|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
|
PDB id:
|
 |
|
 |
| Name: |
 |
Chaperone
|
 |
|
Title:
|
 |
Crystal structure of a groel (apical domain) and a dodecameric peptide complex
|
|
Structure:
|
 |
Groel. Chain: a, b, c, d. Fragment: apical domain. Synonym: chaperone hsp60. Engineered: yes. 12-mer peptide. Chain: e, f, g, h. Engineered: yes. Other_details: selected from phage display peptide library
|
|
Source:
|
 |
Escherichia coli. Organism_taxid: 562. Expressed in: escherichia coli. Expression_system_taxid: 562. Synthetic: yes. Other_details: the peptide was chemically synthesized and was selected from phage display peptide library.
|
|
Biol. unit:
|
 |
Tetramer (from
)
|
|
Resolution:
|
 |
|
2.10Å
|
R-factor:
|
0.215
|
R-free:
|
0.264
|
|
|
Authors:
|
 |
L.Chen,P.B.Sigler
|
Key ref:
|
 |
L.Chen
and
P.B.Sigler
(1999).
The crystal structure of a GroEL/peptide complex: plasticity as a basis for substrate diversity.
Cell,
99,
757-768.
PubMed id:
DOI:
|
 |
|
Date:
|
 |
|
07-Dec-99
|
Release date:
|
12-Jan-00
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCHECK
|
|
|
|
|
Headers
|
 |
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P0A6F5
(CH60_ECOLI) -
Chaperonin GroEL from Escherichia coli (strain K12)
|
|
|
|
Seq: Struc:
|
 |
 |
 |
548 a.a.
146 a.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Enzyme class:
|
 |
Chains A, B, C, D:
E.C.5.6.1.7
- chaperonin ATPase.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Reaction:
|
 |
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide = ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
ATP
|
+
|
H2O
|
+
|
folded polypeptide
|
=
|
ADP
|
+
|
phosphate
|
+
|
unfolded polypeptide
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Molecule diagrams generated from .mol files obtained from the
KEGG ftp site
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Cell
99:757-768
(1999)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
The crystal structure of a GroEL/peptide complex: plasticity as a basis for substrate diversity.
|
|
L.Chen,
P.B.Sigler.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
The chaperonin GroEL is a double toriodal assembly that with its cochaperonin
GroES facilitates protein folding with an ATP-dependent mechanism. Nonnative
conformations of diverse protein substrates bind to the apical domains
surrounding the opening of the double toroid's central cavity. Using phage
display, we have selected peptides with high affinity for the isolated apical
domain. We have determined the crystal structures of the complexes formed by the
most strongly bound peptide with the isolated apical domain, and with GroEL. The
peptide interacts with the groove between paired alpha helices in a manner
similar to that of the GroES mobile loop. Our structural analysis, combined with
other results, suggests that various modes of molecular plasticity are
responsible for tight promiscuous binding of nonnative substrates and their
release into the shielded cis assembly.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Structural Comparisons of Three Peptides
Interacting with Helices H and I of the Apical DomainSBP is
yellow, the GroES mobile loop ([46]) is cyan, the N-terminal
extension of the apical domain ( [6]) is magenta, and helices H
and I are red.(A) Superposition of Cα coordinates of the apical
domain of three structures, showing the backbone of three
different peptides bound over the peptide-binding groove formed
by helix H and helix I. Structure of the helices displayed here
is taken from the structure of the SBP/apical domain
complex.(B–D) Molecular surfaces color coded by curvature
(green for convex, and gray for concave) of the binding groove
in SBP/apical domain, GroEL/GroES/(ADP)[7], and N-terminal
extension/apical domain, respectively. The orientation in these
three figures is the same as in (A). For clarity, only side
chains of residues located at the C-terminal arms of the β turn
of the SBP (starting from W7) and the GroES mobile loop
(starting from I25) are shown, as these segments form most of
the contacts with the binding site. The N-terminal arms of the
β turn of these two peptides are shown as a Cα trace. Residues
in the peptides that form extensive side chain interactions with
the binding site are labeled.(A) was produced using MOLSCRIPT
and RASTER 3D ([22 and 31]), and (B)–(D) were generated with
GRASP ( [32]).
|
 |
Figure 6.
Figure 6. Molecular Surface Representation of the
Substrate-Binding Sites in GroELThe molecular surface of the
binding sites formed by helices H and I is highlighted in red.
The binding sites form “elastic rings” located on the
opening of the GroEL central cavities.(A) Top view of GroEL.(B)
Stereo view of the central cavities of binding-competent
GroEL.The three subunits from each of the rings nearest the
reader were removed to show the inside of the central cavities.
Figures were generated in GRASP ([32]).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Cell Press:
Cell
(1999,
99,
757-768)
copyright 1999.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
M.Jayasinghe,
C.Tewmey,
and
G.Stan
(2010).
Versatile substrate protein recognition mechanism of the eukaryotic chaperonin CCT.
|
| |
Proteins,
78,
1254-1265.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Li,
Z.Zheng,
A.Ramsey,
and
L.Chen
(2010).
Analysis of peptides and proteins in their binding to GroEL.
|
| |
J Pept Sci,
16,
693-700.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.L.Horwich,
and
W.A.Fenton
(2009).
Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: using a central cavity to kinetically assist polypeptide chain folding.
|
| |
Q Rev Biophys,
42,
83.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.M.Kumar,
G.Khare,
C.V.Srikanth,
A.K.Tyagi,
A.A.Sardesai,
and
S.C.Mande
(2009).
Facilitated oligomerization of mycobacterial GroEL: evidence for phosphorylation-mediated oligomerization.
|
| |
J Bacteriol,
191,
6525-6538.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Li,
X.Qian,
J.Hu,
and
B.Sha
(2009).
Molecular chaperone Hsp70/Hsp90 prepares the mitochondrial outer membrane translocon receptor Tom71 for preprotein loading.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
23852-23859.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Reumers,
S.Maurer-Stroh,
J.Schymkowitz,
and
F.Rousseau
(2009).
Protein sequences encode safeguards against aggregation.
|
| |
Hum Mutat,
30,
431-437.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.S.Harris,
J.L.Casey,
A.M.Coley,
J.A.Karas,
J.K.Sabo,
Y.Y.Tan,
O.Dolezal,
R.S.Norton,
A.B.Hughes,
D.Scanlon,
and
M.Foley
(2009).
Rapid optimization of a peptide inhibitor of malaria parasite invasion by comprehensive N-methyl scanning.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
9361-9371.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.V.Marchenkov,
and
G.V.Semisotnov
(2009).
GroEL-Assisted Protein Folding: Does It Occur Within the Chaperonin Inner Cavity?
|
| |
Int J Mol Sci,
10,
2066-2083.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Cong,
Q.Zhang,
D.Woolford,
T.Schweikardt,
H.Khant,
M.Dougherty,
S.J.Ludtke,
W.Chiu,
and
H.Decker
(2009).
Structural mechanism of SDS-induced enzyme activity of scorpion hemocyanin revealed by electron cryomicroscopy.
|
| |
Structure,
17,
749-758.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Li,
X.Gao,
and
L.Chen
(2009).
GroEL Recognizes an Amphipathic Helix and Binds to the Hydrophobic Side.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
284,
4324-4331.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Madan,
Z.Lin,
and
H.S.Rye
(2008).
Triggering Protein Folding within the GroEL-GroES Complex.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
283,
32003-32013.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
E.Gur,
and
R.T.Sauer
(2008).
Recognition of misfolded proteins by Lon, a AAA(+) protease.
|
| |
Genes Dev,
22,
2267-2277.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Hosono,
T.Ueno,
H.Taguchi,
F.Motojima,
T.Zako,
M.Yoshida,
and
T.Funatsu
(2008).
Kinetic Analysis of Conformational Changes of GroEL Based on the Fluorescence of Tyrosine 506.
|
| |
Protein J,
27,
461-468.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.D.Thomsen,
and
J.M.Berger
(2008).
Structural frameworks for considering microbial protein- and nucleic acid-dependent motor ATPases.
|
| |
Mol Microbiol,
69,
1071-1090.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Yoshiike,
R.Minai,
Y.Matsuo,
Y.R.Chen,
T.Kimura,
and
A.Takashima
(2008).
Amyloid oligomer conformation in a group of natively folded proteins.
|
| |
PLoS ONE,
3,
e3235.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Graef,
G.Seewald,
and
T.Langer
(2007).
Substrate recognition by AAA+ ATPases: distinct substrate binding modes in ATP-dependent protease Yme1 of the mitochondrial intermembrane space.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
27,
2476-2485.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Elad,
G.W.Farr,
D.K.Clare,
E.V.Orlova,
A.L.Horwich,
and
H.R.Saibil
(2007).
Topologies of a substrate protein bound to the chaperonin GroEL.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
26,
415-426.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.D.Kiser,
D.T.Lodowski,
and
K.Palczewski
(2007).
Purification, crystallization and structure determination of native GroEL from Escherichia coli lacking bound potassium ions.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun,
63,
457-461.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
W.Zheng,
B.R.Brooks,
and
D.Thirumalai
(2007).
Allosteric transitions in the chaperonin GroEL are captured by a dominant normal mode that is most robust to sequence variations.
|
| |
Biophys J,
93,
2289-2299.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.W.Ying,
H.Taguchi,
and
T.Ueda
(2006).
Co-translational binding of GroEL to nascent polypeptides is followed by post-translational encapsulation by GroES to mediate protein folding.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
281,
21813-21819.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Spiess,
E.J.Miller,
A.J.McClellan,
and
J.Frydman
(2006).
Identification of the TRiC/CCT substrate binding sites uncovers the function of subunit diversity in eukaryotic chaperonins.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
24,
25-37.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Stan,
B.R.Brooks,
G.H.Lorimer,
and
D.Thirumalai
(2006).
Residues in substrate proteins that interact with GroEL in the capture process are buried in the native state.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
103,
4433-4438.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.J.Cliff,
C.Limpkin,
A.Cameron,
S.G.Burston,
and
A.R.Clarke
(2006).
Elucidation of steps in the capture of a protein substrate for efficient encapsulation by GroE.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
281,
21266-21275.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
O.Danziger,
L.Shimon,
and
A.Horovitz
(2006).
Glu257 in GroEL is a sensor involved in coupling polypeptide substrate binding to stimulation of ATP hydrolysis.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
15,
1270-1276.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Berezov,
M.J.McNeill,
A.Iriarte,
and
M.Martinez-Carrion
(2005).
Electron paramagnetic resonance and fluorescence studies of the conformation of aspartate aminotransferase bound to GroEL.
|
| |
Protein J,
24,
465-478.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Stan,
B.R.Brooks,
G.H.Lorimer,
and
D.Thirumalai
(2005).
Identifying natural substrates for chaperonins using a sequence-based approach.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
14,
193-201.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.F.Swain,
and
L.M.Gierasch
(2005).
First glimpses of a chaperonin-bound folding intermediate.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
102,
13715-13716.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.Leulliot,
S.Quevillon-Cheruel,
M.Graille,
M.Schiltz,
K.Blondeau,
J.Janin,
and
H.Van Tilbeurgh
(2005).
Crystal structure of yeast YER010Cp, a knotable member of the RraA protein family.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
14,
2751-2758.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Horst,
E.B.Bertelsen,
J.Fiaux,
G.Wider,
A.L.Horwich,
and
K.Wüthrich
(2005).
Direct NMR observation of a substrate protein bound to the chaperonin GroEL.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
102,
12748-12753.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.van der Vaart,
J.Ma,
and
M.Karplus
(2004).
The unfolding action of GroEL on a protein substrate.
|
| |
Biophys J,
87,
562-573.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
F.Motojima,
C.Chaudhry,
W.A.Fenton,
G.W.Farr,
and
A.L.Horwich
(2004).
Substrate polypeptide presents a load on the apical domains of the chaperonin GroEL.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
101,
15005-15012.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Li,
and
B.Sha
(2004).
Peptide substrate identification for yeast Hsp40 Ydj1 by screening the phage display library.
|
| |
Biol Proced Online,
6,
204-208.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Yoshimune,
Y.Ninomiya,
M.Wakayama,
and
M.Moriguchi
(2004).
Molecular chaperones facilitate the soluble expression of N-acyl-D-amino acid amidohydrolases in Escherichia coli.
|
| |
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol,
31,
421-426.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.F.Harris,
A.K.Shiau,
and
D.A.Agard
(2004).
The crystal structure of the carboxy-terminal dimerization domain of htpG, the Escherichia coli Hsp90, reveals a potential substrate binding site.
|
| |
Structure,
12,
1087-1097.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Shimamura,
A.Koike-Takeshita,
K.Yokoyama,
R.Masui,
N.Murai,
M.Yoshida,
H.Taguchi,
and
S.Iwata
(2004).
Crystal structure of the native chaperonin complex from Thermus thermophilus revealed unexpected asymmetry at the cis-cavity.
|
| |
Structure,
12,
1471-1480.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Ueno,
H.Taguchi,
H.Tadakuma,
M.Yoshida,
and
T.Funatsu
(2004).
GroEL mediates protein folding with a two successive timer mechanism.
|
| |
Mol Cell,
14,
423-434.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Sot,
S.Bañuelos,
J.M.Valpuesta,
and
A.Muga
(2003).
GroEL stability and function. Contribution of the ionic interactions at the inter-ring contact sites.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
278,
32083-32090.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Li,
X.Qian,
and
B.Sha
(2003).
The crystal structure of the yeast Hsp40 Ydj1 complexed with its peptide substrate.
|
| |
Structure,
11,
1475-1483.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Narayanan,
B.Bösl,
S.Walter,
and
B.Reif
(2003).
Importance of low-oligomeric-weight species for prion propagation in the yeast prion system Sup35/Hsp104.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
100,
9286-9291.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.E.Ashcroft,
A.Brinker,
J.E.Coyle,
F.Weber,
M.Kaiser,
L.Moroder,
M.R.Parsons,
J.Jager,
U.F.Hartl,
M.Hayer-Hartl,
and
S.E.Radford
(2002).
Structural plasticity and noncovalent substrate binding in the GroEL apical domain. A study using electrospay ionization mass spectrometry and fluorescence binding studies.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
277,
33115-33126.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
F.U.Hartl,
and
M.Hayer-Hartl
(2002).
Molecular chaperones in the cytosol: from nascent chain to folded protein.
|
| |
Science,
295,
1852-1858.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
H.R.Saibil,
and
N.A.Ranson
(2002).
The chaperonin folding machine.
|
| |
Trends Biochem Sci,
27,
627-632.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Gozu,
M.Hoshino,
T.Higurashi,
H.Kato,
and
Y.Goto
(2002).
The interaction of beta(2)-glycoprotein I domain V with chaperonin GroEL: the similarity with the domain V and membrane interaction.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
11,
2792-2803.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Lee,
C.Y.Fan,
J.M.Younger,
H.Ren,
and
D.M.Cyr
(2002).
Identification of essential residues in the type II Hsp40 Sis1 that function in polypeptide binding.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
277,
21675-21682.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Nagpal,
K.J.Kaur,
D.Jain,
and
D.M.Salunke
(2002).
Plasticity in structure and interactions is critical for the action of indolicidin, an antibacterial peptide of innate immune origin.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
11,
2158-2167.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.Walter,
and
J.Buchner
(2002).
Molecular chaperones--cellular machines for protein folding.
|
| |
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl,
41,
1098-1113.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.C.Fang,
and
M.Cheng
(2002).
The effect of C-terminal mutations of HSP60 on protein folding.
|
| |
J Biomed Sci,
9,
223-233.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.P.Demchenko
(2001).
Recognition between flexible protein molecules: induced and assisted folding.
|
| |
J Mol Recognit,
14,
42-61.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Gorse
(2001).
Global minimization of an off-lattice potential energy function using a chaperone-based refolding method.
|
| |
Biopolymers,
59,
411-426.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.J.Christensen,
E.B.Gottlin,
R.E.Benson,
and
P.T.Hamilton
(2001).
Phage display for target-based antibacterial drug discovery.
|
| |
Drug Discov Today,
6,
721-727.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Jain,
K.J.Kaur,
and
D.M.Salunke
(2001).
Plasticity in protein-peptide recognition: crystal structures of two different peptides bound to concanavalin A.
|
| |
Biophys J,
80,
2912-2921.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Thirumalai,
and
G.H.Lorimer
(2001).
Chaperonin-mediated protein folding.
|
| |
Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct,
30,
245-269.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.D.Fox,
R.B.Kapust,
and
D.S.Waugh
(2001).
Single amino acid substitutions on the surface of Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein can have a profound impact on the solubility of fusion proteins.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
10,
622-630.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Frydman
(2001).
Folding of newly translated proteins in vivo: the role of molecular chaperones.
|
| |
Annu Rev Biochem,
70,
603-647.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.Vijayalakshmi,
M.K.Mukhergee,
J.Graumann,
U.Jakob,
and
M.A.Saper
(2001).
The 2.2 A crystal structure of Hsp33: a heat shock protein with redox-regulated chaperone activity.
|
| |
Structure,
9,
367-375.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
O.Llorca,
J.Martín-Benito,
J.Grantham,
M.Ritco-Vonsovici,
K.R.Willison,
J.L.Carrascosa,
and
J.M.Valpuesta
(2001).
The 'sequential allosteric ring' mechanism in the eukaryotic chaperonin-assisted folding of actin and tubulin.
|
| |
EMBO J,
20,
4065-4075.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.A.Lloyd,
A.Forsberg,
H.Wolf-Watz,
and
M.S.Francis
(2001).
Targeting exported substrates to the Yersinia TTSS: different functions for different signals?
|
| |
Trends Microbiol,
9,
367-371.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
S.A.Lloyd,
M.Norman,
R.Rosqvist,
and
H.Wolf-Watz
(2001).
Yersinia YopE is targeted for type III secretion by N-terminal, not mRNA, signals.
|
| |
Mol Microbiol,
39,
520-531.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
V.Grantcharova,
E.J.Alm,
D.Baker,
and
A.L.Horwich
(2001).
Mechanisms of protein folding.
|
| |
Curr Opin Struct Biol,
11,
70-82.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.A.Houry
(2001).
Mechanism of substrate recognition by the chaperonin GroEL.
|
| |
Biochem Cell Biol,
79,
569-577.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Y.Liang,
J.Li,
J.Chen,
and
C.C.Wang
(2001).
Thermodynamics of the folding of D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase assisted by protein disulfide isomerase studied by microcalorimetry.
|
| |
Eur J Biochem,
268,
4183-4189.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Sha,
S.Lee,
and
D.M.Cyr
(2000).
The crystal structure of the peptide-binding fragment from the yeast Hsp40 protein Sis1.
|
| |
Structure,
8,
799-807.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Klanner,
W.Neupert,
and
T.Langer
(2000).
The chaperonin-related protein Tcm62p ensures mitochondrial gene expression under heat stress.
|
| |
FEBS Lett,
470,
365-369.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
J.L.Feltham,
and
L.M.Gierasch
(2000).
GroEL-substrate interactions: molding the fold, or folding the mold?
|
| |
Cell,
100,
193-196.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.D.de Beus,
S.M.Doyle,
and
C.M.Teschke
(2000).
GroEL binds a late folding intermediate of phage P22 coat protein.
|
| |
Cell Stress Chaperones,
5,
163-172.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.E.Gottesman,
and
W.A.Hendrickson
(2000).
Protein folding and unfolding by Escherichia coli chaperones and chaperonins.
|
| |
Curr Opin Microbiol,
3,
197-202.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Fändrich,
M.A.Tito,
M.R.Leroux,
A.A.Rostom,
F.U.Hartl,
C.M.Dobson,
and
C.V.Robinson
(2000).
Observation of the noncovalent assembly and disassembly pathways of the chaperone complex MtGimC by mass spectrometry.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
97,
14151-14155.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Olsen,
B.Iverson,
and
G.Georgiou
(2000).
High-throughput screening of enzyme libraries.
|
| |
Curr Opin Biotechnol,
11,
331-337.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
O.Llorca,
J.Martín-Benito,
M.Ritco-Vonsovici,
J.Grantham,
G.M.Hynes,
K.R.Willison,
J.L.Carrascosa,
and
J.M.Valpuesta
(2000).
Eukaryotic chaperonin CCT stabilizes actin and tubulin folding intermediates in open quasi-native conformations.
|
| |
EMBO J,
19,
5971-5979.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
P.A.Voziyan,
and
M.T.Fisher
(2000).
Chaperonin-assisted folding of glutamine synthetase under nonpermissive conditions: off-pathway aggregation propensity does not determine the co-chaperonin requirement.
|
| |
Protein Sci,
9,
2405-2412.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Siegert,
M.R.Leroux,
C.Scheufler,
F.U.Hartl,
and
I.Moarefi
(2000).
Structure of the molecular chaperone prefoldin: unique interaction of multiple coiled coil tentacles with unfolded proteins.
|
| |
Cell,
103,
621-632.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.S.Sidhu
(2000).
Phage display in pharmaceutical biotechnology.
|
| |
Curr Opin Biotechnol,
11,
610-616.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |
|