 |
PDBsum entry 145d
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
DOI no:
|
Biochemistry
32:13381-13392
(1993)
|
|
PubMed id:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Structure and thermodynamics of nonalternating C.G base pairs in Z-DNA: the 1.3-A crystal structure of the asymmetric hexanucleotide d(m5CGGGm5CG).d(m5CGCCm5CG).
|
|
G.P.Schroth,
T.F.Kagawa,
P.S.Ho.
|
|
|
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
|
| |
|
We have solved the single-crystal X-ray structure of the complementary
hexanucleotides d(m5-CGGGm5CG) and d(m5CGCCm5CG). The hexamer duplex was
crystallized as Z-DNA, but contains a single C.G base pair that does not follow
the alternating pyrimidine/purine rule for Z-DNA formation. This is the first
crystal structure which serves to illustrate the structural consequences of
placing a cytosine in the sterically disfavored syn conformation. In addition,
since these sequences are not self-complementary, the individual strands of this
asymmetric hexamer are unique in sequence and therefore distinguishable in the
crystal lattice. Nevertheless, the crystal of this duplex is isomorphous with
other Z-DNA hexamer structures. The asymmetry of this hexamer sequence required
that the structure be solved using two unique models, which are distinguished by
the orientation of hexanucleotides in the crystal lattice. In one model (the GG
model) the cytosine in the syn conformation is packed against the terminal
guanine base of a symmetry-related hexamer, while in the alternative model (the
CC model) this cytosine sits exposed in a solvent channel of the lattice. We
find that neither model alone can completely account for the observed electron
densities. The two models ultimately were refined together. A composite
structure consisting of 65% GG model and 35% CC model refined to an R-factor of
19.3%, which was significantly lower than refinements using either model alone.
A detailed analysis of these two structures shows that, in spite of the
out-of-alternation C.G base pair, the features characteristic of Z-DNA have been
maintained. Both models, however, show significant local structural adjustments
to accommodate the single cytosine base which is forced to adopt the syn
conformation in each hexamer. In general, it appears that in order to relieve
the energetically unfavorable steric contacts between the cytosine base in the
syn conformation and the deoxyribose sugar, the base is forced into a highly
buckled conformation, and that this large buckle in turn alters the conformation
of neighboring residues. This unusual conformation also significantly weakens
base-stacking interactions between the cytosine in syn and the adjacent residues
in the helix and affects the exposure of the bases to solvent. We conclude that
this crystal structure provides a molecular rationale for why nonalternating
bases are energetically disfavored in Z-DNA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Literature references that cite this PDB file's key reference
|
|
 |
| |
PubMed id
|
 |
Reference
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
S.C.Ha,
J.Choi,
H.Y.Hwang,
A.Rich,
Y.G.Kim,
and
K.K.Kim
(2009).
The structures of non-CG-repeat Z-DNAs co-crystallized with the Z-DNA-binding domain, hZ alpha(ADAR1).
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
37,
629-637.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
R.Caliandro,
B.Carrozzini,
G.L.Cascarano,
L.De Caro,
C.Giacovazzo,
and
D.Siliqi
(2005).
Phasing at resolution higher than the experimental resolution.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
61,
556-565.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Pan,
Y.Xiong,
K.Shi,
and
M.Sundaralingam
(2003).
Crystal structure of a bulged RNA tetraplex at 1.1 a resolution: implications for a novel binding site in RNA tetraplex.
|
| |
Structure,
11,
1423-1430.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
G.Schuerman,
K.Van Hecke,
and
L.Van Meervelt
(2003).
Exploration of the influence of 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine incorporation on the structure of d[CACG(IDU)G].
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
59,
1525-1528.
|
 |
|
PDB code:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.H.Chou,
K.H.Chin,
and
A.H.Wang
(2003).
Unusual DNA duplex and hairpin motifs.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
31,
2461-2474.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
A.Harper,
J.A.Brannigan,
M.Buck,
L.Hewitt,
R.J.Lewis,
M.H.Moore,
and
B.Schneider
(1998).
Structure of d(TGCGCA)2 and a comparison to other DNA hexamers.
|
| |
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr,
54,
1273-1284.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
L.Malinina,
V.Tereshko,
E.Ivanova,
J.A.Subirana,
V.Zarytova,
and
Y.Nekrasov
(1998).
Structural variability and new intermolecular interactions of Z-DNA in crystals of d(pCpGpCpGpCpG).
|
| |
Biophys J,
74,
2482-2490.
|
 |
|
PDB codes:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
S.R.Lynch,
and
I.Tinoco
(1998).
The structure of the L3 loop from the hepatitis delta virus ribozyme: a syn cytidine.
|
| |
Nucleic Acids Res,
26,
980-987.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
B.Hartmann,
and
R.Lavery
(1996).
DNA structural forms.
|
| |
Q Rev Biophys,
29,
309-368.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
The most recent references are shown first.
Citation data come partly from CiteXplore and partly
from an automated harvesting procedure. Note that this is likely to be
only a partial list as not all journals are covered by
either method. However, we are continually building up the citation data
so more and more references will be included with time.
Where a reference describes a PDB structure, the PDB
codes are
shown on the right.
|
');
}
}
 |