.Ramachandran,
and
R.A.Cerione
(2006).
New insights into the role of conserved, essential residues in the GTP binding/GTP hydrolytic cycle of large G proteins.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
281,
9219-9226.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Pasqualato,
and
J.Cherfils
(2005).
Crystallographic evidence for substrate-assisted GTP hydrolysis by a small GTP binding protein.
|
| |
Structure,
13,
533-540.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.D.Lawson,
E.Pate,
I.Rayment,
and
R.G.Yount
(2004).
Molecular dynamics analysis of structural factors influencing back door pi release in myosin.
|
| |
Biophys J,
86,
3794-3803.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Versele,
K.Lemaire,
and
J.M.Thevelein
(2001).
Sex and sugar in yeast: two distinct GPCR systems.
|
| |
EMBO Rep,
2,
574-579.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Padmanabhan,
and
D.M.Freymann
(2001).
The conformation of bound GMPPNP suggests a mechanism for gating the active site of the SRP GTPase.
|
| |
Structure,
9,
859-867.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Pasqualato,
J.Ménétrey,
M.Franco,
and
J.Cherfils
(2001).
The structural GDP/GTP cycle of human Arf6.
|
| |
EMBO Rep,
2,
234-238.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
F.J.Moy,
P.K.Chanda,
M.I.Cockett,
W.Edris,
P.G.Jones,
K.Mason,
S.Semus,
and
R.Powers
(2000).
NMR structure of free RGS4 reveals an induced conformational change upon binding Galpha.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
39,
7063-7073.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Ménétrey,
and
J.Cherfils
(1999).
Structure of the small G protein Rap2 in a non-catalytic complex with GTP.
|
| |
Proteins,
37,
465-473.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Müller,
A.Marx,
S.Sack,
Y.H.Song,
and
E.Mandelkow
(1999).
The structure of the nucleotide-binding site of kinesin.
|
| |
Biol Chem,
380,
981-992.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.A.Levine
(1999).
Clinical implications of genetic defects in G proteins: oncogenic mutations in G alpha s as the molecular basis for the McCune-Albright syndrome.
|
| |
Arch Med Res,
30,
522-531.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.E.Bernstein,
and
W.G.Hol
(1998).
Crystal structures of substrates and products bound to the phosphoglycerate kinase active site reveal the catalytic mechanism.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
37,
4429-4436.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.E.Coleman,
and
S.R.Sprang
(1998).
Crystal structures of the G protein Gi alpha 1 complexed with GDP and Mg2+: a crystallographic titration experiment.
|
| |
Biochemistry,
37,
14376-14385.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
M.A.Wall,
B.A.Posner,
and
S.R.Sprang
(1998).
Structural basis of activity and subunit recognition in G protein heterotrimers.
|
| |
Structure,
6,
1169-1183.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Bohm,
R.Gaudet,
and
P.B.Sigler
(1997).
Structural aspects of heterotrimeric G-protein signaling.
|
| |
Curr Opin Biotechnol,
8,
480-487.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Cherfils,
J.Ménétrey,
G.Le Bras,
I.Janoueix-Lerosey,
J.de Gunzburg,
J.R.Garel,
and
I.Auzat
(1997).
Crystal structures of the small G protein Rap2A in complex with its substrate GTP, with GDP and with GTPgammaS.
|
| |
EMBO J,
16,
5582-5591.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.R.Sprang
(1997).
G proteins, effectors and GAPs: structure and mechanism.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
7,
849-856.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Zor,
M.Bar-Yaacov,
S.Elgavish,
B.Shaanan,
and
Z.Selinger
(1997).
Rescue of a mutant G-protein by substrate-assisted catalysis.
|
| |
Eur J Biochem,
249,
330-336.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |