 |
PDBsum entry 1ask
|
|
|
|
 |
Contents |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Residue conservation analysis
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
J Mol Biol
272:716-730
(1997)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Nuclear protein import is decreased by engineered mutants of nuclear transport factor 2 (NTF2) that do not bind GDP-Ran.
|
|
W.D.Clarkson,
A.H.Corbett,
B.M.Paschal,
H.M.Kent,
A.J.McCoy,
L.Gerace,
P.A.Silver,
M.Stewart.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
Nuclear transport factor 2 (NTF2) is associated with the translocation stage of
nuclear protein import and binds both to nuclear pore proteins (nucleoporins)
containing phenylalanine-rich repeats and to the Ras family GTPase Ran. In this
study we probed the role of the NTF2-Ran interaction in nuclear protein import
using site-directed mutants of NTF2 that interfere with its interaction with
GDP-Ran. The design of these mutants was based on the X-ray crystal structure of
NTF2 and was concentrated on conserved residues in and around the molecule's
hydrophobic cavity. The mutant NTF2 cDNAs were expressed in Escherichia coli.
Purified mutant proteins retained the interaction with FxFG-repeat nucleoporins,
but several mutants in the negatively charged residues that surround the NTF2
cavity or in residues in the cavity itself were unable to bind GDP-Ran in vitro.
The crystal structure of the E42K mutant protein showed significant structural
changes only in this side-chain, indicating that it participated directly in the
interaction with GDP-Ran. In permeabilised cell nuclear protein import assays,
only wild-type NTF2 and mutants that bound GDP-Ran were functional. Furthermore,
when the NTF2 E42K and D92N/D94N NTF2 mutants that failed to bind GDP-Ran in
vitro were substituted for the chromosomal yeast NTF2, the yeast cells became
non-viable, whereas yeast substituted with wild-type human NTF2 remained viable.
We conclude that interaction between NTF2 and GDP-Ran is important for efficient
nuclear protein import.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selected figure(s)
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Figure 2.
Figure 2. 1D, 2D and 3D models of
mutants generated. (a) Alignment
of human and yeast NTF2 protein
sequences showing the mutations
introduced into the human protein
above the sequences. The locations
of two temperature-sensitive yeast
NTF2 mutants M83T and D91G
(Corbett & Silver, 1996) are indi-
cated underneath the sequence.
(b) A CPK space-filling model of a
single polypeptide chain of NTF2
(Bullock et al., 1996) showing the
positions of the residues of NTF2
that were mutated. (Note that the
mutations are localised predomi-
nantly within or near the central
hydrophobic cavity.) Aspartate 23
(the D23N mutation) is not visible
in this view, the residue being
located towards the back of the
protein. Residues 126 and 127 were
not identifiable in the crystal struc-
ture of this NTF2 chain, and so the
F126delta truncation is not shown.
(c) Schematic model of the NTF2
cavity and surrounding surface
showing the key residues facing
from the cavity, and the mutations
introduced.
|
 |
Figure 8.
Figure 8. Interaction of NTF2 with
Ran and nucleoporins detected
using a two-hybrid interaction
trap assay. Interactions were quan-
tified using a b-galactosidase
activity assay. Each column rep-
resents the average of three
independent assays and error
bars represent standard deviations.
(a) Interactions between wild-type
and mutant NTF2 and either Ran
(black) or Nsp1 (white). Although
all NTF2 constructs interact with
Nsp1, mutant NTF2 constructs
such as E42K and D92/94N do
not interact with Ran effectively.
Others, such as D117N, interact
with Ran to the same extent as
wild-type. (b) Gsp1 and Ran show
the same pattern of binding to
NTF2 mutants when tested for
growth on selectable media,
whereas neither wild-type nor
mutant NTF2 bound to Ras.
(c) and (d) Interactions between
wild-type NTF2 and a range of
nucleoporins as indicated. In (c) b-
galactosidase assays show NTF2
interacts with FxFG nucleoporins
such as Nsp1, Nup1 and Nup2,
but not with nucleoporins contain-
ing FG repeats such as Nup100,
Nup116, Rip1 or Yrb2 (called
Nup36 by Nehrbass & Blobel,
1996). The same spectrum of inter-
actions was seen with E42K and
D92/94N mutants on selective
media (d).
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
The above figures are
reprinted
by permission from Elsevier:
J Mol Biol
(1997,
272,
716-730)
copyright 1997.
|
|
| |
Figures were
selected
by an automated process.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
H.J.He,
Q.Wang,
W.W.Zheng,
J.X.Wang,
Q.S.Song,
and
X.F.Zhao
(2010).
Function of nuclear transport factor 2 and Ran in the 20E signal transduction pathway in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera.
|
| |
BMC Cell Biol,
11,
1.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Kahms,
P.Lehrich,
J.Hüve,
N.Sanetra,
and
R.Peters
(2009).
Binding site distribution of nuclear transport receptors and transport complexes in single nuclear pore complexes.
|
| |
Traffic,
10,
1228-1242.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
T.Jovanovic-Talisman,
J.Tetenbaum-Novatt,
A.S.McKenney,
A.Zilman,
R.Peters,
M.P.Rout,
and
B.T.Chait
(2009).
Artificial nanopores that mimic the transport selectivity of the nuclear pore complex.
|
| |
Nature,
457,
1023-1027.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Van Impe,
T.Hubert,
V.De Corte,
B.Vanloo,
C.Boucherie,
J.Vandekerckhove,
and
J.Gettemans
(2008).
A new role for nuclear transport factor 2 and Ran: nuclear import of CapG.
|
| |
Traffic,
9,
695-707.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Cook,
F.Bono,
M.Jinek,
and
E.Conti
(2007).
Structural biology of nucleocytoplasmic transport.
|
| |
Annu Rev Biochem,
76,
647-671.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Lévesque,
Y.C.Bor,
L.H.Matzat,
L.Jin,
S.Berberoglu,
D.Rekosh,
M.L.Hammarskjöld,
and
B.M.Paschal
(2006).
Mutations in tap uncouple RNA export activity from translocation through the nuclear pore complex.
|
| |
Mol Biol Cell,
17,
931-943.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Yamada,
I.W.Mattaj,
and
Y.Yoneda
(2004).
An ATP-dependent activity that releases RanGDP from NTF2.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
279,
36228-36234.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
N.I.Kiskin,
J.P.Siebrasse,
and
R.Peters
(2003).
Optical microwell assay of membrane transport kinetics.
|
| |
Biophys J,
85,
2311-2322.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Bayliss,
S.W.Leung,
R.P.Baker,
B.B.Quimby,
A.H.Corbett,
and
M.Stewart
(2002).
Structural basis for the interaction between NTF2 and nucleoporin FxFG repeats.
|
| |
EMBO J,
21,
2843-2853.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Bayliss,
T.Littlewood,
L.A.Strawn,
S.R.Wente,
and
M.Stewart
(2002).
GLFG and FxFG nucleoporins bind to overlapping sites on importin-beta.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
277,
50597-50606.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
B.B.Quimby,
S.W.Leung,
R.Bayliss,
M.T.Harreman,
G.Thirumala,
M.Stewart,
and
A.H.Corbett
(2001).
Functional analysis of the hydrophobic patch on nuclear transport factor 2 involved in interactions with the nuclear pore in vivo.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
276,
38820-38829.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.E.Black,
J.M.Holaska,
L.Lévesque,
B.Ossareh-Nazari,
C.Gwizdek,
C.Dargemont,
and
B.M.Paschal
(2001).
NXT1 is necessary for the terminal step of Crm1-mediated nuclear export.
|
| |
J Cell Biol,
152,
141-155.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.C.Saphire,
T.Guan,
E.C.Schirmer,
G.R.Nemerow,
and
L.Gerace
(2000).
Nuclear import of adenovirus DNA in vitro involves the nuclear protein import pathway and hsc70.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
275,
4298-4304.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.B.Quimby,
C.A.Wilson,
and
A.H.Corbett
(2000).
The interaction between Ran and NTF2 is required for cell cycle progression.
|
| |
Mol Biol Cell,
11,
2617-2629.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.Chaillan-Huntington,
C.V.Braslavsky,
J.Kuhlmann,
and
M.Stewart
(2000).
Dissecting the interactions between NTF2, RanGDP, and the nucleoporin XFXFG repeats.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
275,
5874-5879.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
C.M.Lane,
I.Cushman,
and
M.S.Moore
(2000).
Selective disruption of nuclear import by a functional mutant nuclear transport carrier.
|
| |
J Cell Biol,
151,
321-332.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Stewart
(2000).
Insights into the molecular mechanism of nuclear trafficking using nuclear transport factor 2 (NTF2).
|
| |
Cell Struct Funct,
25,
217-225.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Bayliss,
A.H.Corbett,
and
M.Stewart
(2000).
The molecular mechanism of transport of macromolecules through nuclear pore complexes.
|
| |
Traffic,
1,
448-456.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Bayliss,
T.Littlewood,
and
M.Stewart
(2000).
Structural basis for the interaction between FxFG nucleoporin repeats and importin-beta in nuclear trafficking.
|
| |
Cell,
102,
99.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.M.Steggerda,
B.E.Black,
and
B.M.Paschal
(2000).
Monoclonal antibodies to NTF2 inhibit nuclear protein import by preventing nuclear translocation of the GTPase Ran.
|
| |
Mol Biol Cell,
11,
703-719.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.E.Black,
L.Lévesque,
J.M.Holaska,
T.C.Wood,
and
B.M.Paschal
(1999).
Identification of an NTF2-related factor that binds Ran-GTP and regulates nuclear protein export.
|
| |
Mol Cell Biol,
19,
8616-8624.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
D.Görlich,
and
U.Kutay
(1999).
Transport between the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm.
|
| |
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol,
15,
607-660.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.S.Ullman,
S.Shah,
M.A.Powers,
and
D.J.Forbes
(1999).
The nucleoporin nup153 plays a critical role in multiple types of nuclear export.
|
| |
Mol Biol Cell,
10,
649-664.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
W.Hu,
and
D.A.Jans
(1999).
Efficiency of importin alpha/beta-mediated nuclear localization sequence recognition and nuclear import. Differential role of NTF2.
|
| |
J Biol Chem,
274,
15820-15827.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Smith,
A.Brownawell,
and
I.G.Macara
(1998).
Nuclear import of Ran is mediated by the transport factor NTF2.
|
| |
Curr Biol,
8,
1403-1406.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
K.Ribbeck,
G.Lipowsky,
H.M.Kent,
M.Stewart,
and
D.Görlich
(1998).
NTF2 mediates nuclear import of Ran.
|
| |
EMBO J,
17,
6587-6598.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
L.F.Pemberton,
G.Blobel,
and
J.S.Rosenblum
(1998).
Transport routes through the nuclear pore complex.
|
| |
Curr Opin Cell Biol,
10,
392-399.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
M.Oki,
and
T.Nishimoto
(1998).
A protein required for nuclear-protein import, Mog1p, directly interacts with GTP-Gsp1p, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ran homologue.
|
| |
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,
95,
15388-15393.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |